Global Warming Solutions Inc (GWSO)

[FomoBaghold]

Another 2,655,885 shares have just been cancelled

[trader59]

This company has nothing. They claimed to have a battery completely out of the blue with no cash and nothing spent on R & D to make one. It's just another OTC scam.

[UndervaluedFortunes]

Sodium-ion batteries are just scams now?

[trader59]

Just a twitter pump as the old bagholders toss their shares to the new bagholders, another OTC scam.

[Brian28]

Yes trump is talking about it! Dc.swamp on Instagram!!

[FomoBaghold]

Any reason for the latest jump in value?

[thetinman]

Lmao judging gwso off its office!!

Whaler,
What happened to cryo? Do they have a nice office too? Lmao..

[Chartmaster]

Should be bad enough for price to fall to the rising 50 day MA where i am a buyer in hopes of a great new CEO! No position yet

[FomoBaghold]

Is that a good thing or a bad thing?

[Chartmaster]

8K out, CEO Resigned!
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=14865379&guid=G68pUH1fVo6l93h

[Whaler350]

Time will tell!

[trader59]

Dark, defunct, stop sign once again, bogus operations, share selling scam.

[Whaler350]

Just got a look at the corporate HQ. Looks Great. Really nice space! So for all those that were saying there is no HQ??

[Jami2020]

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/global-warming-solutions-inc-opening-081500961.html

[ejobkar]

Holding this one LONG... EV + Battery Tech + SPAC

The industry/sector writing is on the wall! Follow the uptrend.

[Whaler350]

25k on the Bid

[Whaler350]

Watch GWSO it’s going to start moving boys

[Rudy Gobert]

Took a huge position here today based on friend and game changing ST who told me this was a great play.

Lets see

[Almost A Myth]

You have not produced any evidence that your analysis is supported by anyone other than yourself.

Sorry, but I cannot rely on an outlandish theory that is only supported by one person.

[trader59]

Oh, please... this company is irrelevant. The "hoards of angry shareholders" will come after they figure out they've been duped by a scam.

Can anybody produce ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION from any company that went from absolutely nothing to a patent on a new battery technology for EV's and did it on $16K?

Nope, because that's completely absurd, a fairy tale used to sell stock.

[Almost A Myth]

No, that is what you are basing your speculation on.

Is there any other published opinion in the world that concurs with yours?

Surely if these accusations you present are valid, there must be hoards of angry shareholders, outraged physicists and scientists, and a growing movement on social media to expose the fraud.

Please present ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION that shows at least 1 other person agrees with your analysis.

The company's own financial disclosures is all the proof needed.

[trader59]

The company's own financial disclosures is all the proof needed.

Here’s their end of September quarterly report, issued on November 25 with a “Subsequent Events” section for anything material that occurred up to the report date:

https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/264945/content

There is NOTHING mentioned about battery research, NOTHING mentioned about EV’s, NOTHING about a subsidiary called Alternata motors. ZILCH.

What there is mention of is 2.9M shares issued for a penny a share. A loan of $29k gets them nearly $5M.

Here’s their financial report ending September:

https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/264414/content

It shows $16.7k in cash. So, somehow, this company has had a miracle occur, going from zero to battery research and zero to EV company on 16 thousand dollars in a month. There is no universe in which that happens, it is complete BS made up to sell that stock.

[Almost A Myth]

Also interested to see this proof. All I've seen so far to support the scam theory is public documents presented in such a way as to promote a personal opinion.

[ejobkar]

Any proof or documentation conversions are being sold off? Pushing the "SCAM" agenda can only work if you have proof. I'm sure you'll do the right thing.

[trader59]

A patent on what? As of November, the company had no battery research going on whatsoever and no cash to do any if they wanted to. There's no indication whatsoever this is a real company. It's a scam to sell off those shares from the conversions.

[Nateng]

Let's wait for the company to file a patent first it is a few weeks away. Then, they can release more information on the method they use. If you look at their scientist, he had a patent in 2006 and a prototype was done on hydrogen...he was ahead of his time. I trust that their research team will show real progress and I agree, will take time. But, so far, I do not see signs that this is not real company.

[FROZENFLAME]

Sure we will be flying next week .

[FROZENFLAME]

$GWSO a sleeping giant, ready to wake up and run .

[FROZENFLAME]

Very thin .

[FROZENFLAME]

$GWSO this is the future of making a good company .

[FROZENFLAME]

GWSO press releases https://www.gwsogroup.com/category/press-releases/

[FROZENFLAME]

Agree, $GWSO

[trader59]

No, the SEC doesn't get involved "quick" and likely won't at all, even when the stock sale is over and the bagholders are left in the wake of the dump wondering why they haven't heard from the company. The SEC isn't actively policing the OTC, if they were it would be shut down completely.

No matter how many times an attempt is made to slap "opinion" on the cold, hard, common sense that it takes way more money than $16k and way more time than a couple months to even launch research on an EV battery, much less produce one, it remains absurd to even suggest this company's claims can be even remotely legitimate.

[Almost A Myth]

Thank you for compiling that information and giving us your opinion of what it all means.

I'll welcome ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION that supports your claims, but apparently none exists. Surely if the scam is so huge, there must be dozens or hundreds of people speaking out in support of your fraud theory and trying to raise awareness. Where are the physicists and scientists, the industry experts, the whistle blowers, the litigation hungry lawyers, and the defrauded shareholders rallying to expose the deception? Please post the corroborating documentation from all of the other sources who support your opinions.

If a company makes an outright false claim and illegally inflates the stock price to multiple dollars, the SEC takes notice and gets involved quick. Just because they pay less attention to the trips and subs stocks being manipulated does not mean they turn a blind eye on the entire market.

GWSO is one of the biggest stories on the entire OTC right now. There is no way the SEC would let them continue to trade if it was a fraud.

[trader59]

And, once again, the development of a successful EV battery takes way longer than 2 months and a ton more money than $16K, and it is preposterous to even suggest that because a pump and dump's PPS went up and the SEC hasn't shut down a non-reporting stinky pink company that it is somehow legit.

The SEC doesn't patrol the OTC, they couldn't possibly come close to doing that. That's why these scams live on and the pump and dumps happen. The claims on this one are nothing short of laughable.

The documents are there, all submitted by the company, financial reports showing the condition of the business and the things they were claiming to do. All that need be done is applying an ounce of common sense.

[The GidDy uP Kid]

GidDy uP GWSO...

[Almost A Myth]

Where is your proof that the company's PR's are pump and dumps? You are stating your own personal opinion, which is fine, but there is no supporting documentation to quantify that opinion.

Find me some supporting documentation that upholds your claims. Otherwise I will continue to agree with the stock market, the EV power market, the physics community, the CEO, and the SEC that the information presented by GWSO is accurate.

Got any proof of that besides the company's own pump and dump PR's?

[trader59]

Everybody that has spent any time on the OTC at all knows that the SEC hardly polices it at all and that 99% of the companies are complete scams. Despite the ridiculous efforts to "turn the tables" here into "you have to prove the company's claims are false," a company that had no cash and nothing by way of even research into batteries ongoing as of a couple of months ago has to prove it went from 0 to brand new battery in less than 2 months with $16k cash. Got any proof of that besides the company's own pump and dump PR's? Nope

[Almost A Myth]

Thank you for posting your opinions and personal interpretation of this company.

If you would post some corroborating documentation other than your own analysis of company information and undertakings, I would be more inclined to look into the claims. There is no technical data, no third party verification, and no other personal opinions that I can find to support your claims.

I personally cannot uphold the notion that the company, CEO and a couple of sneaky note holders perpetrated such a colossal fraud, and continue with this felonious undertaking, as they intentionally fool the market into buying worthless shares using fake news about false technology....all without attracting the attention of the SEC. I need something more than an opinion of one person to take such claims seriously.

The people you are accusing would be in handcuffs already if what you claim is true.

[trader59]

Oh, please...

I have the company's own documentation of their business and financial condition.

Here's end of September, submitted on 11/25:

https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/264945/content

Note that, of the 6 BS projects they mention, none of them have a single thing to do with batteries, EV's, or anything of the sort. No mention of that "subsidiary" in the BS PR, either. Do note the convertible notes that turned $29k of debt into 2.9M shares of stock worth... what, today? Page 3 for that.

Here's their financial condition:

https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/264414/content

$16k in cash. That's it. Takes megamillions to move battery tech research forward, yet, somehow, this company made it happen on $16K.

Sorry, that's absurd. This is about selling stock.

[Almost A Myth]

All I am seeing you provide is your own personal opinions.

What qualifies you to claim that these technology achievements are an impossibility? Have you had an extensive physics background, or been exposed to numerous alternative battery technologies? Have you ever worked in the EV power industry?

Do you hold any documentation that would make your opinions hold more weight than a layperson outside of the industry?

[trader59]

The company has made a claim that is unsupported by the facts of their own financial condition and business documented in their financial reports. That table cannot be turned around to "prove the claims of a brandy new battery developed with no capital and within 2 months isn't true." That is truly absurd.

[Almost A Myth]

You are still saying the same thing and providing none of the documentation needed to back up your claims.

What other information do you have, other than your personal opinion, that supports your claim(s) that the technology and company is "hogwash"?

IMO absurd is when a claim is made with no supporting documentation. I have listened to your claims, now please provide the documentation.

Please answer the questions:

I would like to see actual 3rd party documentation that proves the technology is false. Can you provide anything like that?

Can you document any instances of investors filing complaints with the SEC regarding false GWSO technology?

[trader59]

And I would like to see 3rd party documentation that proves that a company can go from absolutely nothing, no research whatsoever, to having a ground breaking EV battery in less than 2 months. The existence of the technology has to be proven, that's the claim that has been made. It takes years and a mountain of cash to even do the research for failure, this company hasn't done it in 2 months with an empty bank account.

That's absurd to even consider.

[Almost A Myth]

Again, can you provide current documentation that proves the technology is false?

Referencing the company's past research, quarterly reports, and share exchanges does not provide any information relevant to my question. I have been reading your posts and I am aware of your observations and claims. Is there any concrete evidence, aside from the company information you've presented, to corroborate your claims?

I would like to see actual 3rd party documentation that proves the technology is false. Can you provide anything like that?

Can you document any instances of investors filing complaints with the SEC regarding false GWSO technology?

[trader59]

Once again, this company had zero battery research going on and zero cash to do any with as of the report date of their last quarterly report, middle of November. Nothing going on whatsoever, and you don't go from zero to brand new battery in 2 months, period.

[Almost A Myth]

When a penny stock moves to $3+, you can bet the SEC takes notice.

If the technology was false, there would be countless stories outlining how and why it was false, plus there would be hoards of investors filing complaints with the SEC.

Can you provide documentation that the technology is false, or is it speculation based on the perceived share selling scheme?

[FROZENFLAME]

$GWSO adding .

[trader59]

The SEC polices very few OTC pump and dumps, especially those that are non-reporting, comparing their claims to reality. Everybody knows that, it's the only way the OTC even survives.

[Almost A Myth]

If this technology was false, the SEC would have shut this ticker down long ago.

The SEC will check out stories like this and if they find inconsistencies, they suspend the ticker.

Companies get suspended all the time for making false claims and releasing false information to the public.

There is no way the SEC would let GWSO trade all the way over $3 and continue to trade in the $2 area if the technology was false.