Not a good day for IDCC
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit ______________________
INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
Appellant
v.
LENOVO HOLDING COMPANY, INC., LENOVO
(UNITED STATES) INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY
LLC,
Appellees
______________________
2022-1592
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-
01413.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MATTHEW A. ARGENTI, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich &
Rosati, PC, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by WESLEY EUGENE DERRYBERRY, Washington,
DC; MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Seattle, WA.
JOSEPH A. MICALLEF, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington,
DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by SCOTT
BORDER, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC.
Case: 22-1592 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 10/06/2023
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 6, 2023
Date
Case: 22-1592 Document: 50 Page: 2 Filed: 10/06/2023
==========================================================
2nd case
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit ______________________
INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
Appellant
v.
LENOVO HOLDING COMPANY, INC., LENOVO
(UNITED STATES) INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY
LLC,
Appellees
______________________
2022-1924
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-
01494.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MATTHEW A. ARGENTI, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich &
Rosati, PC, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by WESLEY EUGENE DERRYBERRY, Washington,
DC; MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Seattle, WA.
JOSEPH A. MICALLEF, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington,
DC, argued for appellees. Also represented by SCOTT
BORDER, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC.
Case: 22-1924 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 10/06/2023
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 6, 2023
Date
Case: 22-1924 Document: 41 Page: 2 Filed: 10/06/2023
