Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Good to see you back in the fray 'tim'. Was starting to worry that you sold out and moved on. I was wondering why you had stopped posting. Yep, as far as XXII and SPIHF you hit the nail directly on the head. New investors who are not subs to the n/l and GREED (margin players who I am sure got banged) have had a play on XXII that imo will all be over very soon. Best advice keep on course and all us longs will be on easy street soon enough. Wish I had more cash to buy buy buy at these prices but I have a full tank already. But it is all good!
You got it timorr. I couldn't be more comfortable with my position.
Interesting how we read on the XXII board all the doubts about management based only on the fact the share price has fallen . They doubt the ability for Century 22 to produce Red Sun when anyone who has done any DD at all knows that Joe has done this before . This is a all star management team , I realize that all these new posters and bashing is part of the growing pains of becoming a big stock but I rarely post anymore because it becomes tiring to read the same garbage over and over. I know we will have the last laugh however.
Never been on a Rollercoaster like XXII, the G-Force is enormous, but I'll resist.
While nobody likes to fly during turbulence, it is a little more reassuring when a pilot acknowledges it. We expected a pullback and after that Big run, it is not surprising that the pullback was severe.
With any high flying growth stock, pullbacks should be expected.
Thanks Van for this great update on XXII.
Scott, the updates on XXII during this remarkable period are very much appreciated... I think you nailed it... one of the things I keep coming back to is that BTI snooped aroung incognito for a full year, then snooped around for a second year, then got out the checkbook and wrote a check... that is some serious validation of the science...
Thanks for todays update Van. Just FYI, I didn't get an email about it, just happened to be overlooking the DD on the two.
Of course unless the company is making $$ giving away cheap shares, lol
Unfortunately nobody knows what the TTB permit means.
I assume they would PR start of production?
I don't think it would be a bad idea for management to issue a press release indicating what many longs know is nothing material.
IMO, the TTB permit news was a little lost within the uplist noise. Lots of noise.
So is it safe to assume that they could already by in production as we speak? Or they have to wait for the MSA approval?
We put out a quick summary on XXII yesterday to subscribers.
Van- What is happening with XXII ?
Cormark ups Sphere 3D's price target to $10.50
"we believe the transaction is accretive to earnings of $0.05-0.10 on an annualized basis, excluding amortization of acquired intangibles, without considering revenue synergies"
Danger of liquid nicotine for e-cigarettes
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/business/selling-a-poison-by-the-barrel-liquid-nicotine-for-e-cigarettes.html?_r=0
This report could help XXII
If it could fit in that bucket
Those better be Platnium;O)
LOL... me too...
Goose bumps again on your update. Thank YOU! Yes, I do need to dumb it down, but WoW, the SPIHF story is getting better and better! Looking for these Geese to lay the golder EGG!
Sphere 3D Closes U.S. $5 Million Convertible Debt FinancingFont size: A | A | A
2:41 PM ET 3/21/14 | GlobeNewswire
RELATED QUOTES
2:39 PM ET 3/21/14
Symbol Last % Chg
FBCD
0.01 -20.00%
SPIHF
6.94 2.97%
Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes
Sphere 3D Corporation (TSX-V:ANY) (the "Company"), developer of Glassware 2.0(TM) foundational thin client technology, announced today it has completed a financing with FBC Holdings S.A.R.L., an entity whose ultimate shareholders are managed by Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. (collectively, "FBC"), whereby FBC subscribed for a convertible secured debenture of the Corporation in the principal amount of U.S. $5,000,000.
The Debenture matures on March 21, 2018, being the fourth anniversary of the date of issuance, and bears interest at 8% per annum, to be paid semi-annually in arrears, in cash or shares at the option of the Corporation. The Debenture is convertible at any time into common shares in the capital of the Corporation (the "Conversion Right") at U.S. $7.50 per share (the "Conversion Price"). The Corporation shall have the right to force FBC to convert the Debenture if the trading price of the common shares for 10 successive days in which the shares actually trade on the TSX Venture Exchange (the "TSXV") or other principal exchange, exceeds 150% of the Conversion Price.
The Debenture and any common shares issued upon exercise of the Conversion Right are subject to a four-month hold period from the issuance date of the Debenture in accordance with the policies of the TSXV and applicable securities laws. No broker or other fees are payable by the Corporation in connection with entering into of the Debenture. The proceeds of the Debenture will be used to partially fund the Corporation's previously announced transaction to purchase substantially all of the assets of V3 Systems, Inc., and for sales and marketing, general corporate and working capital purposes.
The Debenture and any common shares issued upon exercise of the Conversion Right have not been registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons except in certain transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
About Sphere 3D Corporation
Sphere 3D Corporation (TSX-V:ANY) is a Mississauga, Ontario based virtualization technology solution provider whose patent pending Glassware 2.0(TM) technology makes it possible for incompatibl
SPIHF/ANY halted:
IIROC Trading Halt - ANY
Print
Alert
Sphere 3D Corporation (TSXV:ANY)
Intraday Stock Chart
Today : Friday 21 March 2014
Click Here for more Sphere 3D Corporation Charts.
VANCOUVER, March 21, 2014 /CNW/ - The following issues have been halted by IIROC:
Company: SPHERE 3D CORPORATION
TSX-Venture Symbol: ANY
Reason: At the Request of the Company Pending News
Halt Time (ET): 13:36
IIROC can make a decision to impose a temporary suspension (halt) of trading in a security of a publicly-listed company. Trading halts are implemented to ensure a fair and orderly market. IIROC is the national self-regulatory organization which oversees all investment dealers and trading activity on debt and equity marketplaces in Canada.
Giovanni, Ah, the trust curse. If the monthly checks are enough for the good life, your children have received the kiss of 'death'. Or should I rephrase that...'will'. They have been condemned to a kind of zombie state, unless they have unusual power within themselves.
Cheers, Pontoon
Giovanni Member Level Thursday, 03/20/14 05:50:20 PM
Re: Pontoon post# 3671
Post # of 3673
Pontoon
Unfortuanatly I cannot touch their money.
My father left them their trust.
Gio
Pontoon
Unfortuanatly I cannot touch their money.
My father left them their trust.
Gio
"Going to need some therapy after this week, just a heads up, lol!"
LOL
Giovanni, I can't help but jump in here. My father married an heiress (from whom I got nothing) so I have some experience with the type of folks you highlight. Most of them end up feeling entitled, bored, unmotivated and just plain f**kd up.
One of my heroes is the son of the Baskin Robbins heir. He didn't want to end up like his kind and refused the fortune, retreating to a cabin in Alaska for over ten years and living on practically nothing, off the grid and close to the land. While there he wrote a book which became a best seller and made him millions. Now that takes balls.
However, I don't fault you Giovanni for keeping your inherited dough. And I applaud you for being totally honest about it. That said, you are probably a very fine person with no pretensions, kind to those less fortunate than yourself and realistic about the dangers of inherited wealth. If I were in your shoes I'd tell your kids that you will provide them with enough so they won't starve but not enough to talk through their noses. I'm sure you know what I mean. Further, if they start a meaningful enterprise which provides employment for others, you will set aside a fund to enable that enterprise to grow quickly and succeed. If they do nothing constructive, the money will go to a charity instead. Not perfect but better than keeping them awash for life in country club funds.
Good luck. Pontoon
Giovanni Member Level Thursday, 03/20/14 12:53:16 PM
Re: TTommy post# 3663
Post # of 3669
Tommy
One of the best examples I can remember is the doctor who invented
Valium. He was very highly paid for the time.
Hoffman wanted to give him a 2 million dollar bonus and more shares.
He turned them down.
He did not want his children to be spoiled.
He was correct.
Not confusing if you have been there.
I also grow up in a community where many had trust funds.I know the %`s. If you like your children acting like Bieber give them a trust fund.
In the 50`s people thought it was the thing to do. They were wrong.
That commuity is still loaded with wealthy people with way too much money.
If my father had thought it out he could have given us the money
when we turned 50 as we would have gathered enough life experience to cope with it.
Gio
Sounds like a smart man who worked hard for his money and does not want his offsprings to just blow it into nothing.
Yes 'gio' great wealth in the form of trust funds have to have conditions. An example that I was witness to was a professor of mine long ago. He had stipulations for his children with regard to their receiving an inheritance written into a living will. He had directed his attorney to draw up a document with specific goals that the children were required to meet in order to secure their inheritance. He had even anticipated if the goals were not met by his children the funds would be directed to several charities that he had been involved in. All goals conveyed to the children had specific timelines to achieve.
Have a great day.
Someone has to really educate the young people of the cycle of life and $$$. There is no such thing as free lunch. All that privilages has to come from somewhere.
Nail, Hammer
"I'm Entitled"
The town I grew up in was so "Entitled" our school
mascot was "The Whealthy Towners."
No Tigers, Indians, Bull Dogs,etc.
Gio
Tommy
One of the best examples I can remember is the doctor who invented
Valium. He was very highly paid for the time.
Hoffman wanted to give him a 2 million dollar bonus and more shares.
He turned them down.
He did not want his children to be spoiled.
He was correct.
Not confusing if you have been there.
I also grow up in a community where many had trust funds.I know the %`s. If you like your children acting like Bieber give them a trust fund.
In the 50`s people thought it was the thing to do. They were wrong.
That commuity is still loaded with wealthy people with way too much money.
If my father had thought it out he could have given us the money
when we turned 50 as we would have gathered enough life experience to cope with it.
Gio
Interesting discussion...it could be lethal if you also cultivate "I'm Entitled" complex
My daughter works for Dept of Navy (with TS clearance) High level...she indicated that the biggest problem they and their defense contractors have with new employees right out of college is the "entitlement" head they have for just showing up...
They have been "brainwashed" by our "leader/recent society" in the last 6 years to believe that since they are were hired ...they are "entitled"...vacations, pay raises to highest levels..etc...regardless of work or work product...and rules dont apply to them....
Thankfully first year is probation in Dept of Navy / Defense Department and 4 were terminated in her department recently...
They have started an indoctrination program.."This is real life...get used to it or leave"
That's irritating to hear kids that are " set for life" take things for granted, even sometimes their life. They have never been around the other end or the middle, it's easy to blame it on the parents. You had or have a choice to walk away from that if you think that would make you a better person or less a slave from the giver; I have been around people of what I am describing, I respect each back ground and their decisions, but the one with less had no option whatsoever, but to work hard to live and battle the odds which sometimes doesn't come out positive. One is not born with SELF ESTEEM, you get that along the way and there are many ways you can obtain it. It's nice that your parents gave you an option if "choice", some of us don't. So cherish it or give it up .
Your generalization and assumptions are confusing at best 'gio'. How can you make statements such as the one below? You have no knowledge of anything outside of your own sphere of influence. Your own life experiences are not those of others nor should they be.
I just want the opportunity to say "no" to my children asking for a "billion-dollar trust fund"...(ok ... or even hundreds of millions TF)
If you'd like, I am here to help, I'll give you my bank acct number and we can transfer your inheritance $$ to me!
Bill thinks Like I do.
Bill Gates: 'Our children won't be left billion-dollar trust funds'
I had no choice my father did the nasty deed.
Welfare has nothing to do with the subject: Self Esteem
I believe nobody on welfare has self esteem.
Buffett and Gates both have children that are not spoiled.
I can tell you being set for life is not a healthy situation for children. Look at the Kennedy family. Look at my family.
I am saying people with no ambition do not get any satisfaction in life. I come from a large family where there are trust funds for generations and it has been devastating to 80% of my children and grand children.
If I could I would make them all stand on their own two feet.
Unurned Money is not what you think it is.
My same thoughts JFM! Don't want to start more politics on this board, but you nailed that one big time!
So what is the difference in impact of self-esteem or lack thereof through not having working for "inherited" monies and being "set" for life, and Obama's redistribution of wealth and subsequent "giving" of cash, food, housing and medical without the need to earn it? Its a double whammy ... they dont have to earn it and are deprived of building self-esteem and they are brainwashed into believing they deserve merely because they exist and demand it.
At least with passing on a XXII to offspring...somebody took a risk and did something constructive to get earn it and pass it on. At least the beneficiary can be proud of the provider and thankful.
you are probably correct here... the track record of those who inherit wealth, in terms of accomplishments and quality of life, is disturbingly sketchy... for human beings there does appear to be significant value in the old fashioned concept of earning it...
Oh ya
$52 a share for a company that can be bought for $8 to 10..
LOL
"XXII becoming another Phillip Morris would set my descendants for life."
You would be doing them no favors.
What a waste, they will have no ambition. Why would you want lazy offspring. Let then earn their own self worth.
lol...yes ditto
"The proposed buyout would set me to do as I wish for the rest of my life. XXII becoming another Phillip Morris would set my descendants for life."
excellent analysis... and delightful closing statement... which i copied above just because it brings a smile to my face... always enjoy your take Pete... even when i disagree with it, which is seldom... you are spot on that a 3 billion dollar buyout would be a steal for the buyer... BTI will likely come calling if the company can be had for that amount... pure speculation on my part...
so yes... $50 a share makes me a millionaire... and sets my sites on an earlier than expected retirement goal... i could surely live with that... but the Monsantoesque outcome... if it should materialize... would be x20 (w/Mon market cap just shy of 60B)... ultimately that decision will be made by larger shareholders than ourselves... either way we win... glta...
Thanks for the update Van that was the therapy I needed :)
Followers
|
72
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
3756
|
Created
|
05/02/13
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderator einstock | |||
Assistants timorr wvumountaineer78 |
Our philosophy:
Our goal is to find companies that can show at least a 1,000% return on our investment. Some call these “Ten-Baggers”. In order to achieve a tenfold return on our investing dollar, valuation plays a key role.
We are often asked just how does a company make the cut...or what are we looking for when highlighting a company for the HTFBSN? Simply put, our goal is to find a company with disruptive technology that is part of a major investing wave, along with that potential 1,000% return. Hence, our Big Stock designation!
Our definition of disruptive is any technology or service that either changes or creates an entire industry.
A key criteria for making the cut is that the company HAS TO HAVE the ability to become a Big Stock. What does that mean?
Well to give a little history, back when we invested in the venture capital (VC) and angel investing worlds, savvy investors in that genre know that roughly seven out of ten investments would fail. The real key though, was the three investments that did indeed become success stories, would tend to deliver at least ten times our seed money in return. Of course, in order for this to happen, EACH investment had to have the potential to grow at least tenfold...but we don’t want to wait two or three years to see those returns.
As previously alluded, a company’s market capitalization, NOT ITS STOCK PRICE is a must.
Our goal is to find a company that has the potential to grow from their current valuation by at least a factor of ten. Does the technology have the potential to be worth at least ten times the current valuation, or can the company grow their revenues with this technology so it could command a valuation ten times greater than its current market capitalization?
Valuation is key!
It is very rare to find a company that is valued over $100M having the capability to grow tenfold. It happens, but once a company reaches the $100M valuation, if there really is some potential to become that “Ten-Bagger”, institutions tend to discover it and/or they are made an offer they can’t refuse before having a chance to reach that zenith. That is why we tend to stay UNDER the $100M valuation for our ideas. Of course, the lack of research makes our work harder, but that is where we feel the Big Stock returns are found. The lack of research and institutional coverage also means the masses have not discovered or recognized its potential.
For example, let’s take one of our first highlighted companies in the original issue of HTFBSN. That company was Destiny Media Technologies DSNY This particular recommendation was in the .36 - .40 cent range at that time with a market capitalization (valuation) of approximately $20M. We originally thought that Destiny’s disruptive technology was easily worth $200M, hence it fell into our Big Stock return criteria. Fast forward to today, the first week of May 2013, and Destiny’s present market capitalization is approximately $44M. We think our original assessment and vision of the company’s technology worth is now north of our initial estimate of $200M. But the real importance of this example, is that for our original subscribers; they still have the chance to realize that “Ten-Bagger” return!
On the other hand, in keeping with our theme of finding companies under HTFBSN’s ceiling of $100M, let’s now look at a similar company to Destiny. This particular company had recovered from a low in 2008 below 20 cents a share, to a high in 2009 of 75 cents a share and a market capitalization (valuation) of approximately $130M at its peak. The company we are contrasting here to drive home our “valuation is key” philosophy is On2 Technologies. Our subscribers may remember that we have previously mentioned in our coverage on Destiny, that On2 Technologies was acquired by Google in 2010, which offered $133.9M for the acquisition. Remember what we stated earlier... that institutions discover companies once they reach that key threshold of $100M, or they are made an offer they just can’t refuse! In this case mighty Google wanted what On 2 Technologies had.
Furthermore, logic and common sense dictate that companies with market capitalizations of $100M and above, rising tenfold to become $1B companies are very difficult to find. They are few and far between, along with just about everything else happening in the investor’s favor to achieve those kinds of returns! Now ask yourself, what are those odds?
That is why we say valuation, and not stock price, is truely a key element in our highlighted companies chosen for presentation to our subscribers.
Sometimes the difficulty of investing this way is waiting on the masses to catch up
The difference between investing as a Venture Capitalist and being a Joe Public investor, is the liquidity factor. As a VC investor, only an IPO or buyout can provide the ability to liquidate our investment. As a public stock investor, liquidity is as easy as clicking your mouse.
Several CEO’s have told us that we do a pretty good of telling their story, but the bottom line is where it counts. The nanocap world is filled with great stories. How many glossy flyers do you get in the mail each week? The trick is to find a great story that is close to generating revenues or finding institutional interest. Do they have enough cash to survive? How long is their sales cycle? Do they own the technology or are they licensing it? Do they have any death-spiral financing? What is the catalyst that will generate revenues?
We invest like VC’s, but we have a built in advantage... namely liquidity!
The HTFBSN looks at hundreds of companies each month with the proprietary BigStockular tool discussed in our book How To Find Big Stocks. In a typical year this tool might help us find a half-dozen companies that we feel have Big Stock potential. We don't invest in them as day trades or swing trades, but with the intent of a minimum six-month hold to give the company a chance to deliver. Unlike a VC, if we don't like what we see, we can liquidate our position. Advantage us!
In addition, our annual subscribers and those loyal monthly subscribers of six months or more are provided a link to the companies we are performing due diligence on, courtesy of our monthly BigStockular review. These companies might not make the half-dozen or so that actually get officially highlighted for subscribers in the HTFBSN, but some of these could potentially reward subscribers with a positive return on their investment dollars as well, if they choose to purchase. This is an added benefit for loyal readers that is not offered by our competitors!
We love new ideas but if you are going to post a stock, which you think has Big Stock potential, please make sure it meets this criteria:
Does the company have disruptive or breakthrough technology?
Does the technology solve a problem?
Is the technology proprietary?
Is the industry or space for this technology over $1B?
Does the product/service impact the consumer, enterprise or both?
Is adoption expected to occur within 1-2 years?
Does the company have a clean share structure and the ability to raise money?
Is there a recurring revenue business model?
Is the company’s valuation less than $100M (or near it)?
Has the company been listed on Pumps and Dumps?
If your idea has ever been listed on PumpsandDumps.com, it will be deleted immediately.
Posts Today
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
3756
|
Posters
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Assistants
|
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |