Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
From the predictable department:…
MM’s: knock knock.
Outsiders: who’s there?
MM’s: For
Outsiders: For who?
MM’s .04 you.
What do you mean? Generally you can have a ceo a chairman and then a president. In the case of LQMT there is a lot of overlap since the executives are basically in charge of themselves.
Almost like a Mom and Pop store. For example a family owned and operated pizzeria.
Looks like somebody is not into the year end earnings, or maybe did not realize Bresnick is now the President.
LAKE FOREST, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Liquidmetal® Technologies, Inc. , Liquidmetal® Technologies, Inc., the world’s leading developer of amorphous alloys and composites, will hold its year-end earnings conference call on Tuesday, March 12th, at 4:30 p.m. Eastern time. Liquidmetal Technologies (LQMT.NaE) CEO Tony Chung will host the call.
Please Dial in 5-10 minutes prior to the start time using the information below:
Date:
Tuesday, March 12th, 2024
Time:
4:30 p.m. Eastern time (1:30 p.m. Pacific time)
Conference Call this next Tuesday 12 March. Maybe we hear about that twitter post in China!
yes it would. agreed.
Just in case anyone wants to know but didn’t ask anyway.
In case no one noticed. That dental company Zyris, which got quite a few interested and was touted for a while by LQMT (former) executives.
Bit the dust too with LQMT.
Not a trace.
What happened? Another fine example of frankness and upfront communications from LQMT. You can’t blame and NDA.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Which begs the question. Which is more painful visiting a dentist and needing root canal surgery or being invested long term in LQMT? 🤔 :)
It is information like this that supports iateclube’s point of views very accurately and many others as well.
For years now around the www there seems to be a feeling of something positive that somehow images of products once posted on LQMT’s website and used in promoting the same amorphous metal products in China and elsewhere would somehow link to LQMT USA a revenue stream.
Of course all know by now after 7 years of this and these posted products that no such thing has ever occurred. All of these well wishes and positive theories are quickly dispelled by LQMT in LF CA itself, by just reading the 10Q’s 10K’s and 8K’s.
Any $$$ from any of these pictures posted abroad or sales from any contracts abroad outside of LQMT’s footprint as defined in the agreements with Eontec or their partners and the so called overhyped and theorized maze has not ever resulted in adding to LQMT’s financial bottom line.
In fact it is easier to count the pictures on LQMT’s website that have resulted in any new revenues. Two of them that come to mind are the Bridge Pins and the other are the watches from the Swatch Group.
Potentially you read of others abroad manufacturing and selling foldable mobile cell phones using the Liquidmetal technology developed here in the USA and using a process that may have been developed abroad. But you see no new revenues from any of these product sales reaching the shores of LQMT in California.
The simple reasons for this probably can be found in the LQMT/Apple agreements and the LQMT/Eontec agreements.
Yes it is true that there are sales and unverified claims of sales by USA accounting FASB rules. But none of it has ever added to LQMT’s bottom line. Though it has added to a lot of hype hope and wishful thinking so far. It is as of today the only positive worth it has had. In effect it adds to FOMO and becomes a replacement for the actual silence and in my opinion, disrespect from LQMT.
The lack of communications. The feeling of no transparency or regards for shareholders outside of LQMT.
I’m sure they have their reasons. That too is why some hold onto their shares.
Good luck to you.
There;s one source, a twitter post out of China that claims its Liquidmetal
You just can’t make this up. Well maybe LQMT can. No pun intended. Remember this?
Liquidmetal may be ideally suited for
Implantable Devices.
Few products are as carefully engineered as implantable medical devices. Materials that have prolonged contact with body tissues and fluids must be biocompatible, and when they contain batteries and sensitive electronics, they must be durable and hermetically sealed.
Forming the precise fit required to create a hermetic seal to protect internal electronics, and forming the miniature structures that contain them requires costly machining. Liquidmetal’s recent prototype run of amorphous metal pacemaker enclosures indicates significant potential cost savings for similar components.
Source LQMT.
There’s more: “Precision machining or forming of titanium housings can cost more than $80, compared to less than $30 for Liquidmetal
housings in volume.” Source LQMT.
I’m posting this because they are facts as stated by LQMT and not made up hypothetical BS by me.
There is more. But the above should be enough to support anyone’s concern for frankness progress and transparency. I didn’t post the prototype. LQMT did! What the hell happened???
They said they were doing more tests ! Not I. LQMT!
Outsiders who express skepticism, who can blame them? They are factually supported imo, by the behavior of the executives of LQMT as stated by and in their own documents.
In fact, the prototype product believe it or not, that is most touted by photos by LQMT, is the pacemaker Can/Shell, at least 5 times.
Neither the ring nor the pacemaker Can are the only prototypes of concern. The erasure of all documentation with mega company ConMed is another example. Then there are the hundreds of prototypes for hundreds of potential customers that just miraculously turned into donkey dust. Not one word.
No wonder some believe the worst. Personally I believe LQMT purposely wants to keep it this way. They have their reasons.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
If the amorphous metal pacemaker prototype shell/can was more economical and of better prioperties in all metallic aspects. Then why did LQMT not take it to the shareholders of these companies. Do they not suffer too in share price?
After all why would the three largest selling pacemaker companies want to spend more money and why too would health insurance companies want to spend more of their premiums as well if they could save a few million each year?
There are a lot of points for concern and yours is just the tip of the iceberg!
Left in the dark? More like shoved into the black hole of our universe. Where the hard earned income of many has never seen the light of day for a long long time.
This will be a toe in with Apple revenue. Hopefully with more to come. It goes on!!!
This is a sim tool made for Apple's Vision Pro that is made of Liquidmetal...according to Joshua over on REDDIT.
The point of concern is why there seems to be some kind of contract for lqmt with move, but we the shareholders are left in the dark.
What the hell is this part 2.
PayMEmf recently mentioned manipulation.
More buys by volume than sells and the stock goes down.
Time for an eye exam.
What the hell is this?
It looks to me to be one of those video recording cameras your gastroenterologist makes you swallow.
GOROmanさん(@GOROman )よりApple VisionProのDeveloperStrapを譲り受けた!ありがとうございます!開発用にとても欲しかった!
— YORIMIYA (@jav6868) February 29, 2024
そしてこれが噂のVisionProピンww めっちゃ高級感と重量感あるw pic.twitter.com/J2iP06mUgJ
Point 1. You could be right.
Point 2. You are right.
See link below with a disclaimer and a review that seems to be biased or should I say coached.
https://www.bustle.com/wellness/evie-smart-ring-review
Point 3. Although LQMT’s amorphous metal is harder than titanium, neither one of them are scratch proof. Scratch resistant is very subjective without specifically listing examples of activities that will or will not scratch an amorphous metal formula from Liquidmetal technologies.
If true about the scratches out of the box…someone has a lot of splaining to do (as in explaining.)
Point 4. The last point…a frank discussion, a sit down, Don’t hold your breath. Seriously? When someone owns 46% of a company the only thing they need do is to dictate quietly. Hire and fire.
What’s to discuss…zero new contracts with zero new customers in 26 months? Zero + zero still equals zero. Unless one is into photography, the only progress to discuss are those new pictures of wearables, consumer electronics, medical and auto photos etc., posted on their website blog, some of them courtesy of their partners abroad.
When there are no patterns of contracts, there can never be a when, without the if occurring first. In the case of LQMT anyone understanding the history of contracts and has an understanding of algebra, knows that before a when, happens the if must come first.
For the when has no certain time going forward until the if happens first.
For example: IF LQMT does not add revenues to exceed the cash burn to operate, then LQMT will eventually no longer exist and there never will be a WHEN they find a contract to do so. This is as basic as it gets. And if anyone were to do their DD they would see too, that LQMT, in all of their filed 10K’s and 10Q’s state this fact very clearly. In there caveat section of risks.
Like myself you only bring out what most outside shareholders have been clamoring about…a sincere open, honest and transparent discussion to keep us up to date generically on progress, where NDA’s are concerned and frankly what is going on with their latest product touted on their blog, where an NDA is not of concern.
It is quite obvious to see that the purpose of shining a light on what is negative or perceived to be negative is only trying to elicit a positive response from the executives of LQMT imo.
Good luck to you.
Demonstrate otherwise? I speak for myself. I would not dare until I see more than one new contract per quarter.
Other than a couple of desperate fugitives from other message boards, there is nothing here or anywhere that disclaims the facts of life LQMT, Valencia Circle: It is dead. And cannot revive until the controlling entities say so. To be clear, the controlling entities are the Chairman of the Board through vote control, via LQMT Hong Kong, and the CCP he is beholden to. All the gabber about the demand of product from LQMT Valencia is and has always been nonsense. There is no demand for our retail shareholder pathway to money. .
Everything has been transferred to China. Somebody please do demonstrate otherwise, by the numbers.
It’s everywhere, but in our pockets…
https://education.mrsec.wisc.edu/amorphous-metals/
Tired of eating golf club sandwiches.
Where’s the beef. Will settle for lobster or salmon too. :)
Did LQMT and their shareholders ever get a piece of this pie?
https://www.nasa.gov/technology/metallic-glass-gears-up-for-cobots-coatings-and-more/
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Ok a BLT if I have too!
Thanks Chip. Holding long and strong. Still a believer. Just a matter of when, not if.
Looks generic (commercial) to me.
The price is interesting, as the market has a realization for accuracy and the otc is known for its manipulation.
Nasdaq would offer a clearer picture for shareholders.
For FYI and CHIP, thank you for being here. I would remind that there is nothing from LL, the MAZE, LQMTHK, or LQMT Valencia, that suggests we will ever get paid a dime. Not one word. Well LL said we would be profitable some years ago........
Another week passes and LQMT’s share price is down 1.1% from 0.054 cents to 0.0534 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
Basically, another boring week imo, for LQMT.
Basically, another boring month imo, for LQMT.
Still no announcement of any new contracts going into 26 months. A reflection on management’s results in not attaining success or increasing shareholder value. Just living off of the (fat) cash burn from the ipo sellouts and partnerships.
Sounds terrible. But if there is anyone out there that can directly link LQMT to some positive progress (not theories) resulting in increasing shareholder value, by all means post it. I have looked. But, perhaps I overlooked something.
So far no replies.
Share price is holding in the low pennies between the 0.05’s and 0.06’s as predicted. Future potential although weak, seems to be the catalyst along with an insider purchase for holding the pps up above 0.040 cents. It’s not FOMO. Otherwise the share price imo, already would have dropped below 0.03 cents.
As stated a gazillion times: with anemic trading volumes the share price means BUBKIS! and so too does another picture of a product using Liquidmetal, without the big long overdue 8K.
Perhaps in 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2024, all in it will be very thankful and glad that they did.
FOMO lives and is probably the main reason why anyone holds on regardless of any other opinion at this time. Not wanting to take a loss at this point may be another.
I try to present a balanced view based on the facts not on the emotions of anyone hyping or bashing LQMT. I believe I nailed it correctly. This board has had it correct past and present from potential to expectations to hope to FOMO.
Unfortunately LQMT can still hit the 02’s. Not my wish. The performance of LQMT will decide that.
No matter what anyone’s view is for LQMT going forward. The fundamentals have not changed and every day LQMT’s trading data are reminders of that fact.
Beyond March, there is potential for a contract announcement to correct the southerly direction LQMT has been heading for the past seven years.
There doesn’t seem to be any enthusiasm for the upcoming 10K/10Q1. And with solid unfortunate reasoning. So much for positive thinking.
No theories here. No speculation either.
Perhaps TC might give everyone a pleasant surprise in the next week and announce another end of year conference call or should I say a one way outgoing conference call with no incoming dialogue from outside shareholders. I base this on last year’s performance.
So far TC has not announced an end of year 2023 conference call as he did last year with 2022.
There is a real potential and real probability for the stock to head south again after the 10K to the 0.03’s and then the 0.02’s. Not something anyone would want or like to see happen. A positive PR, can change that outcome or another insider purchase.
The fact of no contracts being announced regarding the ring has already led to plausible theories. On the other hand I don’t believe the ceo is throwing $50 thousand dollars into the abyss for nothing.
My bet is on one present and one former executive who hold at least 1 million shares and I’m not talking about LL, regardless of how low the SP goes.
Will this be the year revenues increase consistently? Only the 2nd, 3D, and 4th Q’s will tell. I’ll be pleasantly surprised if the 1st Q tics up.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Anyone who loves the game Kick the Can from the early 20th century, this could be the investment for you. Over twenty years and still kicking, :)
As long as everyone is behaving, I’ll share a few more thoughts…
THE ALLOY…I think it’s still 106b since that alloy was used to develop the process for color generation and there is more history.
FLEXIBILITY…Remember the demo where they bend a piece of amorphous metal in a testing machine and deflect it about 1.5” between 2 supports 4” apart? They were touting its ability to bend sharply and return to its original shape. That property, along with the proper cross-section can provide the degree of flexibility they talk about.
SCRATCHING….I have a gold ring with significant wear and it has been alloyed with another metal…12Kt gold only 50% gold. The 106b alloy is 72% zirconium which is a very hard element but we really know little about the “color generation” process. What I do recall is that the surface is bombarded with “something” to create an oxide layer and that layer, depending upon thickness makes the various colors. The thickness of this layer is similar to the wavelength of light. I suspect that the comments about scratching relate to some sort of damage to the very thin color layer which could originate in the assembly process as the electronics are pressed into place on the ring itself.. They will need to work on that manufacturing step eliminate that defect.
Cheers!
Congrats on still being lucid and optimistic.
Thank you, Chipholder, for being so rational. Others on this board are clearly heading toward dementia. From the looks of it it'll be of the amorphous variety!
So let’s speculate a bit…..If I were introducing a new product to a new market….the first decision is “how many units to make to support the intro?” Pick a number …how about 20,000 since that would mean $5 million in sales which should be a good place to start. That’s a couple million $ in inventory. The next big question relates to the distribution of colors/ring sizes in the 20,000 inventory (15 combinations)so with a few assumptions, the inventory is manufactured and we are ready to go public.
GOOD NEWS….overwhelming success and we have 50,000 pre-orders…..oh sh*t our manufacturing response time is 4-6 weeks so we start scrambling and this is where we are now. It will sort itself out!
Disclosure…I own a little MOVE and a whole lot more LQMT so I just join the other somewhat biased participants on this message board….but I’m a bit more positive. And yes, I’m older than Biden/Trump and still lucid.
Would this qualify?
“The patented Liquidmetal molding process also gave design freedom to produce unique contours that are functional and beautiful.”
Outside purchasers for MOVE??? Full disclosure would have included the purchase dates since at least one of those purchases was in 2021.
Outside purchasers for MOVE??? Full disclosure would have included the purchase dates since at least one of those purchases was in 2021.
My wife’s ring arrives tomorrow. I have seen a few new video reviews. We’ll get it set up and going this weekend.
Commercial name “Liquidmetal”
Specific naming requires TM (R)
I've called into these before
when Tom was the circus master.
Hopefully the clown show will pop the stock.
Remember, buy with Tony
Sell with Tony.
Couple things:
I may be wrong but the 4,000 sold units was a figure that included Evie rings and that other Movano bracelet that has similar features. This sales number was revealed after the special holiday sale. No?
A recent search of YouTube and Vimeo still did not display any private individuals doing some type of review or box opening. Movano claims that some Evie Rings were shipped and will be replaced due to scratching. Ummm.... it's really hard to believe that there is absolutely no private review type content available.
And finally...... I have been a shareholder for I don't know how long but during the course of that time I have been told that LQMTs BMGs cast in place net shape, available in a million colors, they are super sturdy, ***scores super ubbie dubbie on the Mohs scale of hardness "stronger than titanium" "**, can bounce really high, requires substantially less finishing work when it comes out of the mold, ....blah, blah, blah.
Now I'm told that the Evie Ring is elastic and the god damn thing comes from the manufacturer with scratches. Now, I'm the guy who claims that LQMT and their BMGS are nothing but BS. That there is no such thing as a Maze. And that we have heard the last words from Lugee Li a couple years ago. Well I gotta tell ya, if I was anything other than the LQMT gadfly; as a shareholder I would be demanding Tony Chung, Lugee Li, and Vince Carumba to sit down before us and have a frank discussion about the Movano business and these "network partners" that apparently can't produce these oversized lock washers to all the wonderful standards I have been told about all these years. What gives fellas?
Ring company hits another all time low. As posted by Bobroo earlier, they are out of stock.
Their website says “All sold out .”
No wonder LQMT started to walk south again.
You only sell about 4000 rings and you can’t deliver?
They should be giving all customers with delayed deliveries 15% off imo!
And LQMT touting the ring on the blog and no contact announcements?
Smells like another LQMT street game of three card Monty to me.
Let’s go folks under which cup is the ring? Anyone?
I can see sold out. But not taking anymore orders? Does that sound right?
And why is LQMT pumping the ring in a product that can’t be ordered.? Where is the value in that?
Too many fricken questions.
And why did two outsiders buy 22% of the outstanding shares combined? At a much higher share price to boot!!
Anyone?
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Can’t blame a nonexistent NDA this time:)
Boilingman: Many companies will have a copyright letter © and year at the bottom of each of their linked pages. Many will also have the registration letter ®. Both will be circled.
I am not talking about the bottom of the linked pages identifying a companiy’s material as copyrighted or trademark registered. I’m talking about the individual article posted by Liquidmetal technologies, when writing about the Evie ring in it’s entirety and leaving out the ® when talking about their patented materials. Also, when reading the article I am carefully reviewing the wording. There does appear to be a new formula being used.
Now amorphous metals are not scratch proof, although at times anyone might get that impression.
Here is an example of what Liquidmetal technologies states in one of their links regarding scratches….
“Wearables?
Improve the quality and durability of your products by switching to Liquidmetal. The molding process allows you to easily create aesthetic and form fitting geometries to get the comfort and style you desire. The elasticity of Liquidmetal will allow you to abuse your product without bending out of shape. If you sit on your headphones or eyeglasses, Liquidmetal will return to its original form. The hardness of the alloy will resist scratching and maintain the cosmetic finish.”
Here is what the Evie ring article states as posted by Liquidmetal technologies in their blog of 02-15-2024; “The patented Liquidmetal molding process also gave design freedom to produce unique contours that are functional and beautiful. The corrosion resistance and hardness of Liquidmetal will stand up to active lifestyles and maintain its beauty.”
I point this out because there was an article and I don’t know how true it is or false about someone who has an Evie ring commented that it scratched easily. Now naturally a competitor or anyone biased would post a bias against their competition.
Being straight forward with the consumer will always result in less dissatisfaction. Just my stupid opinion.
Now if you go to the movano website. They are straight forward. Page 2/4 the ring is scratch resistant.
Of course I can always be wrong as my opinions are always worth less than the price of a LQMT share.
REsearchFYI:
"Also there appears to be a new formula involved and the trademark registration circled letter ® is not shown."
Go look again...I'm seeing a circled letter R.
The blog was updated about 12 days ago. No comments? It appears LQMT is advertising the Evie ring to increase sales, 🤔.
https://liquidmetal.com/lqm-evie-hsa/
Also there appears to be a new formula involved and the trademark registration circled letter ® is not shown.
The new formula appears to be softer from the wording and may not be scratch resistant. Durable, yes. Scratch proof, no.
What gives??? Anyone?
Not holding my breath waiting for any clarification.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
I think you are on to something there.
Looks like the .04’s are knocking again at LQMT’s door.
On this day last year.
LAKE FOREST, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 27, 2023-- Liquidmetal® Technologies, Inc. (OTCQB: LQMT), the world’s leading developer of amorphous alloys and composites, will hold a year end earnings conference call on Tuesday, March 14th, at 4:30 p.m. Eastern time. Liquidmetal Technologies CEO Tony Chung will host the call.
Source LQMT.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Tic tic tic tic tic tic.
Sad that we have to think that way. I would love to say ; Wow another million dollar contract plus. Or another $5 million dollar quarter. Hasn’t happened in over a decade from product sales.
Perhaps the stock will hit $100 dollars a share if the can perfect the bond of a Liquidmetal formula on a reusable paper shopping bag to make it last a long long time and satisfy both the consumer and those promoting a safer cleaner environment.
Some in amorphous metals have been working on it for over a year for different reasons and different uses.
No CE required. Just paper that will last a long time and fold itself up after each use to be stored.
One can only dream.
I even hate to speculate on any deal they have reached based on how many times the have had to compromise or bend over to nail down a contract of any size recently.
Good luck to you.
Hopefully they are getting a Mr Wonderful inspired royalty off the top. But I’m betting they’re not that smart / savvy.
Spot on. No one knows who or when the tech. will be approved. A lot of competition out there attempting to do it. And if they rush through it. One can see lawsuits coming. Not something a company wants to be involved in.
Blood oxygen should be approved if claims and testing satisfy the FDA.
I think blood pressure approval would be a huge factor in upping sales as well.
The bigger picture will be what kind of deal LQMT has agreed to. Will it be all hype like the golf deal or will it be an actual per product part ordered?
I’m leaning towards a more favorable outcome right now. In the meantime since no impacting 8K has been released from any new deal, I can see LQMT after the upcoming 10K heading south again. Could be an opportunity to add or for non investors to buy in, in lieu of the potential for later this year.
Good luck to you.
But not relevant to anything that’s actually happening now. The Evie ring did not apply for glucose. They did for blood oxygen though. The Apple Watch is violating blood oxygen patents. Glucose is pie in the sky. I think we can all agree we don’t want our smart rings and watches drinking our blood throughout the day to measure glucose levels. At best glucose is what, a decade away, if it ever reliably happens in a watch or ring. Without drinking our blood.
I just read the accepted patent application from MOVANO where it specifically states RF technology for the measurement of blood glucose, blood pressure and heart rate in claims 24-27. One more step…still need the FDA on board for the glucose part.
Followers
|
884
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
8
|
Posts (Total)
|
233429
|
Created
|
04/30/05
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators PatentGuy1 Almosthere |
Liquidmetal® Technologies (ISO 9001:2008 certified) is a leading force in the research, development and commercialization of amorphous metals. Our revolutionary class of patented alloys and processes form the basis of high performance materials in a broad range of medical, military, consumer, industrial, and sporting goods products.
Discovered by researchers at the California Institute of Technology, Liquidmetal alloys’ unique atomic structure enables applications to achieve performance and accuracy levels that have not been possible before. The revolutionary class of patented materials technology redefine performance and design paradigms institutionalized by traditional materials.
As Liquidmetal Technologies controls the intellectual property rights with more than 70 U.S. patents, these high performance materials are dramatically changing the way companies develop new products.
LINKS
Featured: Automotive Pressure Sensors, 9.36 billion market by 2020
1. LiquidMetal Website
2. LiquidMetal Manufacturing Facility
3. OTC Market Report
4. Engel Liquidmetal Forum (Nov 2015)
5. ENGEL Symposium 2015
6. ENGEL Interview on Liquidmetal
PATENTS (USPTO)
1. Search Crucible Intellectual (Apple and LiquidMetal R&D)
2. Search Apple and LiquidMetal
3. Search Cross-license Patents w/Eontec
4. Search Vitreloy
5. Search Pre-grant Patents
VIDEOS
1. OMEGA Liquidmetal Bezel
2. ENGEL e-motion 110T
3. Liquidmetal Bouncing Ball
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Professor Lugee Li, Chairman
Professor Li was appointed as a member of our board of directors in March 2016 and became Chairman of our board of directors in October 2016. Professor Li is the founder, Chairman, and majority stockholder of DongGuan Eontec Co. Ltd., a Hong Kong company listed on the Shenzen Stock Exchange engaged in the production of precision die-cast products and the research and development of new materials. Professor Li founded Eontec in 1993 and has served as Chairman since that date. At Eontec, Professor Li is responsible for strategic development and research and development. Professor Li is also the founder and sole shareholder of Leader Biomedical Limited, a Hong Kong company engaged in the supply of biomaterials and surgical implants. Professor Li serves as an analyst for the Institute of Metal Research at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and serves part-time as a professor at several universities in China.
Abdi Mahamedi, Vice Chairman
Abdi Mahamedi has served on our board of directors since May 2009 and became Vice-Chairman of our board of directors in October 2016. Since 1987, Mr. Mahamedi has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Carlyle Development Group of Companies (“CDG”), which develops and manages residential and commercial properties in the United States on behalf of investors worldwide. At CDG, Mr. Mahamedi evaluates and supervises all of the investment activities and management personnel. Prior to joining CDG, Mr. Mahamedi founded Emanuel Land Company, a subsidiary of Emanuel & Company, a Wall Street investment banking firm, and served as a managing director for Emanuel Land Company from 1986 to 1987. In 1983, Mr. Mahamedi received his B.S.E. degree in Civil and Structural Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania, and in 1984 he received his M.S.E. degree in Civil and Structural Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania.
Isaac Bresnick
Currently serves as Legal and Regulatory Affairs Director for the Leader Biomedical Group, a private company based in Hong Kong and operating from Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and has served in that role since October 2014. At Leader Biomedical, Mr. Bresnick is responsible for the direction and management of legal affairs, regulatory affairs, quality control, and quality assurance, as well as for advising executive management of Group companies. Mr. Bresnick also currently serves as Director of AAP Joints GmbH, a private company in Berlin, Germany, and has served in that role since July 2013. Mr. Bresnick received his J.D. from the University of Connecticut School of Law in 2013, and his B.S. in Industrial Design from the University of Bridgeport in 2008. After completion of his undergraduate studies and continuing through his enrollment at UCONN Law, Mr. Bresnick worked as Senior Arrangements Designer for Electric Boat Corporation, a subsidiary of General Dynamics, from June 2008 to December 2012.
Vincent Carrubba
An experienced corporate leader and serial entrepreneur with extensive senior executive, technical and manufacturing experience. Mr. Carrubba has created and guided new products to success in the consumer goods, electronics, automotive and construction industries and has conceptualized, financed and built factories and developed new manufacturing technologies throughout Asia. From September 2014 through the present, Mr. Carrubba has served as the CEO of Admiral Composite Technologies Inc. (“Admiral”), where he has developed new technologies for environmentally responsible and innovative building materials which represent Admiral’s product lines. Mr. Carrubba has also served as Admiral’s Chairman since its inception in 2009. From September 2014 through the present, Mr. Carrubba has served as the CEO of Asia Sourcing & Communications USA Inc. and he has served as its Chairman since its inception in 2013. From 2002 through August 2014, Mr. Carrubba served as the Director of R&D for Interdynamics Inc., IDQ Holdings, where he was responsible for all R&D and QC matters, including the management of engineering, legal, patenting, regulatory, insurance and consumer relations matters. From 1989 through 1992, Mr. Carrubba designed and installed the New York Stock Exchange telecommunications and information technology systems. Mr. Carrubba has held engineering and executive positions with Xerox, General Electric, Bristol-Meyers Squibb and AT&T and he is the inventor of several patents related to telecommunications, professional tools and consumer products. Mr. Carrubba received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Engineering Science and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Columbia University SEAS in 1982.
Tony Chung
Mr. Chung was appointed to our board of directors in August 2017. Mr. Chung had previously served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer from December 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Chung served as CFO at BETEK Corporation, a real estate and investment subsidiary of SK Engineering and Construction, and as CFO of Solarcity, a company providing advanced solar technology and installation services. Mr. Chung is a Certified Public Accountant and served eight years at KPMG as an Audit and Consulting Manager for several large multinational companies. He received his B.S. degree in Business Administration from the University of California, Berkeley. Mr. Chung is also an Attorney at Law and received his J.D. degree from Pacific Coast University School of Law.
Reporting Status | U.S. Reporting: SEC Reporting |
Audited Financials | Audited |
Latest Report | August 4, 2020 10Q |
CIK | 0001141240 |
Fiscal Year End | 12/31 |
OTC Marketplace | OTCQB |
Market Value1 | $129,851,894 | a/o Sep 24, 2020 | |
Authorized Shares | 1,100,000,000 | a/o Dec 31, 2016 | |
Outstanding Shares | 914,449,957 | a/o Sep 24, 2020 | |
-Restricted | Not Available | ||
-Unrestricted | Not Available | ||
Held at DTC | Not Available | ||
Float | 487,690,350 | a/o Dec 31, 2017 | |
Par Value | No Par Value |
Shareholders of Record | 217 | a/o Dec 31, 2017 |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |