Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
zdog, vegas, Monterey. Thanks for your responses.
I think that Schwab does what it wants and post the dividends at the end of the day, even though the file may be received earlier during the day. This way, Schwab keeps the money an extra day or two.
Just spoke to my Schwab rep…TD Ameritrade always posted dividends early in advance of receipt from the company. Schwab does not post dividends until receipt from the company. Those coming from TD Ameritrade aren’t used to this practice. I too expected the dividend early today.
Fish, Yes and I do not find it a problem.
Always have shown up in Schwab later in the day.
Need help about IDCC dividend payment by my broker
Recently, (9-1-2023) my account was moved from Ameritrade to Charles Schwab through the merger of the two companies.
Ameeritrade ALWAYS had my dividends in my account at 7:30 AM. Only on a rare occasion, would a dividend of another company be credited dmid-day.
Since the merger, Schwab would NOT credit me until as late as 7:30 in the evening, and I could not move the funds until the next day.
Anyone experiencing the same issue with Schwab ? ? ?
Thanks for your help.
Does anyone have any thoughts on why IDCC has hedged their convertible bonds to $125? My only guess is a potential buyout by management once they have lowered the share count substantially.
Paullee - Thanks for this link concerning Avanci's new video patent pool. I have been searching for direct involvement between Interdigital and this video effort by Avanci.
Does anyone have access to this Avanci news article?
_________
Avanci launches new video codec patent programme for streaming services
Adam Houldsworth
18 October 2023
Avanci launches new video codec patent programme for streaming services
Fourth new Avanci platform of the year unveiled with 25 licensors
InterDigital Announces Date for Third Quarter 2023 Financial Results
Source: GlobeNewswire Inc.
InterDigital, Inc. (Nasdaq: IDCC), a mobile and video technology research and development company, today announced that the company will release its third quarter 2023 financial results before market open on Thursday, November 2, 2023.
InterDigital executives will host a conference call that same day at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time (ET) to discuss the company's performance.
For a live Internet webcast of the conference call, visit www.interdigital.com and click on the “Webcast” link on the Investors page. The company encourages participants to take advantage of the Internet option.
For telephone access to the conference call, visit www.interdigital.com and click on the “Dial In Registration” link on the Investors page. Registration is necessary to obtain a dial in phone number and PIN to join.
An Internet replay of the conference call will be available on InterDigital’s website under Events in the Investors section. The replay will be available for one year.
About InterDigital®
InterDigital develops mobile and video technologies that are at the core of devices, networks, and services worldwide. We solve many of the industry’s most critical and complex technical challenges, inventing solutions for more efficient broadband networks, better video delivery, and richer multimedia experiences years ahead of market deployment. InterDigital has licenses and strategic relationships with many of the world’s leading technology companies. Founded in 1972, InterDigital is listed on Nasdaq.
InterDigital is a registered trademark of InterDigital, Inc.
For more information, visit: www.interdigital.com.
InterDigital Contact:
investor.relations@interdigital.com
+1 (302) 300-1857
I needed to know that. It also Leto me know I was not the only one who could not access.
If I was able to read it, I would have posted it
Paullee were you able to read the article in the link? If so, what does it say. TIA
Here is an article that would be interesting to read
Ericsson and InterDigital suits targeting Lenovo are among 220 US patent litigations it's defended Angela Morris 16 October 2023
As new patent litigation heats up against the Chinese device manufacturer in the US, Docket Navigator data reveals its litigation behaviour and record of success
https://www.iam-media.com/article/ericsson-and-interdigital-suits-targeting-lenovo-are-among-220-us-patent-litigations-its-defended?utm_source=Ericsson%2Band%2BInterDigital%2Bsuits%2Btargeting%2BLenovo%2Bare%2Bamong%2B220%2BUS%2Bpatent%2Blitigations%2Bit%2527s%2Bdefended&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=IAM%2BDaily
you mean this one
Lenovo Accused Of Infringing 5G IP, Stalling FRAND Talks
By Henrik Nilsson · Listen to article
Law360 (October 12, 2023, 9:11 PM EDT) -- Swedish telecommunications company Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has sued Lenovo and its subsidiary Motorola Mobility, alleging the Chinese company infringes patents related to 5G technology and refuses to engage in negotiations to secure a fair patent licensing deal, according to the suit filed in North Carolina federal court.
Ericsson said Wednesday that mobile phones manufactured by Motorola infringe on four Ericsson patents related to 5G technology. But Lenovo's alleged history of infringement and refusal to take a license on Ericsson's technology goes back at least 15 years, according to the complaint.
"Ericsson has filed a number of lawsuits against Lenovo and its subsidiary Motorola Mobility for patent infringement in multiple jurisdictions," an Ericsson spokesperson told Law360 in an email Thursday. "Despite our best efforts, we have been unable to reach agreement on the terms and scope of a license, and both Lenovo and Motorola Mobility are using our technology without a license."
Specifically, the patents asserted in the suit concern encryption and wireless communication technology. Ericsson alleges that it notified Lenovo in 2022 that the patents are relevant to 5G, covering Motorola's mobile phone Moto Edge+ and Lenovo computers and tablets.
Ericsson asserts four counts of patent infringement, as well as breach of obligation to negotiate in good faith and breach of contract.
But Ericsson's quarrel with Lenovo dates back to at least 2008, when the Swedish company first became aware that Lenovo infringed on patents related to 3G technology, according to the suit.
Since then, Ericsson has made several fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory, or FRAND, cross-licensing rate offers to Lenovo in accordance with global standards set out by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute, according to the suit. But the Chinese company has allegedly dodged Ericsson's negotiating attempts to avoid paying royalties for Ericsson's standard essential patents.
While Lenovo promised to respond to Ericsson's offers, the Chinese company repeatedly missed deadlines, and proposed an "unreasonably low, non-FRAND-compliant rate for a cross-license," Ericsson alleges.
"Lenovo USA's insistence that Ericsson accept an unreasonably low royalty rate, as well as Lenovo USA's strategy of delaying substantive negotiations, violates the condition of reciprocity," according to the complaint.
Additionally, Ericsson said that Lenovo has refused to sign a reasonable NDA that would allow the parties to have open and frank licensing discussions. Instead, Lenovo proposed a deal that would allow it to share Ericsson's confidential information with other companies and prevent the Swedish company from exercising its patent rights, the suit said. Lenovo also sought to retain its ability to file lawsuits against Ericsson in China, according to the complaint.
Ericsson alleges that Lenovo's stalling tactics and refusal to enter into an industry-standard NDA violates its FRAND commitment because it is "depriving Ericsson of its right as a third-party beneficiary to a license to Lenovo USA's, and its affiliated companies', Essential Patents on F/RAND terms."
"Lenovo cannot continue to benefit from its delay," Ericsson said. "In addition to finding Lenovo liable for infringing Ericsson's patents, Ericsson asks this court to resolve the dispute between the parties by declaring that Ericsson complied with its contractual F/RAND obligations and Lenovo did not."
Lenovo declined to comment on Thursday.
The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 10,425,817; 10,306,669; 11,317,342 and 11,515,893.
Paullee I am including Ericssonin my multiple lawsuits comment.
M3S
you are such a joker
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paullee maybe the multiple law suits will break Lenovo’s desire to continue holding out.
InterDigital Returns as 6G Symposium Co-Sponsor with Keynotes and Panel Sessions Shaping the 6G Vision
InterDigital, Inc.
October 12, 2023, 4:00 am
InterDigital, Inc.
InterDigital CTO Rajesh Pankaj will deliver opening keynote and InterDigital speakers will contribute to diverse panel series at the two-day industry conference
WILMINGTON, Del., Oct. 12, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- InterDigital, Inc. (Nasdaq: IDCC), a mobile and video technology research and development company, announced its return as co-sponsor of 6G Symposium alongside partners Northeastern University Institute for the Wireless Internet of Things and Next G Alliance, and host 6G World. One of the first forums of its kind, the symposium aims to increase public awareness, excitement, and engagement around articulating a strong vision for 6G.
The Fall 2023 6G Symposium will take place in Washington D.C. on October 18-19, and feature keynote speeches from industry leaders including InterDigital CTO Rajesh Pankaj and a panel series on diverse topics moderated and contributed to by InterDigital’s 6G experts alongside peers and industry contributors.
Wednesday, October 18
Opening Keynotes 10:00 – 11:15
The stakes are high for 6G in North America, and a diverse set of leaders shaping the North American landscape for 6G will present keynotes at the Symposium. InterDigital’s CTO Rajesh Pankaj will deliver a keynote titled “6G: What’s Ahead?” exploring various technology, standards, and deployment milestones along the 6G journey, and will speak alongside fellow keynoters Congresswoman Haley Stevens, Deputy Assistant to the President Anne Neuberger, Next G Alliance Managing Director Mike Nawrocki, Northeastern University Professor Tommaso Melodia, NSTAC member and CEO of Cohere Ray Dolan, and AT&T’s SVP of Technology and Network Services and Network CTO Igal Elbaz.
Panel: International 6G – What Issues Need Ironing Out Before 6G Reaches 3GPP? 1:30 – 2:15
Governments around the world have important differences in their views towards 6G priorities, deployment, and implementation, and InterDigital’s Head of Future Wireless and symposium co-organizer Doug Castor will moderate this panel discussing the critical issues that must be resolved before standards cement specific solutions and approaches. The panel will feature esteemed speakers from NTT DoCoMo, 6G Flagship at the University of Oulu, Indian Institute of Technology-Hyderabad, and Next G Alliance’s Roadmap Working Group.
Thursday, October 19
Panel: Will 6G Be a Necessary Part of Immersive Content and The Metaverse? 12:30 – 1:30
XR and metaverse applications promise to change the ways we interact and will depend on a variety of AI and spatial computing enhancements under 6G, alongside improvements in immersive content. InterDigital’s Senior Director for Wireless Innovation Ravi Pragada will join this panel discussion alongside speakers from Transmira, Digital Mind State, and Open Metaverse Interoperability Group.
Panel: Can Distributed Compute and Communications ‘Break’ The Internet or Make 6G?
4:30 – 5:30
Distributed computing and distributed communications are intertwined features critical for 6G, but they have not yet been widely implemented. InterDigital Senior Director for Wireless Bob Gazda will join speakers from VMware, Fujitsu, Ericsson, and Qualcomm as they debate and discuss the value of a distributed 6G for telecoms and internet players.
The full 6G Symposium agenda and registration details can be found here.
About InterDigital®
InterDigital develops mobile and video technologies that are at the core of devices, networks, and services worldwide. We solve many of the industry’s most critical and complex technical challenges, inventing solutions for more efficient broadband networks, better video delivery, and richer multimedia experiences years ahead of market deployment. InterDigital has licenses and strategic relationships with many of the world’s leading technology companies. Founded in 1972, InterDigital is listed on Nasdaq.
InterDigital is a registered trademark of InterDigital, Inc.
For more information, visit: www.interdigital.com.
InterDigital Contact:
Roya Stephens
Email: Roya.Stephens@interdigital.com
+1 (202) 349-1714
© Yahoo. All rights reserved.
Paullee maybe the multiple law suits will break Lenovo’s desire to continue holding out.
Sound familiar
BREAKING: Ericsson brings 5G suit against Lenovo in US
The Swedish telecoms leader alleges the Chinese mega-manufacturer doesn't deny that it needs a SEP licence but has delayed paying a fair royalty despite 10 years of negotiations.
InterDigital and the University Carlos III of Madrid (UC3M) Formalize Wireless Research Partnership
Source: GlobeNewswire Inc.
InterDigital, Inc. (Nasdaq: IDCC), a mobile and video technology research and development company, and the University Carlos III of Madrid (UC3M) have announced an expansion of their bilateral partnership in research to enable technologies that enhance future wireless networks. Specifically, InterDigital will sponsor experimental research and innovation at UC3M that explores and advances integrated sensing and communications (ISAC) in next-generation cellular systems, 5G Advanced, and 6G. This research will help unlock multi-dimensional sensing information about connected devices, unconnected objects, and their movements and surroundings to support new use cases and services.
The InterDigital and UC3M partnership reflects an important research collaboration at a time when 6G research and standardization has emerged as a priority across the European Union, United States, and other regions worldwide. The European Union’s Smart Networks and Services Joint Undertaking (SNS JU) has established the 6G Research and Innovation program to allocate funding to support a portfolio of 6G projects. InterDigital has won five of these projects and continues to collaborate with research institutions to bolster the research.
“We are excited to kick off our formal research partnership with UC3M to dive into integrated sensing and communication capabilities and deepen our understanding of the critical technologies that will shape the path to 6G,” said Rajesh Pankaj, EVP and Chief Technology Officer, InterDigital. “The esteemed research led at UC3M will be a good complement to InterDigital’s wireless expertise to produce 6G’s enabling technologies and solutions.”
“Our continued partnership with InterDigital along the past years has resulted in impactful patents, relevant contributions to standard bodies, and seminal contributions published in top venues,” declared Arturo Azcorra, Professor at UC3M and Director of IMDEA Networks. “This new agreement further strengthens our partnership that will result in spearhead discoveries in the area of integrated communications and sensing and 6G”.
With a history of partnership in Europe spanning more than a decade, InterDigital recognizes Spain and the European Union’s importance in the global 6G wireless research and standards ecosystem. Most recently, InterDigital was awarded five Horizon Europe 6G flagship projects targeting revolutionary technology advancement and experimental infrastructures.
About InterDigital ®
InterDigital develops mobile and video technologies that are at the core of devices, networks, and services worldwide. We solve many of the industry’s most critical and complex technical challenges, inventing solutions for more efficient broadband networks, better video delivery, and richer multimedia experiences years ahead of market deployment. InterDigital has licenses and strategic relationships with many of the world’s leading technology companies. Founded in 1972, InterDigital is listed on Nasdaq.
InterDigital is a registered trademark of InterDigital, Inc.
For more information, visit: www.interdigital.com.
InterDigital Contact:
Roya Stephens
Email: roya.stephens@interdigital.com
+1 (202) 349-1714
My3sons87...it is in the Federal Circuit Court of North Carolina. The filings can be accessed from the following link. See filing# 13 and filing# 14.
North_Carolina_Eastern_District_Court 5--23-cv-00493
From Filing# 14...
I. INTRODUCTION
When patent claims merely cover an abstract idea without any inventive concept, they are
invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The ’054 patent and ’933 patent both cover the abstract idea of
wirelessly transferring data, which is unpatentable under § 101. Stripped of their superfluous
verbiage, the independent claims of both patents seek to monopolize the abstract idea of
wirelessly transferring data. Using results-based functional language, the claims recite the
logical sequence of steps necessary to transfer data wirelessly, i.e., selecting data to transfer,
finding and selecting a recipient, establishing a wireless connection to the recipient, and
transferring the data. Wirelessly transferring data is a quintessential abstract idea and has been a
longstanding practice for centuries. Since the 1890’s ships at sea have relied on wirelessly
transferring data via radios to replace carrier pigeons and flags for communication.
Apart from the requirements to use certain preexisting wireless data transfer protocols
(i.e., Bluetooth and WiFi) and generic components (i.e., processors and circuitry), the claims of
the ’054 and ’933 patents cover nothing more than the same abstract idea embodied in radio
transmissions for more than a hundred years. And the inclusion of conventional wireless data transfer
protocols and generic components cannot transform these results-based functional claims into
patent-eligible subject matter.
The Federal Circuit repeatedly holds that claims drawn to wirelessly transferring data
recite nothing more than an abstract idea. And when those claims lack an inventive concept—as
with the claims here—those claims are held invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The Court and
parties should not bear the needless waste of time and resources litigating these invalid patents.
Therefore, because the patents claim unpatentable subject matter, they should be held invalid and
dismissed with prejudice.
Original Filing by IDCC at US ITC-Case# 337-TA-1373
Original Filing by IDCC at US ITC-Case# 337-TA-1373
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
In the Matter of
CERTAIN ELECTRONIC DEVICES,
INCLUDING SMARTPHONES,
COMPUTERS, TABLET COMPUTERS,
AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
Inv. No. 337-TA-1373
NOTICE OF INSTITUTION OF INVESTIGATION
Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission
ACTION: Notice
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International
Trade Commission on September 1, 2023, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, on behalf of InterDigital, Inc., InterDigital VC Holdings and InterDigital Patent
Holdings, Inc., of Wilmington, Delaware; and InterDigital Madison Patent Holdings SAS of
France. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain electronic devices, including smartphones, computers, tablet
computers, and components thereof by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 10,250,877 (“the ’877 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 8,674,859 (“the ’859
patent”); U.S. Patent No. 9,674,556 (“the ’556 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 9,173,054 (“the ’054
patent”); and U.S. Patent No. 8,737,933 (“the ’933 patent”). The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists, or is in the process of being established, as required by the
applicable Federal Statute.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the
investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, may
be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired individuals are advised
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal
on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in
gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-2000.
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet
server at https://www.usitc.gov.
2
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AUTHORITY: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 C.F.R. 210.10 (2023).
SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International
Trade Commission, on October 4, 2023, ORDERED THAT –
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an
investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1, 4, 7, and 8 of the ’877 patent; claims 10 and 15 of the
’859 patent; claims 1, 3-5, 7 and 8 of the ’566 patent; claims 1 and 23 of the ’933 patent; and
claims 1 and 23 of the ’054 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists or is in the
process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 C.F.R. 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or
category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is “smartphones,
computers, tablet computers, and components thereof”;
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as
parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are:
InterDigital, Inc.
200 Bellevue Parkway, Suite 300
Wilmington, DE 19809
InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc.
200 Bellevue Parkway, Suite 300
Wilmington, DE 19809
InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.
200 Bellevue Parkway, Suite 300
Wilmington, DE 19809
InterDigital Madison Patent Holdings SAS
3 Rue Du Colonel Moll
Paris, France 75017
3
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section
337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served:
Lenovo Group Limited
23rd Floor, Lincoln House, Taikoo Place
979 King’s Road
Quarry Bay, Hong Kong SAR
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
8001 Development Dr.,
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
Motorola Mobility LLC
222 W. Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800
Chicago, Illinois 60654
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Suite 401, Washington, D.C. 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the
named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 C.F.R. 210.13. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85
Fed. Reg. 15798 (March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission if
received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the complainants of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in
this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the
complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination
containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and
desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton
Secretary to the Commission
Issued: October 5, 2023
Paullee is motion 13 files at the Fed Ct or the ITC?
Document: 13
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Lenovo (United States) Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC
ITC To Review Lenovo Smartphone, Computer Imports
By Ryan Lynch · Listen to article
Law360 (October 6, 2023, 8:19 PM EDT) -- The U.S. International Trade Commission has agreed to investigate whether Lenovo smartphones, computers and other imports infringe five wireless file-sharing patents by InterDigital.
The ITC's Thursday notice to launch an investigation comes after InterDigital Inc. and related entities — InterDigital VC Holdings, InterDigital Patent Holdings Inc. and InterDigital Madison Patent Holdings SAS — filed an ITC complaint on Sept. 1 alleging Lenovo violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act by importing smartphones, computers, tablet computers and other components that infringe InterDigital's patents.
They accuse Lenovo Group Ltd., Lenovo (U.S.) Inc. and subsidiary Motorola Mobility LLC of failing to pay a "fair share" for using patents related to AOMedia Video 1 and VP9 specifications, which allow for "delivery and consumption of an enormous amount of video content" online.
As an example, the patents are used in Apple's AirDrop service, according to the complaint, and companies including Apple have opted to license InterDigital's patents.
InterDigital has asked the ITC to issue a limited exclusion order against Lenovo, along with the issuance of cease-and-desist orders, based on alleged Section 337 violations.
The ITC's initiation of the investigation means the matter will be referred to one of the agency's administrative law judges. After conducting a hearing, the administrative law judge will make an initial determination on the merits of the case that is then subject to ITC review.
InterDigital had less luck at the Federal Circuit Friday, where a panel issued a pair of one-line orders upholding the invalidation of its patent claims, albeit different patents. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board had trimmed those wireless communication patents in a challenge requested by Lenovo and Motorola.
The companies and InterDigital's counsel did not respond to requests for comment about the ITC matter. Federal Circuit counsel for Lenovo and InterDigital declined to comment Friday.
The patents-at-issue at the ITC are U.S. Patent Nos. 10,250,877; 8,674,859; 9,674,556; 9,173,054; and 8,737,933. The patents-in-suit at the Federal Circuit are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,199,726 and 9,456,449.
Paullee thanks for the confirmation
yes, and as previously posted they have taken them to court in the US
Paullee so this decision published today should have no effect on the stock especially since Mot/Len has been found to infringe patents in the UK. Could IDCC also take them to court in the US using the comparable Uk/USA issued patents?
Paullee that patent decision was decided at the USPTO PTAB in 2022. And appealed by IDCC.
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 28
571-272-7822
Date: January 26, 2022
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________
BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ____________
LENOVO HOLDING COMPANY, INC., LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., and MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,
Petitioner,
v.
INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Patent Owner.
____________
IPR2020-01413 Patent 8,199,726 B2
Wow...Monday is not going to be good either assuming today's market did not know about these rulings.
Not a good day for IDCC
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit ______________________
INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
Appellant
v.
LENOVO HOLDING COMPANY, INC., LENOVO
(UNITED STATES) INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY
LLC,
Appellees
______________________
2022-1592
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-
01413.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MATTHEW A. ARGENTI, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich &
Rosati, PC, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by WESLEY EUGENE DERRYBERRY, Washington,
DC; MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Seattle, WA.
JOSEPH A. MICALLEF, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington,
DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by SCOTT
BORDER, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC.
Case: 22-1592 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 10/06/2023
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 6, 2023
Date
Case: 22-1592 Document: 50 Page: 2 Filed: 10/06/2023
==========================================================
2nd case
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit ______________________
INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
Appellant
v.
LENOVO HOLDING COMPANY, INC., LENOVO
(UNITED STATES) INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY
LLC,
Appellees
______________________
2022-1924
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-
01494.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MATTHEW A. ARGENTI, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich &
Rosati, PC, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by WESLEY EUGENE DERRYBERRY, Washington,
DC; MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Seattle, WA.
JOSEPH A. MICALLEF, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington,
DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by SCOTT
BORDER, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC.
Case: 22-1924 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 10/06/2023
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 6, 2023
Date
Case: 22-1924 Document: 41 Page: 2 Filed: 10/06/2023
InterDigital Raises Its Dividend, But It's A Complex Opportunity
Oct. 02, 2023 10:40 AM ETInterDigital, Inc. (IDCC)1 Like
Michael Wiggins De Oliveira
Investing Group Leader
Follow
Summary
InterDigital has recently increased its dividend and engaged in significant stock buybacks.
InterDigital's modest organic growth and uncertain future trajectory pose challenges for investors.
IDCC stock's valuation at around 18x forward free cash flows raises questions about its near-term attractiveness.
I am Michael Wiggins De Oliveira. I focus on the opportunity to profit from "the Great Energy Transition" using a traditional value investing methodology. I lead the investing group Deep Value Returns.
DKosig/iStock via Getty Images
Investment Thesis
InterDigital (NASDAQ:IDCC) is a research and development company primarily focused on wireless, visual, and related technologies. Its revenues came from the licensing of its patents.
As we surmise this analysis, what stands before us is a less than straightforward thesis, with enough bullish and bearish arguments for both sides of the trade.
On the one hand, InterDigital has recently raised its dividend payout by 14% y/y, on top of repurchasing around 12% of its stock so far in 2023.
On the other hand, InterDigital's growth rates leave a lot to be desired and I'm not sure that paying around 18x forward free cash flows is such a cheap valuation. But is that enough to warrant shorting the stock? I'm not sure. And yet, the stock is around 11% shorted already.
Yes, the business may not be particularly exciting. And while I recognize that there are far racier names around, at the same time, is one here to make money or to waste time (and capital) to chase racy stocks?
On balance, I find myself neutral on this name.
InterDigital's Near-Term Prospects
InterDigital engages in research and development to create cutting-edge technologies in wireless communication, video, and AI. They then monetize these innovations through licensing agreements with companies across various industries, contributing to the advancement of global technology standards.
InterDigital specializes in wireless and related technologies. Their core mission revolves around pioneering advancements that enable immersive, connected experiences across a wide array of communication services.
InterDigital's prospects extend to its patent portfolio, which holds nearly 30,000 patents and patent applications. Licensing these patents is a primary revenue source for the company, with license agreements secured from prominent players such as Apple, Samsung, Google, and more.
These licenses find applications in wireless communications, consumer electronics (''CE''), personal computing, and automobiles, see below.
IDCC Q2 segments
As you can see here, the vast majority of its business relates to the smartphone market. Even if the Consumer Electronics, IoT/Auto is delivering some growth, that's overshadowed by its lackluster progress in its Smartphone segment.
Moreover, during its earnings call, InterDigital noted the addition of new licensees. Arguing that the addition of new licensees in these areas emphasizes their ability to capitalize on opportunities across multiple verticals.
With this backdrop, let's now examine its financials.
Revenue Growth Rates Require Interpretation
IDCC revenue growth rates
Recall, InterDigital's Q1 2023 saw its revenues jump. Note, that the strong increase in revenues was due to the positive settlement of the Lenovo trial. That isn't an underlying organic jump in InterDigital's revenue growth rates.
In fact, the business is growing at a very slow clip. The organic revenues are fairly stable at approximately $100 million per quarter. And immediately we get to the heart of the argument that is weighing on the stock.
Bears would argue that it's difficult to ascertain the medium-term trajectory of the business. As we look out to 2024, what sort of growth rates are reasonable? 5%? 10%? Or perhaps, we'll end up seeing negative growth rates?
One must form a strong view of this element before one builds substantial conviction in this stock.
InterDigital's Dividend Increases 14% Y/Y
Typically, I would say that there are enough hairs on this business to assert it with a sell rating. However, this is where the plot thickens.
On the one hand, we can see that InterDigital's current deferred revenues are smaller than they were a year ago.
IDCC Q2 2023
Deferred revenues are an indicator of future revenues to be recognized. And the red arrow doesn't inspire much hope.
On the other hand, InterDigital has been actively repurchasing shares, reducing outstanding shares by 12% since the beginning of the year. Furthermore, together with its reduced share count, InterDigital has increased its dividend by slightly over 14%, so that the yield now stands at just a nudge below 2%.
Consequently, even though InterDigital's cash flows are going to be bumpy, the fact of the matter is that the stock is meaningfully shorted, and I'm not convinced there's enough here to warrant shorting the stock.
The Bottom Line
InterDigital primarily focuses on researching and developing wireless technologies. The company generates its revenue through patent licensing agreements with prominent industry players. While InterDigital recently increased its dividend by 14% and has embraced a substantial share buyback program in 2023, its growth rates have been modest, and its valuation at approximately 18x forward free cash flows may not be considered cheap.
The debate surrounding the stock centers on its sluggish organic growth, with questions about its future trajectory and the potential for negative growth rates in 2024.
Despite these concerns, InterDigital, Inc.'s active share repurchases and increased dividend yield of close to 2% make it a complex proposition, especially given its significant short interest. In conclusion, I find myself adopting a neutral stance on this company's prospects.
InterDigital and the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IIT-K) Formalize Wireless Research Partnership
Source: GlobeNewswire Inc.
InterDigital, Inc. (Nasdaq: IDCC), a mobile and video technology research and development company, and the Indian Institute of Technology at Kanpur (IIT-K) have announced a bilateral research partnership to develop enabling technologies that impact future wireless standards. Specifically, InterDigital will sponsor research and innovation at IIT-K that advances MIMO (Multiple-Input, Multiple-Output) systems to achieve the improved spectrum efficiency and network coverage required for 5G Advanced and 6G network deployments. The research will support critical advancements enabling networks to scale and meet growing bandwidth and coverage demands of advanced applications like metaverse experiences, holographic communications, and digital twins.
The InterDigital and IIT-K partnership is aligned with the growing collaboration between India and the United States around 6G research and standardization. The partnership follows a joint statement from the two countries at the recent G20 Summit highlighting the importance of joint research and development in 6G technologies while acknowledging IIT-K as a key collaborator.
“The 6G capabilities we imagine today will be realized through cutting-edge research and strong collaboration, and we are happy to have a partner like IIT-K to dive deeper into critical technologies like MIMO that will enable our networks to support ever more connected experiences,” said Rajesh Pankaj, EVP and Chief Technology Officer, InterDigital. “We’re excited to support and work alongside the researchers at IIT-K.”
Professor Rohit Budhiraja, who will be leading the research effort at IIT-K added, "The partnership comes at an opportune moment when India has released the Bharat 6G Vision Document and has laid the foundation to becoming a world leader in 6G technology. The academia has a major role to play both in terms of advanced research leading to 6G standardization as well as developing technology components of the 6G."
“We are proud to formalize our partnership with IIT-K to explore and expand our expertise in the advanced technologies that will shape future networks,” said Milind Kulkarni, VP and Head of Wireless Labs, InterDigital. “This engagement adds fuel to our innovation and InterDigital’s commitment to collaborate with leading universities and institutions around the world.”
With a history of partnership in India spanning a decade, InterDigital recognizes India’s importance in the global 6G wireless research and standards ecosystem, citing the recent publication of the Bharat 6G Vision document and launch of India’s 6G research and development test bed. In 2021, InterDigital became a member of the Telecommunications Standards Development Society, India (TSDSI) to support the development of India’s wireless and video markets, the region’s upgrades to 5G and beyond, and migration to high-definition mobile video.
About InterDigital ®
InterDigital develops mobile and video technologies that are at the core of devices, networks, and services worldwide. We solve many of the industry’s most critical and complex technical challenges, inventing solutions for more efficient broadband networks, better video delivery, and richer multimedia experiences years ahead of market deployment. InterDigital has licenses and strategic relationships with many of the world’s leading technology companies. Founded in 1972, InterDigital is listed on Nasdaq.
InterDigital is a registered trademark of InterDigital, Inc.
For more information, visit: www.interdigital.com.
InterDigital Contact:
Roya Stephens
Email: roya.stephens@interdigital.com
+1 (202) 349-1714
If IDCC wins their UK appeal against Lenovo it should also reflect very well in the stock.
m3s
that"s all i have
I can’t read the full article but I am assuming Lenovo is asserting a different IDCC patent(s) is/are not valid. Then the UK court settled rate is justified if not lower. Just a thought. In any case, IMO, Lenovo is not a willing licensee and this dispute will not be ending any time soon.
If IDCC doesn’t produce products which Lenovo/Motorola patent would they be infringing.
Paullee was there a patent number included in the information you posted.
IMO…Lenovo must have purchased the litigation culture when it bought Motorola Mobility from Google in 2014. I believe even Google is currently licensed for IDCC patents / technology.
and it continues
Lenovo Group Ltd. and others v. InterDigital Technology Corporation and others
Lenovo and subsidiary Motorola launched a patent claim against wireless technology company InterDigital on Sept. 24. Lenovo and InterDigital have been locked in legal battles in the U.K. and the U.S. after InterDigital accused the Chinese tech giant of infringing multiple patents on coding and wireless technology.
In early September, InterDigital began legal action against Lenovo in North Carolina federal court and the International Trade Commission alleging Lenovo and Motorola laptops, desktops, tablets and smartphones infringe four of their patents.
Read more at: https://www.law360.com/articles/1727274/uk-litigation-roundup-here-s-what-you-missed-in-london?copied=1
Fish please don’t post any more Zacks articles. It seems to me that when their articles are made public the shorts come at IDCC. jmo
Investtemp thanks for the UK appeal information.
InterDigital (IDCC) Outpaces Stock Market Gains: What You Should Know
Zacks Equity Research
Thu, September 28, 2023 at 4:45 PM CDT
In this article:
IDCC
+1.00%
In the latest trading session, InterDigital (IDCC) closed at $80.77, marking a +1% move from the previous day. This change outpaced the S&P 500's 0.59% gain on the day. Meanwhile, the Dow gained 0.35%, and the Nasdaq, a tech-heavy index, added 0.83%.
Prior to today's trading, shares of the wireless research and development company had lost 7.24% over the past month. This has lagged the Computer and Technology sector's loss of 2.71% and the S&P 500's loss of 2.84% in that time.
Investors will be hoping for strength from InterDigital as it approaches its next earnings release. The company is expected to report EPS of $1.19, up 60.81% from the prior-year quarter. Meanwhile, our latest consensus estimate is calling for revenue of $98.94 million, down 13.79% from the prior-year quarter.
For the full year, our Zacks Consensus Estimates are projecting earnings of $7.91 per share and revenue of $503.81 million, which would represent changes of +157.65% and +10.05%, respectively, from the prior year.
It is also important to note the recent changes to analyst estimates for InterDigital. These revisions help to show the ever-changing nature of near-term business trends. As such, positive estimate revisions reflect analyst optimism about the company's business and profitability.
Research indicates that these estimate revisions are directly correlated with near-term share price momentum. Investors can capitalize on this by using the Zacks Rank. This model considers these estimate changes and provides a simple, actionable rating system.
The Zacks Rank system, which ranges from #1 (Strong Buy) to #5 (Strong Sell), has an impressive outside-audited track record of outperformance, with #1 stocks generating an average annual return of +25% since 1988. The Zacks Consensus EPS estimate has moved 0.15% lower within the past month. InterDigital is holding a Zacks Rank of #3 (Hold) right now.
Digging into valuation, InterDigital currently has a Forward P/E ratio of 10.11. This represents a discount compared to its industry's average Forward P/E of 12.63.
Also, we should mention that IDCC has a PEG ratio of 0.73. The PEG ratio is similar to the widely-used P/E ratio, but this metric also takes the company's expected earnings growth rate into account. IDCC's industry had an average PEG ratio of 1.34 as of yesterday's close.
The Wireless Equipment industry is part of the Computer and Technology sector. This industry currently has a Zacks Industry Rank of 74, which puts it in the top 30% of all 250+ industries.
Is Trending Stock InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) a Buy Now?
Zacks Equity Research
Thu, September 28, 2023 at 8:00 AM CDT
InterDigital (IDCC) has recently been on Zacks.com's list of the most searched stocks. Therefore, you might want to consider some of the key factors that could influence the stock's performance in the near future.
Over the past month, shares of this wireless research and development company have returned -7.2%, compared to the Zacks S&P 500 composite's -2.8% change. During this period, the Zacks Wireless Equipment industry, which InterDigital falls in, has lost 2.3%. The key question now is: What could be the stock's future direction?
While media releases or rumors about a substantial change in a company's business prospects usually make its stock 'trending' and lead to an immediate price change, there are always some fundamental facts that eventually dominate the buy-and-hold decision-making.
Revisions to Earnings Estimates
Rather than focusing on anything else, we at Zacks prioritize evaluating the change in a company's earnings projection. This is because we believe the fair value for its stock is determined by the present value of its future stream of earnings.
We essentially look at how sell-side analysts covering the stock are revising their earnings estimates to reflect the impact of the latest business trends. And if earnings estimates go up for a company, the fair value for its stock goes up. A higher fair value than the current market price drives investors' interest in buying the stock, leading to its price moving higher. This is why empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements.
For the current quarter, InterDigital is expected to post earnings of $1.19 per share, indicating a change of +60.8% from the year-ago quarter. The Zacks Consensus Estimate has changed +0.4% over the last 30 days.
For the current fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $7.91 points to a change of +157.7% from the prior year. Over the last 30 days, this estimate has changed -0.2%.
For the next fiscal year, the consensus earnings estimate of $6.29 indicates a change of -20.5% from what InterDigital is expected to report a year ago. Over the past month, the estimate has changed -0.3%.
Having a strong externally audited track record, our proprietary stock rating tool, the Zacks Rank, offers a more conclusive picture of a stock's price direction in the near term, since it effectively harnesses the power of earnings estimate revisions. Due to the size of the recent change in the consensus estimate, along with three other factors related to earnings estimates, InterDigital is rated Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).
Projected Revenue Growth
Even though a company's earnings growth is arguably the best indicator of its financial health, nothing much happens if it cannot raise its revenues. It's almost impossible for a company to grow its earnings without growing its revenue for long periods. Therefore, knowing a company's potential revenue growth is crucial.
In the case of InterDigital, the consensus sales estimate of $98.94 million for the current quarter points to a year-over-year change of -13.8%. The $503.81 million and $442.7 million estimates for the current and next fiscal years indicate changes of +10.1% and -12.1%, respectively.
Last Reported Results and Surprise History
InterDigital reported revenues of $101.59 million in the last reported quarter, representing a year-over-year change of -18.5%. EPS of $1.30 for the same period compares with $0.69 a year ago.
Compared to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $101.22 million, the reported revenues represent a surprise of +0.37%. The EPS surprise was +7.44%.
The company beat consensus EPS estimates in each of the trailing four quarters. The company topped consensus revenue estimates each time over this period.
Valuation
No investment decision can be efficient without considering a stock's valuation. Whether a stock's current price rightly reflects the intrinsic value of the underlying business and the company's growth prospects is an essential determinant of its future price performance.
Comparing the current value of a company's valuation multiples, such as its price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-sales (P/S), and price-to-cash flow (P/CF), to its own historical values helps ascertain whether its stock is fairly valued, overvalued, or undervalued, whereas comparing the company relative to its peers on these parameters gives a good sense of how reasonable its stock price is.
The Zacks Value Style Score (part of the Zacks Style Scores system), which pays close attention to both traditional and unconventional valuation metrics to grade stocks from A to F (an An is better than a B; a B is better than a C; and so on), is pretty helpful in identifying whether a stock is overvalued, rightly valued, or temporarily undervalued.
InterDigital is graded B on this front, indicating that it is trading at a discount to its peers. Click here to see the values of some of the valuation metrics that have driven this grade.
Bottom Line
The facts discussed here and much other information on Zacks.com might help determine whether or not it's worthwhile paying attention to the market buzz about InterDigital. However, its Zacks Rank #3 does suggest that it may perform in line with the broader market in the near term.
InterDigital To Challenge Lenovo's Landmark FRAND Win By Alex Baldwin Law360, London
(September 21, 2023, 6:47 PM BST) -- An appeals court will hear the entirety of wireless and video technology company InterDigital's appeal in a high-profile spat with Chinese giant Lenovo over fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory licensing rates for InterDigital's patents.
Judge Richard Arnold said in a newly public Tuesday order that the Court of Appeal will reconsider all contested grounds of the landmark ruling that held Lenovo should fork over a $184.9 million lump sum to InterDigital, after High Court Judge James Mellor granted a far more limited appeal back in June.
According to the brief order, each of InterDigital's four grounds of appeal had a real prospect of success, contrary to Judge Mellor's initial decision that refused all four of InterDigital's grounds.
InterDigital sued Lenovo alleging that the company was using its patented technology without a license.
Three of the five patents levied by InterDigital were considered valid and essential by the High Court, which then moved to determine whether terms to license those patents floated by both InterDigital and Lenovo were fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory, or FRAND.
Lenovo asked to pay $80 million for a six-year license for the patents, with a 15% leeway, whereas InterDigital argued that it should pay around $337 million.
Judge Mellor ruled in June that Lenovo should pay a lump sum of $138.7 million to InterDigital, which factored in past sales of its products — noting that there was "no doubt" that Lenovo had prevailed in this trial and was the "overall winner."
InterDigital sought permission to appeal on four grounds. The primary ground concerned the specific licensing rate determined by Judge Mellor, arguing that it was not FRAND for the court to allow the effects of certain discounts to "depress" the rates of the license.
Judge Mellor agreed in a follow-up judgment that there were "some points of principal" but that they were "wrapped up" in a bid to get the Court of Appeal to accept an argument which he had rejected at "several different levels."
The High Court also dismissed InterDigital's remaining appeals, which focused on certain "economic adjustments" made to the licensing rate, the court's rejection of InterDigital's "top down cross-check" model for determining rates, and the finding that InterDigital was an "unwilling licensor."
However, Judge Mellor allowed InterDigital to appeal against the "points of principal" in which he determined the FRAND judgment, noting that it was possible to "take them in a slightly different order."
He also gave Lenovo the go-ahead to cross-appeal whether limitation periods play a role in the relationship of "willing" licensors and licensees.
The judgment also determined that Lenovo must pay an additional $46.2 million, upping the lump sum the Chinese company owes to $184.9 million.
But now, the Court of Appeal has ruled that InterDigital's primary ground of appeal concerning the specific licensing rate had a real chance of success, and that it was "unsatisfactory" to limit the appeal in the way Judge Mellor had.
Judge Arnold also granted permission to appeal on the remaining three grounds, noting that Judge Mellor had refused these grounds because he had considered that they were "contingent" upon the primary ground of appeal succeeding.
Representatives for InterDigital and Lenovo did not immediately respond to requests for comment Thursday.
In the High Court proceedings, InterDigital was represented by Adrian Speck KC, Mark Chacksfield KC and Edmund Eustace of 8 New Square, instructed by Gowling WLG.
Lenovo was represented by Daniel Alexander KC of 8 New Square and James Segan KC and Ravi Mehta of Blackstone Chambers, instructed by Kirkland & Ellis International LLP.
The case is InterDigital Technology Corporation v. Lenovo Group Ltd., case number CA-2023-001492, in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales.
Short interest as of 9/15 is 3.09M. EOM
Followers
|
880
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
1
|
Posts (Total)
|
433140
|
Created
|
01/05/02
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards:
To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service. |
It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.
If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.
Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.
Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |