Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
in recent months this is trading once or twice a month....
Bettin someone somewhere thought he could pop this on radar with a defibrilator hit... good luck with that.
I'm over it, un-board marked! 60!
fu0k you HKBV ceo wherever you are!
61 boardmarks! Do I hear 60?
Shares for sale, CHEAP! Need cash! lol
Show of hands from among the 62 boardmarks; who's a bagholder?
oh my the HKBV scam was a classic
Minamoo might be worth something after all:
http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_18136945
Nothing? Rats! I got millions of perfectly good HKBV shares just getting moldy. lol
No volume no merger
What is "SIPP" please?
So now HKBV is about to be flopped over to the SIPP folks according to the word, LOL
Remember the post below folks I know I will.
Hat Trick Beverages Inc, Got It Productions, LLC
http://www.manta.com/c/mttts9k/hat-trick-beverages-inc
Got It Productions LLC
http://www.gotitprod.com/index.htm
Shares for sale, CHEAP! Anyone?? Rats!
Triforce: Good DD. Hat Trick Beverage was/is nothing but a mail drop somewhere in Ontario. Maybe that's where "Sender Vaiser," Twombly, and the rest of the "Dilution Gang" held their confabs. LOL
hkbv
The UPS Store Canada:2325 Hurontario St., Mississauga, ON L5A 4K4, Canada
http://www.theupsstorelocal.ca/8-Mississauga/Index.html
Principal Street Address (HKBV):2325 Hurontario St., Ste. 170, Mississauga, ON L5A 4K4, Canada
http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/BusinessEntityDetail.do?quitButtonDestination=BusinessEntityResults&nameTyp=ENT&masterFileId=20031396075&entityId2=20031396075&srchTyp=ENTITY&fileId=20061476784
Surf Kid: OK, I found the document(s). They are buried in a non-highlighted link and quite escapes detection. The Colorado SOS website is not what you would call "user friendly" and certainly implies on its activity page that HKBV is still dissolved effective 31 May 2005. In any case, I withdraw the former assertion of Hat Trick Beverage, Inc. as a currently dissolved corporation. Thank you for bringing this to the attention of the board.
I do not find the document you've indicated using ID#20031396075. Provide a link and a means of accessing the document in question.
Document processing fee
If document is filed on paper $150.00
If document is filed electronically $ 50.00
Fees & forms/cover sheets
are subject to change.
To file electronically, access instructions
for this form/cover sheet and other
information or print copies of filed
documents, visit www.sos.state.co.us
and select Business Center.
Paper documents must be typewritten or machine printed. ABOVE SPACE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Articles of Reinstatement
filed pursuant to §7-90-301, et seq. and §7-90-1003 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S)
ID Number ____________________
1. Domestic entity name of the entity ______________________________________________________
2. Following reinstatement the domestic entity name of the domestic entity shall comply with section 7-90-
1004.
3. Registered agent
(if an individual) ____________________ ______________ ______________ _____
(Last) (First) (Middle) (Suffix)
OR
(if an entity) ______________________________________________________
4. The person appointed as registered agent in the document has consented to being so appointed.
5. Registered agent street address ______________________________________________________
(Street name and number)
______________________________________________________
__________________________ CO ___________________
(City) (State) (Postal/Zip Code)
6. Registered agent mailing address ______________________________________________________
(if different from above) (Street name and number or Post Office Box information)
______________________________________________________
__________________________ _____ ____________________
(City) (State) (Postal/Zip Code)
_______________________ ______________
(Province – if applicable) (Country – if not US)
7. Principal office street address ______________________________________________________
(Street name and number)
______________________________________________________
__________________________ _____ ____________________
(City) (State) (Postal/Zip Code)
_______________________ ______________
(Province – if applicable) (Country – if not US)
Rev. 11/16/2005
1 of 3
ENCINITAS
20031396075
80202
United States
DENVER
SUITE 234
1560 BROADWAY
PRIMERA CAPITAL, LLC
CA
449 SANTA FE DRIVE
92024
United States
HAT TRICK BEVERAGE, INC.
Colorado Secretary of State
Date and Time: 11/22/2006 09:25 AM
Id Number: 20031396075
Document number: 20061476784
8. Principal office mailing address ______________________________________________________
(if different from above) (Street name and number or Post Office Box information)
______________________________________________________
__________________________ _____ ____________________
(City) (State) (Postal/Zip Code)
_______________________ ______________
(Province – if applicable) (Country – if not US)
9. Date of formation of the entity ______________________
(mm/dd/yyyy)
10. Date of dissolution ______________________
(if known) (mm/dd/yyyy)
11. If the entity’s period of duration
as amended is less than perpetual,
state the date on which the period
of duration expires: _____________________
(mm/dd/yyyy)
OR
If the entity’s period of duration as amended is perpetual, mark this box .
12. (Optional) Delayed effective date ______________________
(mm/dd/yyyy)
13. Colorado statute under which the
entity existed immediately prior
to dissolution ______________________________________________________
14. All applicable conditions of CRS §7-90-1002 have been satisfied.
Notice:
Causing this document to be delivered to the secretary of state for filing shall constitute the affirmation or
acknowledgment of each individual causing such delivery, under penalties of perjury, that the document is the
individual's act and deed, or that the individual in good faith believes the document is the act and deed of the
person on whose behalf the individual is causing the document to be delivered for filing, taken in conformity
with the requirements of part 3 of article 90 of title 7, C.R.S., the constituent documents, and the organic
statutes, and that the individual in good faith believes the facts stated in the document are true and the
document complies with the requirements of that Part, the constituent documents, and the organic statutes.
This perjury notice applies to each individual who causes this document to be delivered to the secretary of
state, whether or not such individual is named in the document as one who has caused it to be delivered.
15. Name(s) and address(es) of the
individual(s) causing the document
to be delivered for filing ____________________ ______________ ______________ _____
(Last) (First) (Middle) (Suffix)
______________________________________________________
(Street name and number or Post Office Box information)
______________________________________________________
__________________________ _____ ____________________
(City) (State) (Postal/Zip Code)
_______________________ ______________
(Province – if applicable) (Country – if not US)
Rev. 11/16/2005
2 of 3
United States
Lawrence
Suite 234
449 Santa Fe Drive
Encinitas 92024
12/15/2003
United States
7-90-301
CA
Twombly
4
(The document need not state the true name and address of more than one individual. However, if you wish to state the name and address
of any additional individuals causing the document to be delivered for filing, mark this box and include an attachment stating the
name and address of such individuals.)
Disclaimer:
This form, and any related instructions, are not intended to provide legal, business or tax advice, and are
offered as a public service without representation or warranty. While this form is believed to satisfy minimum
legal requirements as of its revision date, compliance with applicable law, as the same may be amended from
time to time, remains the responsibility of the user of this form. Questions should be addressed to the user’s
attorney.
Rev. 11/16/2005
3 of 3
Post Unavailable
Your information was incorrect. The Company was not "Disolved". The paperwork was late so the company was in default. It was later reenstated as a Corporation in Good Standing. Do you realy think the Transfer agent and the SEC would allow trading for a company that has been "Desolved".
i didn't say that.
Post Unavailable
Probably will be for the rest of your life and nothing will ever get done... Keep dreaming Sargent Safety.
Yep, been a bagholder since then.
Oh I by no means am trying to keep Larry Twombly out. They're all in on it from what I can see. Miro and his crew are all over imo
Post Unavailable
Post Unavailable
Post Unavailable
Post Unavailable
While Roger Paszarnant's 2008 SEC letter posted at Silicon Investor is well worn as to alleged false and misleading statements issued by Hat Trick Beverage, has there been any attention paid to the fact that Hat Trick Beverage transacted business and issued new shares of HKBV (dilution) after the corporation was officially dissolved by state of Colorado on 31 May 2005? Thus far, I have not seen any such discussion of that particular and would be eager to learn of same.
A dissolved corporation is de jure a dead entity and cannot legally transact ordinary business much less issue new shares. Issuance of new shares by a dead public business entity is a fraud on the markets. Principals collecting proceeds from illegal issuances of new shares constitutes multiple felonies.
The last share-structure update was posted at Pink Sheets LLC website:
HKBV
Outstanding Shares 1,437,755,569 as of Oct 16, 2008
Authorized Shares 2,000,000,000 as of Apr 28, 2008
Number of Share Holders of Record 1,413 as of Oct 16, 2008
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/HKBV/company-info
Post Unavailable
I'm well aware of whats happened here, trust me.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT
Roger Paszarnant
Branch Chief
Direct Dial: (202) 5514979
Facsimile: (202) 772-9230
VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
COPY VIA TELECOPIER 866-455-6270
Dear Mr. Winters:
I respond to your faxed letter dated September 30, 2008. I will not comment about your characterizations of our communications that tend to minimize the seriousness of this situation, but will focus on facts.
The staff is concerned that Hat Trick may have disseminated materially false information to the public. We seek to resolve this issue immediately to help ensure that innocent investors are not being harmed by reliance on false and misleading information.
More specifically, Hat Trick issued at least three public statements regarding a contract with two Arizona supermarket chains_ First, on September 3, 2008, Hat Trick issued a public statement titled "Hat Trick Beverages (HKBV) in over 500 new retail locations" which included the following statements:
a. ts cold beverage division has picked up a major and a significant new distribution in the State of Arizona."
b. "The Company, working with its Arizona distributor, Pinnacle Distributing, has just achieved listings in a total of over 500 new store locations."
c. The Company's Pumped Fitness beverage . _ will now be available in Hi Health Stores, an upscale grocery chain, as well as Fry's, an important mid-market grocery chain."
d. "Hat Trick Beverage CEO, Sender Vaiser commented; 'This is a significant win.
These are strong, mid-sized retailers and they are demonstrating faith in the product concept.
e. "The issuer expects, and projects its initial order of 20,000 cases to begin filling
the retail pipeline with product, in September with up to 250,000 cases of anticipated fulfillment"
f. "The entire contract has a face value of $3,900,000.00 to the issuer.-
Second, on September 23, 2008, Hat Trick issued a public statement titled "Hat Trick Beverages (HKBV) Completes Initial Orders With 52 Hi Health Stores" which included the following statement:
"Hat Trick Beverages Inc. (1-11CBV.PK) is pleased to announce that it has received initial orders from Hi Health a 52 store chains (sic]."
Third, on or about September 26, 2008, Hat Trick issued a public statement dated September 25, 2008 and titled "Hat Trick Beverages (HKBV) Confirmation Of Previous News Release Transaction With Hi Health" which included the following statements:
a. "The issuer is using this filing to denounce such rumors, and affirm the validity of the agreement."
b. "The issuer hat (sic] Trick Beverages affirms and confirms to its shareholders that this contract in fact exists and is in a good and valid state."
c. "the buyer's name at Hi Health (which contract is the target of the false rumor) is Mike Gleela."
Since Monday, the staff, in communications with you and Larry Twombly, has repeatedly asked for documentation to verify the existence of a "contract" or "agreement" between Hat Trick and Hi Health. The only information you have provided to date is what appears to be a Hat Trick product order form dated September 25, 2008 billed to Pinnacle Distributing. This document was publicly disclosed by Hat Trick on September 29 "as a true copy of the Hi Health initial purchase order." The only reference to Hi Health is a handwritten note which provides no indication of any contract or agreement regarding Hi Health. It appears to be an order for about 1,000 24-pack cases, not 20,000 cases as referenced in the September 3 announcement, Thus, the "purchase order" provides little support for Hat Trick's public statements.
You stated to Ms. Cain and me that, since last week, you have been trying to substantiate the existence of an agreement by Hi Health to sell Hat Trick products. You thus admit that this is an issue you have been investigating since prior to our contacting you on Monday. The inability of a Hat Trick officer and director to obtain substantiating information in this time frame exacerbates our concern about the information Hat Tick has provided to the public.
Moreover, the staff has contacted Hi-Health Supermart Corporation and Pinnacle Distributing and the information provided does not support the public statements made by Hat Trick. Knowledgeable representatives from both have stated that Hi Health has made no commitment to buy Hat Trick products. In addition, Larry Twombly stated to the staff that Hat Trick's announcements contained inaccuracies--most importantly that there was no direct agreement between Hat Trick and Hi Health.
Finally, repeated messages left for Sender Vaiser have gone unanswered. The staff has been provided with a variety of inconsistent reasons about why he has been unable to contact us, including two from you -- first, that he was busy trying to get information about the Hi Health agreement and, second, that he has been at a trade show. Given the seriousness of the situation, I think it reasonable that the staff expect to hear promptly from the president of a public company who is quoted directly in some of the company's announcements at issue.
Again, evidence obtained by the staff to date indicates that Hat Trick public statements may be materially false. We request that Hat Trick substantiate the claims made it its public statements regarding Hi Health and Fry's by Monday, October 6, 2008. If Hat Trick cannot establish the existence of a valid contract or agreement by Hi Health and Fry's to carry Hat Tick's products, the staff may have no choice but to conclude that the statements are false and will proceed accordingly.
Sincerely,
Roger Paszarnant
"Fake," as you say, is the operative word pertaining to this defunct firm and its management, or what's left of it after they fleeced the markets and turned tail out of Dodge. Thousands of shareholders, conned by fakery and hype (politely put), lost thousands of dollars, respectively. That adds up to millions in biting losses for investors but enormous gains ill-gotten for insiders. For shame. Were it a just world, they'd likely be sitting now in small barred rooms. In any case, there's no reason to believe anything said by anyone connected to this company.
Re: "...the hype-campaign by trying to buy/sell this fake coffee machine business."
Post Unavailable
Well ninja
This may start to get interesting around her again. JMO
There are reasons this domain would have been attractive due to its uniqueness
http://www.tools4domains.com/dropping_domains/06_15_10/hattrickbeverages.html
It appears Value-Domain.Com, a Japanese web hosting company, is the assigned registrant of domain hattrickbeverages.com. The actual domain owner is thus not known. This would be analogous to, say, GoDaddy.Com being asssigned as registrant of a particular website in order to protect anonymity of actual website owner.
Japanese web hosting company:
http://www.value-domain.com/
English translation of above website:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.value-domain.com/&ei=meBtTKCtI5_1nAfNqoG3Dg&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCkQ7gEwAA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dvalue-domain.com/%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG%26complete%3D0
In hattrickbeverages.com website, the contact and e-mail links appear to be unusable. Otherwise, one could attempt contact with the Japanese site owner.
Anything is possible, however, my guess is the website owner hasn't the foggiest idea there was once a beverage company called Hat Trick Beverages with ticker symbol HKBV. After all, his exclusively Japanese site appears to be configured around IT; nothing about beverages from what I can see. Thus, the Japanese owner may have merely liked the look or sound of the available Hat Trick domain name--presuming, of course, that he could pronounce it.
Yea, I've had my shares available for the low price of .0001 for over a year. Perhaps I should check my sanity? LOL
Any chance this "telewave" will also adopt the HKBV shell? Snowball in hell?
Thanks. A $20 trade (100K) on 05August2010. My guess is a stray short squaring the books or some poor stuckholder attempting in vain desperation to engineer a pulse. After all, who would pay a $10 commission for just $20 of stock? Grey Sheeters can trade in the same way that anything at all, such as rotted fruit, can trade provided a buyer can find a seller, or vice versa. Trading the greys requires at minimum a telephone call to the broker and persistence if not a sanity check. lol
Good work tracking down the new Japanese owner of the domain name hattrickbeverages.com. The new owner's website is written in Japanese. Machine translation of that one-page ad hoc site yields a semi-coherent English version that demonstrates no apparent relationship whatever to Hat Trick Beverages of old. An IT site is my take-away. That the old website has been defaulted upon and relinquished by the previous owner arguably provides yet more evidence that Hat Trick Beverages (HKBV) is a dead horse.
I know all that, which is why it seemed odd that I saw trades up to .0002. Both Ihub and Etrade showed volume and price those days. Can a grey sheet trade? They're not supposed to are they?
money5607: From what source is your quote? Pink Sheets LLC delisted the stock and no longer quotes it. The stock is consigned to the Grey Sheets. See iBox.
Followers
|
54
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
7423
|
Created
|
05/09/05
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |