Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Re-post - (APPH, LOCL) - >>> High-tech farming startups have been crushed:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/high-tech-farm-startups-are-laid-low-by-financing-drought-pests-1bf6a60a
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171989758
Startups that promised to make farming a high-tech business are withering, suffering from rising costs, tight financing, pests and other problems that have troubled traditional agriculture for centuries.
Investors poured billions of dollars into companies such as AppHarvest and Local Bounti that grow lettuce, tomatoes and other crops in indoor farms that use advanced technology such as sensors and robots to offset weather-related risks, use less water and produce more consistent crops. Shares of the two companies are down more than 95% since they went public in 2021, and in recent months at least four companies in the sector have shut down or filed for bankruptcy...
<<<
---
>>> Steakholder Foods® Unveils 3D Bio-printing Business Model
Steakholder Foods Ltd.
May 25, 2023
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/steakholder-foods-unveils-3d-bio-printing-business-model-301834537.html
The business model will focus on selling 3D bio-printers and bio-inks designed to develop delicious, nutritious, safe, and consistent cultivated meat from ethically harvested cells.
3D bio-printers: the Company is developing Ready-to-Cook 3D printers, for the production of hybrid cultivated products, incorporating a unique printing process that gives the product its fibrous texture.
Bio-inks: the Company is developing various bio-inks to print different species, and will offer customization options intended to allow clients to purchase bio-inks for any type of species they would like to produce, tailored to their specific needs and preferences.
REHOVOT, Israel, May 25, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- Steakholder Foods Ltd. (Nasdaq: STKH), an international deep-tech food company at the forefront of the cultivated meat industry, today announced that it has focused its business model to target B2B meat manufacturers and cultivated meat producers, by offering manufacturers the ability to produce a cultivated meat product that aims to closely mimic the taste, texture, and appearance of traditional meat. The Company intends to monetize its 3D printers and bio-inks that are needed to support printer operation.
The Company's competitive advantage lies in its top-of-the-line expertise in 3D bio-printing technology and its ability to create highly–sophisticated, structured end products that aim to closely mimic real meat in terms of taste, texture, and appearance.
In accordance with Steakholder Foods' new business model, the products it plans to offer:
1. 3D bio-printers
The Company's 3D printers are state-of-the-art technology designed to produce cultivated meat products that mimic the texture, taste, and appearance of conventional meat. The Company is developing two types of printer platforms:
Ready to Cook (RTC) printer
The flagship product, the RTC printer, produces a hybrid cultivated meat product made from a mixture of cultivated and plant-based ingredients.
The Company plans to offer lab- and industrial-scale printers using one of two types of technology to produce different end products. DropJet technology, based on drops of gel-based materials to create a 3D structure, is ideal for producing fish and seafood products, while for all other meat products, Fusion technology extrudes paste materials through a narrow nozzle, enabling the creation of fiber texture that best simulates conventional meat fibers.
3D printer for incubated products
The Company's innovation team is developing a 3D printer for an incubated product, such as tissue-engineered steak, considered the holy grail of the industry. This printer is expected to be a future value proposition for the Company when economies of scale support a market for fully cultivated products. This printer is designed to produce a fully matured, cultivated, printed meat product, which will require live cells to grow, differentiate, and mature, forming complex fibrous tissue that resembles the texture and taste of conventional meat.
2. Bio-inks
Bio-inks are an integral part of the Company's 3D printing technology. Steakholder Foods' bio-inks are made of plant-based ingredients and cultivated cells. They are developed to ensure the production of tasty, safe, and consistent products. The Company plans to offer customization options intended to allow clients to create bio-inks for any type of species they would like to produce, tailored to their specific needs and preferences. The bio-inks will be available for purchase alongside the 3D printers.
Arik Kaufman, CEO of Steakholder Foods: "By offering 3D printing production methodologies to B2B clients, Steakholder Foods has the opportunity to become a backbone supplier that enables the production of products that consumers seek and expect. Our 3D bio-printing technology and customized bio-inks reflect our commitment to revolutionizing the food industry."
About Steakholder Foods
Steakholder Foods Ltd., formerly MeaTech 3D Ltd., is an international deep-tech food company at the forefront of the cultured meat revolution. The company-initiated activities in 2019 and is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the ticker "STKH" (formerly MITC), with headquarters in Rehovot, Israel.
The company is developing a slaughter-free solution for producing cellular agriculture meat products, such as beef and seafood, by offering manufacturers the ability to produce a cultivated meat product that aims to closely mimic the taste, texture, and appearance of traditional meat— as an alternative to industrialized farming and fishing. With its membership in the UN Global Compact, Steakholder Foods is committed to act in support of issues embodied in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which include strengthening food security, decreasing carbon footprint, and conserving water and land resources.
<<<
---
I already feel the relief. Like walking out of my first AA meeting. I knew my drinking days were over. 41 years later, still sober
I guess it will be a relief to finally get some 'closure' to the RIBT saga. Following a stock closely for years, an emotional attachment develops, and there can be a sense of loss once the company is history. I once followed some bio stocks very closely for years, but in biotech the stocks often live on virtually forever as sub-penny 'shells'. Hopefully RIBT will end in a buyout or merger so the 'saga' has a clear resolution :o)
---
I think they were waiting for the official Q1 before making the final deal. Next week is my guess
.
With the RIBT conf call, it was very short and no Q+A? Sounds like they might be in the 'quiet period' of a deal for the company, merger, etc. Just a guess though. Should be interesting to see what happens.
---
I think we will see a divestiture next week. They are bringing in a man and his company that specializes in the rules, regulations, forms to fill out, etc. I think it is a done deal, the price? I have no idea. I have my hopes and fears. Nobody outside the company knows how good or bad Q1 was.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ricebran-technologies-names-william-j-200600370.htm
He only will make $4500 per month. If he as to be making a deal himself from scratch, he'd demand more, so deal is done, IMO.
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1063537/000143774923009991/ribt20230410_8k.htm
I'd like $3.00 per share, but doubt that happens. With the stock rising, I guess $1.50 the lowest. But, I have never ever seen a divesture , when parts are sold to various parties. If just a normal sale, I doubt they'd bring in CXO Partners. Maybe Monday we get the story, that is when Keneally takes over the the CFO resigns.
Nice to see RIBT back to 1.00, and the chart is starting to look promising again. Sounds like a potential sale of the company might be in the cards (?), or at least some type of restructuring, based on the recent comments from management.
Your idea of another company using RIBT's listing to go public sounds interesting, although I'm not too familiar with how that overall process would work. The alternate 'SPAC' route has been out of favor lately, but might have a resurgence if the overall market conditions continue to improve.
With the food and agro sectors I have mainly stayed with the larger cap names, so nothing too exciting. I figure these provide some stability to the portfolio, and should be fairly 'recession-proof' -
Coca Cola (KO)
Diageo (DEO)
Flowers Foods (FLO)
Hershey (HSY)
Kroger (KR)
Mondelez Intl (MDLZ)
Nestle (NSRGY)
Pepsico (PEP)
---
Italy’s ban on cultivated meat could set the industry back
https://techcrunch.com/2023/03/28/italy-ban-cultivated-meat/
Just when the U.S. government was getting more comfortable with the concept of cultivated meat, the Italian government put forth a bill banning the use of lab-grown food.
The process of making cultivated meat includes a method, like precision fermentation in a laboratory, that uses animal cells without slaughtering the animals.
Reuters reported that the bill “aims to safeguard the country’s agri-food heritage,” according to the country’s agriculture minister, Francesco Lollobrigida, who also said, “Laboratory products in our opinion do not guarantee quality, well-being and the protection of our culture, our tradition.”
The bill will now go in front of parliament, and if passed, any violation of the law in the future could result in fines of up to €60,000, or about $65,000.
In a response to the proposed ban, Cellular Agriculture Europe called it “bad public policy,” and that it would “reduce consumers’ ability to choose the food they want,” especially new products for those “who are concerned about animal welfare and the environmental impact of their food.”
Currently, Singapore is the only country allowing sales of cultivated chicken. Good Meat was the first company to get approval to sell its cultivated chicken product there and received a U.S. Food and Drug Administration clearance last week, joining Upside Foods, as the only two companies to move to the next stage of commercializing their products in the U.S.
Dozens of companies, both in the U.S. and elsewhere, are not far behind in getting cultivated, or cell-cultured, meat products on the market. In the U.S., these companies have to receive approval from both the FDA and U.S. Department of Agriculture before commercializing their products in this country.
>>> Cultured meat firm resurrects woolly mammoth in lab-grown meatball
Tech Crunch
by Paul Sawers
3-28-23
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/cultured-meat-firm-resurrects-woolly-mammoth-in-lab-grown-meatball/ar-AA19aVqD?OCID=ansmsnnews11
Truth, as the saying goes, is often stranger than fiction. The very notion of resurrecting the long-extinct woolly mammoth was the stuff of fantasy not that long ago, but scientists are already working on ways to achieve something close to that, using DNA from soft-tissue in frozen mammoth remains and meshing it with that of a modern-day elephant.
But while such “de-extinction” projects may or may not ultimately succeed, one company is already laying claim to having produced the first meat product made from mammoth DNA.
Vow, an Australian cultivated food company that creates meat in a laboratory setting from animal cells, says that it has used advanced molecular engineering to resurrect the woolly mammoth in meatball form, by combining original mammoth DNA with fragments of an African elephant’s DNA.
There’s little question that cultivated meat is coming, evidenced by the countless companies raising vast swathes of venture capital funding to produce meat and fish in a lab from animal cells, as well as the fact that companies are now starting to receiving the blessings of regulators such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). But while pork sausages and seafood make sense insofar as they are food that people are familiar with, Vow — which closed a $49.2 million round of funding just a few months ago — is clearly upping the ante with its foray into the world of extinct animals.
It’s worth acknowledging that there is a sizeable element of marketing magicianship to this announcement. The very concept was devised by communications agency and WPP-subsidiary Wunderman Thompson, which tells us something about the intent here — this is very much a promotional campaign for Vow. But at the same time, it’s also a promotional campaign for cultured meat in general, and the role it could play in creating a sustainable protein source that doesn’t involve killing animals. By some estimations, around 60% of greenhouse gas emissions from food production emanate from animal-based foods, double that of plant-based equivalents.
“The goal behind creating the mammoth meatball was really about starting that discussion around food, and what that decision to eat meat really means to the world at large, by bringing an extinct protein back to life,” James Ryall, Vow’s chief science officer, said in a video promoting the mammoth meatball.
Ryall said that the company first identified the mammoth myoglobin, a protein that is key to giving meat its color and taste, and then used publicly available data to identify the DNA sequence in mammoths.
“We filled in any gaps in the DNA sequence of this mammoth myoglobin gene, by using the genome of the African elephant, the mammoth’s closest living relative,” Ryall said. “We inserted the mammoth myoglobin gene into our cells using a very low-current and high-voltage charge. Then we continued to grow and multiply these cells just as would occur in a mammoth thousands of years ago. And the amazing thing about this is that not a single animal needed to die to produce the mammoth meatball.”
This isn’t the first time scientists have created food products from extinct animals. Back in 2018, a VC-backed Silicon Valley startup called Geltor made gummies using protein from a mastodon, another distant relative of elephants. However, in this latest instance, it’s believed that nobody has actually tasted one of the mammoth meatballs. Speaking to the Guardian newspaper, Professor Ernst Wolvetang, from the Australian Institute for Bioengineering at the University of Queensland which worked with Vow in this project, suggested that it’s probably not safe to try the meatball just now.
“We haven’t seen this protein for thousands of years,” Wolvetang said. “So we have no idea how our immune system would react when we eat it. But if we did it again, we could certainly do it in a way that would make it more palatable to regulatory bodies.”
The mammoth meatball is set to be officially unveiled at Nemo Science Museum in the Netherlands today.
Cultured meat firm resurrects woolly mammoth in lab-grown meatball by Paul Sawers originally published on TechCrunch
<<<
---
>>> Lab-grown chicken clears FDA safety hurdle
CBS News
by Aliza Chasan
March 21, 2023
https://news.yahoo.com/lab-grown-chicken-clears-fda-020946735.html
Lab-grown chicken has taken a step closer to hitting American grocery stores.
The Food and Drug Administration on Monday cleared cultured "cultured chicken cell material" made by GOOD Meat as safe for use as human food. While the FDA said the lab-grown chicken was safe to eat, GOOD Meat still needs approval from the Agriculture Department before it can sell the product in the U.S.
If approved, acclaimed chef José Andrés plans to serve GOOD Meat's chicken to customers at his Washington, D.C. restaurant. He's on GOOD Meat's board of directors.
"The future of our planet depends on how we feed ourselves," he said in a press release. "And we have a responsibility to look beyond the horizon for smarter, sustainable ways to eat."
The FDA previously gave the green light to lab-grown chicken made by Upside Foods in November.
Upside Foods and GOOD Meat both use cells from chickens to create the cultured chicken products.
Once cells are extracted, GOOD Meat picks the cells most likely to produce healthy, sustainable and tasty meat, the company explained. The cells are immersed in nutrients inside a tank. They grow and divide, creating the cultured chicken, which can be harvested after four to six weeks.
"It's real, delicious meat with an identical nutritional profile to conventionally raised meat but with less impact on our planet and less risk of contamination," GOOD Meat said on its website.
GOOD Meat's chicken is already sold in Singapore.
Global livestock accounts for nearly 15% of greenhouse gasses, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations found in 2013. Advocates for lab-grown meat say it can help cut back on methane emissions and combat climate change (LOL).
<<<.
---
Yes, it sounds like RIBT management could be looking at all 'strategic options', based on the CC comments. It might be to re-focus the company on the most promising and profitable areas, or to sell the company, etc. These would be 'material events' that have to be disclosed, but it sounds like it might still be in the review stages.
Sorry to see the stock tank so much. These tiny stocks are full of risks and surprises, so I guess it 'goes with the territory'. But hopefully it will get a bounce back to the 1.00 area.
>>> Despite the progress in parts of the company in 2022, notably in the rice and specialty milling businesses, the Core-SRB has not moved forward as we wanted it to and the value-added derivatives business continues to suffer major market and operational challenges. Accordingly, we were not able to achieve the goal of positive adjusted EBITDA.
The Board is in the midst of a strategic review of all the possibilities for RiceBran Technologies. These alternatives are at various stages of review. And given the sensitive nature of this process, I am currently unable to provide any further details.<<<
---
I am afraid RIBT will be sold. At their CC today, it was short and closed with like "We can't say anymore do to ongoing discussions". And those were probably waiting for the Q4 to become official. They had a 32% revenue increase, but their yeast replacement made for rice bran fell through.
Book value at the end of Q3 was $2.50. I can guess now below $2. I have no idea how much above book value a buyout can go for. With revenues increasing, well, that might help.
https://greenstocknews.com/news/nasdaq/ribt/ricebran-technologies-reports-fourth-quarter-2022-results
gfp, I was glad to see the bounce too. I hope someone knows something. It started out weak, but 21,000 worth of buys sent it up after about an hour. Still some selling going on, but buy volume is 97K over sell 37K. Yesterday with fall, buy volume was just a bit less than buy volume. On Fridays big fall, buy was lower than sell volume.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/NASDAQ/ricebran-technologies-RIBT/trades?_ga=2.256236424.2012683222.1554897425-334505475.1554897425
I am happy to see closing above the 50 and 100 day MA's
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=RIBT&p=D&yr=0&mn=7&dy=0&id=p55203955733
Else holding over 1/2 of the recent gain. And it is staying above the 200
MA. Looks bullish yet to me.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=BABYF&p=D&yr=0&mn=7&dy=0&id=p63886487057
Nice bounce for RIBT today, and higher volume. Looks like anticipation is building for the upcoming earnings report and CC on Thursday, and the bounce in the overall market also helps. RIBT put in a bullish 'hammer' candlestick yesterday, and then today's bounce, so a good sign :o)
---
I have not been watching Else, nice move and nice PR>>>
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/else-nutrition-increases-production-capacity-120000049.html
RIBT? Well, they were working on a replacent for yeast in pet food, guessing with Purina, that is owned by Nestle. Somehow the ingredients in rice bran were turned into a liquid and the filter(screen or whatever) had coagulation and a new part was being developed. They had expansion in 3 places getting ready for the new product. That is the last we heard at the last CC in Noivember CC. Maybe next week and we might hear something. Shareholders I know are getting NOTHING out the the IR or others, extreme quite. So, it could be bad or good.
With the SEC investingating FinTwit over pump and dump of other stocks, I can guess management wants total quiet. iI Fintwit is sued over RIBT, RIBT would be the victim. But still it is best management be quiet. If the new yeast replacement is working out, Q4 results if good could lead to a partership or a big deal or such. The history of the stock has not been good.
Yes, the stock chart looks "intersting". I see the bid raised quite often in the afternoon on down days and selling into the raised bid gets the stock even or up, like today.. Last years Q4 CC was March 17th, I am guessing a PR comes out later this week or early nest week announcing the CC date and time.
The RIBT chart looks like it might be getting ready for some additional upside. Just a guess, but it's starting to have 'that look' again, and news flow should be forthcoming, so GL :o)
Btw, I see that BABYF is finally having a nice rebound, although the press release hype will need to be backed up by growth in sales in the quarters ahead -
>>> Else Nutrition Increases Production Capacity to Satisfy the Increasing Strong Demand
Else Nutrition Holdings Inc.
March 2, 2023
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/else-nutrition-increases-production-capacity-120000049.html
Else adds a second US powder production facility and begins manufacturing in Europe, tripling its production capacity.
Else increases production pace to end out-of-stock and build up inventory levels.
VANCOUVER, British Columbia, March 02, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ELSE NUTRITION HOLDINGS INC. (BABY) (BABYF) (0YL.F) ("Else" or the "Company"), announces that it has begun manufacturing in a second powder production facility in the US and that it will perform the first commercial production in Europe in March 2023. The additional production facilities more than triple Else’s production capacity.
Until the end of 2022 Else Nutrition had a single powder manufacturing plant that supported its sales in North America and globally. The addition of the two new production facilities will allow Else to satisfy the fast-growing retail demand from brick-and-mortar retailers and online sales from Amazon and Else’s e-store. The additional production will reduce the risk of future out-of-stock dramatically.
In January and February Else performed two commercial production campaigns in the US, resolving many out-of-stock issues. In March Else will perform three additional production campaigns, two in the US and one in Europe, resolving all remaining out-of-stock issues. Else plans to continue its accelerated manufacturing plan throughout 2023 to support the growing demand and to establish a higher level of available inventory.
“The additional production facilities will allow us to stabilize our production and build up sufficient inventory levels to meet the robust demand from our customers.” - Hamutal Yitzhak, Else's CEO, and Co-Founder. “We are excited to have entered a new phase in our journey, where leading grocery and mass North American retailers are now adding our products to their shelves, our ability to properly support this fast-growing demand is critical for our success.”
For more information, visit: www.elsenutrition.com or follow Else Nutrition on LinkedIn
About Else Nutrition Holdings Inc.
Else Nutrition Holdings Inc. is a food and nutrition company in the international expansion stage focused on developing innovative, clean, and plant-based food and nutrition products for infants, toddlers, children, and adults. Its revolutionary, plant-based, non-soy formula is a clean-ingredient alternative to dairy-based formula. Else Nutrition (formerly INDI) won the "2017 Best Health and Diet Solutions" award at Milan's Global Food Innovation Summit. The parent company, Else Nutrition Holdings Inc., is a publicly traded company, listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the trading symbol BABY and is quoted on the US OTCQX Market under the trading symbol BABYF and the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol 0YL. Since launching its Plant-Based Complete Nutrition for Toddlers, made of whole foods, almonds, buckwheat, and tapioca, the brand has received thousands of powerful testimonials and reviews from parents, gained national retailer support, and achieved rapid sales growth. Else became the #1 Best Seller on Amazon in the Fall of 2020 in the New Baby & Toddler Formula Category. It won the 'Best Dairy Alternative' Award 2021 at World Plant-Based Expo and was a Nexty Award Finalist at Expo West 2022 in the Plant-Based lifestyle category. During September 2022 Else Super Cereal reached the #1 Best Seller in Baby Cereal across all brands on Amazon.
<<<
---
Looks like a lot of day traders got in and got out. Not as bad as RKDA, who the same group promoted early on. CC coming in 2 weeks or less, no new money raised lately, cash flow neutral could happen in Q4, but more likely in Q1, which they could give guidance at the CC in 2 weeks. Any bad news and back to .65 the stock goes.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=RKDA&p=D&yr=0&mn=7&dy=0&id=p46870482523
IT has 49,000 folowers, many paid who get a stock before he posts it.
Is $RKDA going to ignite other reverse splits. $SINT $RIBT $RELI showing signs ..
— IT (@IncredibleTrade) March 2, 2023
Big volume for RIBT today, almost 1/2 mil shares traded, and looks like a lot of the activity was in the morning from 11 - noon. Does RIBT release their earnings soon, and the 2022 full year results? A good sign that the stock is perking up ahead of earnings :o)
---
Lab meat makes me cringe. But hey, I am skeptical of over weight EV's run by coal and solar panels on homes saving money in the long run, but some day revisions , maybe. I feel there is a lot of BS on both sides of every issue in 2023, and here is a negative view of lab meat. Yet, I do believe the pills the Star Trek crew took as food could happen some day, lol, but not in my lifetime.
Don’t Be Fooled: Lab-Grown Meat Is a Disaster in the Making
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/lab-grown-meat-ultra-processed-product-farmers-ranchers/
Story at-a-glance:
Underneath the greenwashed façade, lab-grown meat has been hyped beyond reality and its promises are slated to fall flat.
In February, the Good Food Institute (GFI), a nonprofit group behind the alternative protein industry, released a techno-economic analysis of cultivated meat, which claims cultured meat could be economically feasible by 2030; this is disputed by several experts.
One expert estimated that the cost for 1 kilogram (kg) (35.27 ounces) of cell culture product for human consumption would cost in excess of $8,500 to $3,600 per kilogram.
Pharmaceutical-grade specifications and aseptic “clean rooms” would be necessary due to the slow growth rate of culture cells, which makes them extremely vulnerable to contamination from bacteria and viruses — GFI’s report assumes only “food-grade” specifications.
When lab-grown chicken made by U.S. startup Eat Just debuted in Singapore in 2020, it was produced using fetal bovine serum, largely canceling out one of the key tenets of the cultured meat rhetoric — that it’s made without animals.
GFI’s life-cycle analysis found that cultured meat may be worse for the environment than conventionally produced chicken and pork if conventional energy sources are used.
Fake meats are not about your health or the environment’s — they’re a tool to phase out farmers and ranchers and replace them with an ultraprocessed food product that can be controlled by patents.
>>> Why Is Vertical Farming Bad: 9 Disadvantages
Vertical Farming Planet
by Mateusz Piechowiak
https://verticalfarmingplanet.com/why-is-vertical-farming-bad-9-disadvantages/
With an estimated 9.7 billion people on earth by 2050, food security will become a real concern for many countries around the world. Vertical farming is often regarded as a solution to our food scarcity issues due to its many advantages which I described in this article. Although vertical farming is becoming more popular, there are some red flags. It has high upfront costs, requires large amounts of energy, and requires a highly trained workforce.
This article explores all the disadvantages of vertical farming while suggesting possible solutions, as well.
1. High initial costs
Vertical farming is a cost-intensive endeavor, as every step of the process from finding the right facilities to choosing the best-performing crops requires a substantial amount of money. Land prices alone greatly increase the initial upfront costs, as land in urban areas is usually very expensive. However, many vertical farms have been able to minimize facility-related costs by using existing structures, such as shipping containers, old factories, and abandoned office buildings. Alternatively, vertical farms could be built in barren land unsuited to conventional agriculture.
In many vertical farming startups, equipment costs put additional pressure on the budget. Most vertical farms need expensive equipment such as climate controls, shelving units, LED lights, water lines, computers, etc. Nevertheless, the cost of indoor agriculture equipment is expected to drop dramatically as indoor agriculture becomes more popular and the number of vertical farms increases.
2. High operational costs
Distribution of the main operational costs in a small-scale vertical farm (less than 10,000 square feet). * includes costs related to nutrients, growing mediums, and seeds. The data were sourced from a Pure Greens Arizona LLC article.
Energy
Vertical farming is undoubtedly an energy-intensive endeavor, but even more so if farms rely solely on artificial lighting systems. Approximately 40 to 50% of the total production costs come from energy consumption and lighting costs alone can account for 25-30% of the operational costs.
Labor
For all indoor farming operations, labor is usually the highest operational cost, as it is estimated that a small hydroponic farm spends on average 57% on labor. Vertical farming is also expected to experience a significant reduction in operating costs as technology advances and becomes more efficient.
Other
Operating costs for most vertical farms depend largely on the farming method employed, as each has its requirements. Geoponic, hydroponic, and aeroponic methods are currently among the most widely used in vertical farming. For example, geoponic systems are less costly in terms of maintenance, labor, and technical costs, whereas, hydroponic and aeroponic methods, on the other hand, require highly skilled workers to function effectively. Aside from this, the costs of seeds, nutrients, and growing mediums in these systems add to the final operating costs. Small hydroponic farms spend, on average, 6% of their total operating expenses on seeds, growth media, and nutrients, while large ones spend, on average, 13%, according to Pure Greens Arizona LLC.
3. A limited number of crops that can be grown economically
A vertical farm can be customized to support the growth of any plant species, however, only a limited number of them can be grown economically. In the global vertical farming industry, leafy greens and herbs remain the primary crop due to their rapid growth cycle, high cost, and short shelf life. Along with their relatively easy growing process, leafy greens have a high-profit margin that makes them very appealing to vertical farmers.
However, the popularity of vertical farming has led many to expand their cultivation repertoire by starting to grow more challenging crops like strawberries and tomatoes. For instance, the New Jersey-based vertical farm “Oishii” by reproducing the climate conditions of Japanese mountains indoors supplies New Yorkers with vertically grown strawberries of the rare Omakase variety.
In the near future, the use of cutting-edge technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) should enable vertical farming to produce cheaper crops with a long shelf life, like grains. With the present technology, this may not be economically feasible just yet.
4. Crops that are currently grown have a small caloric density
Calorie density measures how many calories a food contains in relation to its mass or volume. At present, crops grown in vertical farms have a very low caloric density. For example, 100g serving of lettuce and spinach contains just 15 and 23 calories, respectively. By contrast, the British National Health Service (NHS) recommends 2500 calories per day for men and 2000 for women. Thus, vertically produced food only accounts for a small proportion of daily calorie intake proving that in the current state of cultivation vertical farming cannot meet all the nutritional needs of an adult human.
5. Very high demand for energy
Natural light in vertical farming is replaced by artificial illumination provided by LED (Light Emitting Diode) lighting systems. Depending on the needs of the plant species, the lights can be on for 12- 16 hours and in some cases even up to 20 hours per day. Lighting is the most critical component of a vertical farm, and it consumes large amounts of energy. A German study analyzing the economics of vertical farming estimated a 37-floor vertical farm would consume 3.5GWh of energy annually. In addition to increasing production costs, this substantial energy consumption also increases the carbon footprint and carbon emissions.
Vertical farming can drastically reduce its carbon footprint by gradually shifting toward renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power. Various vertical farms are rapidly replacing traditional energy sources with renewables and some of them such as “Harvest London” are now entirely powered by renewable energy. As renewable energy becomes more prevalent in many countries, switching to it will be easier than ever. Furthermore, technological advances in the LED and HVAC systems will reduce both equipment and production costs as well as energy consumption.
6. Running a vertical farm requires sophisticated skills
Running a vertical farm is not an easy job as it requires advanced technological and horticultural skills that only a small percentage of people around the world possess. Due to the high tech involved in every stage of the production process, highly educated and trained individuals are needed to set up, run, and maintain a vertical farm.
For example, automation engineers and software engineers are required to install the climate stations, lighting system, and water recycling system. In addition, horticulturists and biologists are needed to select the best-performing crops and monitor each stage of plant growth, as well as maintenance engineers to ensure that every piece of equipment functions properly.
The availability of open-source materials online is helping to spread knowledge, enabling everyone interested to learn new skills. Furthermore, various vertical farming conferences are held annually, allowing people in the field to exchange their knowledge and experience with each other and newcomers. The introduction of vertical farming to the school system would also increase awareness in the younger generation and remove misconceptions and myths regarding the sector. The involvement of AI and ML in vertical farming will make this industry more attractive to younger generations, thereby revitalizing and boosting innovation in the aging farming industry.
7. The knowledge about indoor farming is still small
The concept of vertical farming was introduced in 1999 by Dr. Despommier and his graduate students and since its inception, vertical farming has rapidly become a global phenomenon. More countries are embracing vertical farming as a way to address global food security, driving an increase in the number of vertical farms around the world.
Even as vertical farming technology and production techniques continue to improve, a lack of knowledge still lingers in the industry. Highly trained professionals such as horticulturists and agriculture engineers, gain most of their skills through exposure to information and technologies associated with outdoor farming, thus creating a knowledge gap regarding newer approaches such as vertical farming.
Various vertical farms are reported to be losing money due to this lack of knowledge. For instance, supplying indoor systems with CO2, an essential component in the process of photosynthesis is crucial to ensure optimal plant growth, however, only a limited number of growers were aware of this. The confusion for many growers stems from the fact that outdoor farmers do not provide CO2 to their crops.
In order to fill this knowledge gap, extensive research is essential for vertical farming. In the fast-developing sciences of biotechnology and nutrition, controlled growing conditions and year-round production provided by vertical farms may be useful in getting a better understanding of the physiological, nutritional, and molecular processes of vertically grown crops.
Initiatives such as “Upstart University” are already offering online training courses about various techniques utilized in vertical farming such as hydroponics and aquaponics. Moreover, by providing these online training courses to agriculture students, they will not only gain a better understanding of the industry but also be more inclined to pursue it.
8. Pollination is more difficult
Pollination entails the transfer of pollen from the another of one flower to the stigma of another resulting in fertilization and the production of seeds and fruits. The pollination process in outdoor farming is carried out by bees, birds, wind, and other natural pollinators. The absence of these pollinators in vertical farming represents a major challenge that if not addressed could result in substantial economic losses. Poor pollination rates often result in poor fruit sets and the production of small and misshapen fruits. While hand-pollinating crops is an effective way of solving this problem in small farms, it can quickly become a hassle for vertical farms that span millions of square meters.
In order to solve this problem, various companies have developed innovative methods that can be applied to any vertical farm, regardless of its size. The US-based “Polybee” has developed small drones called pilots that can fly from flower to flower and pollinate them. The technology is currently used for pollinating vertically grown crops like tomatoes, peppers, and eggplants. Furthermore, an Israeli company ‘Edete‘ has developed an automated laser that can locate almond flowers and blow pollen into them. Currently, this technology is only used in outdoor farming, but it shows great promise for future use in vertical farming as well.
9. High dependence on technology working correctly
A typical vertical farm relies on technology to ensure the smooth operation of critical systems, such as temperature, lighting, irrigation, and humidity. Vertical farming’s reliance on technology also makes it susceptible to unpredicted events as even the most sophisticated equipment and software can suffer from malfunctions and glitches.
For instance, the occurrence of power outages even for a short period can result in catastrophic losses if not addressed immediately. Power outages can be fatal for plants because irrigation is usually done by pumps that operate on power and without power, they won’t be able to bring water with nutrients to the roots. And since there is no soil serving as a buffer, the plant can dry out really quickly.
Having maintenance engineers on staff can help vertical farms avoid technical problems and ensure all equipment is functioning properly and that problems are identified before they arise. Moreover, having a backup power system that is activated when the primary source of energy fails can help to avoid damages.
<<<
---
Fun list, BABYF mentioned twice>>>
VEGAN AND SUSTAINABLE
STOCKS + ETFS
https://www.vegpreneur.org/vegan-stocks
More and more people are looking for sustainable investment opportunities. Luckily, there are opportunities to put your money in companies that don’t just value profits, but also their impact on people, animals, and the planet. Depending on your strategy there are various ways for you to invest your funds. From stocks to private companies, there is sure to be a way for you to put your money to good work. Discover the most up to date list of vegan, climate tech, sustainable, earth-friendly, eco-focused, and impact focused companies on the stock market. This list is updated from time to time with the latest investment opportunities!
Reminder:
This is not financial or investment advice. Please consult a financial advisor/expert when making investment decisions. Investing is risky.
Publicly Traded Companies (Public Stocks)
Once a company goes public, it can be found on the publicly traded stock market under a ticker symbol (for example, Beyond Meat can be found under ticker BYND). Not every company can be found on every stock exchange though depending on various factors (location, etc.). Be sure to find out which markets you can access through your broker (Robinhood, Interactive Brokers, WeBull, etc.).
How Do I Trade Stocks?
We recommend using WeBull (get 4 free stocks when you sign up with this link) or Robinhood (get 1 free stock when you sign up with this link) if you are located in the USA. If you are outside the US, we recommend looking into Interactive Brokers.
Food + Beverage
Beyond Meat (NASDAQ:BYND) (100% vegan ??)
Laird Superfood (NASDAQ:LSF) (100% vegan ??)
The Very Good Food Company (OTCMKTS:VRYYF) (100% vegan ??)
Else Nutrition (OTCMKTS:BABYF) (100% vegan ??)
Sol Cuisine (TSX: VEG) (100% vegan ??)
Zevia (NYSE: ZVIA) (100% vegan ??)
The Planting Hope Company (TSXV:MYLK) (100% vegan ??)
MGP Ingredients (Nasdaq:MGPI)
Vegano Foods (CNSX: VAGN) (100% vegan ??)
Forum II Merger Corporation (NASDAQ:FMCI)
Eat Beyond (CSE: EATS or OTCMKTS: EATBF)
Ingredion Incorporated (NYSE: INGR)
Sensible Meats (NEO: HOTD) (100% vegan ??)
AAK (STO: AAK)
Celsius Holdings (NASDAQ: CELH) (100% vegan ??)
Farmmi (NASDAQ: FAMI)
SenzaGen (STO: SENZA)
Local Bounti (NYSE: LOCL)
Oatly (NASDAQ: OTLY) (100% vegan ??)
Modern Meat (CSE: MEAT or OTCMKTS: SUVRF)
Else Nutrition (TSX Venture Exchange: BABY)
Total Produce PLC (LSE: TOT)
Burcon Nutrascience (TSX: BU) (NASDAQ: BRCN) (Frankfurt: WKN 157793)
Simris Alg (FRA: 5LU or STO: SIMRIS ALG)
Globally Local (TSX: GBLY) (100% vegan ??)
National Beverage Corp. (NASDAQ: FIZZ)
Mission Produce (NASDAQ: AVO)
Billy Goat Brands (CSE: GOAT or FRA: 26B)
Natural Order Acquisition Units (NASDAQ: NOACU)
Plant & Co. Brands Ltd (OTCMKTS: VEGNF)
PlantX (CNSX: VEGA) (100% vegan ??)
Komo Comfort Foods (CSE:YUM) (100% vegan ??)
Impossible Foods - Coming Soon!
JUST - Coming Soon!
Perfect Day - Coming Soon!
Veganz (VEZ.F) (Frankfurt, Germany) (100% vegan ??)
Vejii (CNSX: VEJ) (100% vegan ??)
Farming
AppHarvest (NASDAQ: APPH)
Federal Oats Mills ready for plant-based boom
Let's hope RIBT's management is getting their MGI Oat and barley mill ready too.
https://www.world-grain.com/articles/18130-federal-oats-mills-ready-for-plant-based-boom
PENANG, MALAYSIA — With its new state-of-the-art oat mill in Malaysia, Federal Oats Mills (FOM) is positioned to meet the ever-growing needs of the plant-based beverage and meat industries.
That was a key factor in deciding to build the new facility in Penang Science Park in Penang, Malaysia. Overall, the demand for oats has expanded significantly in the last 15 years, and FOM needed more capacity than was available at its original mill in Butterworth, Penang. That facility, built in 1965, had a capacity of 5 tonnes per hour (tph).
Completed in 2020 after 24 months of building and installation, the new mill has a production capacity of 10 tph and can be expanded to 25 tph.
The facility features a total floor area of more than 260,000 square feet and produces various oat products such as oat flakes, kilned dried hulled oats, oat bran and oat flour. Integrated packing lines pack products in everything from a 40-gram sachet to a 1-tonne bulk bag for retail, foodservice, and food and beverage manufacturers.
“We envision FOM to be the leading oats brand in Asia and the Middle East through our Captain Oats range of products, the preferred partner for private labels and the No. 1 choice for plant-based food and beverage manufacturers,” said Michael Chew, deputy managing director of FOM. “We may not be the biggest oats mill around but I’m confident that our diversified portfolio and service through over 50 years of expertise will make FOM a major player in the oat market in the future.”
A history in oats
FOM was founded in 1965 by the late Chew Choo Han (Michael Chew’s grandfather) as part of his plan to expand the family’s biscuit and flour businesses. He had a hunch that producing oatmeal was a potential business opportunity.
During British colonial rule, Malaysians were exposed to oatmeal porridge. Post-war, they became aware of the health benefits of oatmeal as a natural supplement for heart health due to its high beta-glucan content.
The mill’s initial location in Butterworth provided a skilled workforce pool, robust supply chain, strong infrastructure and government support. Shortly after its initial startup, FOM created its Captain Oats brand, which was exported successfully to the Middle East in the 1970s. Exports gradually expanded across Asia and Africa, with its products now available on supermarket shelves in more than 30 countries.
Originally, the mill had a capacity of 1.5 tph but it underwent numerous upgrades through the years until the capacity reached 5 tph.
But FOM quickly outgrew the facility and opted to construct a new mill in collaboration with Uzwil, Switzerland-based Bühler. FOM had worked with the company before on several milling projects.
“Bühler is an expert in this field, and we benefited from their technical know-how and open platform where we got to engage their experts from Uzwil, Switzerland, to design and build the oats mill,” FOM said. “With Bühler’s plant design, we are ready to meet future demand for oats through additional product streams within our plant or through expansion of our existing capacity.”
Given the wide scope of the project, a main challenge was the coordination among various stakeholders, such as architects, civil engineers, contractors and machine suppliers, in different phases of the project.
“We appreciate Bühler’s professionalism and holistic support throughout the different phases of the project,” FOM said.
State-of-the-art processing
The seven-floor milling process includes cleaning, dehulling, kilning, cutting, steaming, flaking and packing.
FOM imports raw oats in containers that go through security and cleanliness checking before the tipping process. To meet the diverse demands from its customers, FOM works closely with a select group of Australian oat suppliers for the highest quality oats. It also ensures that the oats are sustainably farmed and certified in keeping in line with the global drive toward sustainability and traceability, FOM said.
Raw oats are transferred to the pre-cleaning process before they are stored in the silos. FOM has more than 16,000 tonnes of storage capacity. The raw oats go through TAS (a high-capacity pre-cleaning machine), Sortex A with SmartEject technology to detect and remove impurities, destoner and intended separators in the cleaning process. All coarse and light impurities are removed.
Next, the cleaned oats are dehulled, separating the hulls from groats. All oat groats then go through the kilning process or hydrothermal treatment. In this stage, an enzyme in the groats is deactivated to ensure a high level of food safety compliance.
The kilned oats are cut according to the specifications of instant oats and quick cooking oats. Rolled oats bypass the cutting process. The cut groats or whole groats go through a streaming process where the groats’ structure is strengthened for the flaking process. At the same time, the streaming process adds to the food safety assurance.
Steamed groats are rolled into flakes with the desired thickness. Quality checks are done at this stage to ensure the flakes are meeting the specifications.
FOM has several packing lines for different packing formats such as pouch, sachet, jar, tin can and industrial bag. The packing and storage processes are supported by an ERP system to comply with traceability requirements. The mill is certified by global food authorities (MS 1480, ISO 22000, FSSC 22000), Halal certified and non-GMO certified.
Automated packing lines can pack oat products in consumer pouches, tin cans and reusable jars ranging from 40 grams to 2 kg. FOM can also pack 25-kg bags and 1-tonne bulk bags for industrial users.
Growth of oats
The facility has allowed FOM to broaden its supply toward the plant-based beverage and meat industries, where it has seen tremendous growth in recent years. It also increased automation within FOM’s operations and provided better control of the entire oat milling process.
All aspects of the facility — the production building, grain intake and grain storage silos — were designed and built for future expansion of the mill. FOM said it frequently reviews development of the oats market and evaluates the opportunities for further expansion.
Oats have increased in popularity as society seeks a healthier lifestyle and diets. Oats are one of the most nutritious grains with multiple health benefits. Additionally, they are versatile in food and beverage preparations and one of the main drivers of the current plant-based trend globally, FOM said.
“We believe that the oats segment will continue to grow in line with the positive trajectory of the plant-based trend,” it said.
Yes, the RIBT chart setup looks great for a move to 2, and then the 200 MA (2.84) and 3 area will be in the crosshairs. Will keep fingers crossed :o)
---
$RIBT traded all day above the 100 day moving average for the first time since the bottom. The tape shows the move was fueled by the bid being raised, good sign as smarter buyers are coaxing weak holders into selling.. The $1.30 official close was was exactly double the 12/16/22 intraday low of .65. The next test is the 200 day MA at $2.84. The lower channel line is rising at about 36% per month. That is a nice sustainable increase, IMO. If it lasts until the August CC, we'd be over $7.60, yes, probably slim chance of that, unless good news comes out. Super news and bast off time.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=RIBT&p=D&yr=0&mn=7&dy=0&id=p88393334426
>>> Angel Yeast plans plant-based organic nitrogen sources production line
Food Navigation Europe
https://www.foodnavigator.com/News/Promotional-Features/Angel-Yeast-plans-plant-based-organic-nitrogen-sources-production-line
Building an intelligent production line for plant-based nitrogen sources
Nitrogen is essential to biomanufacturing. Because the element is a key media ingredient for cell culture, manufacturers of large molecule medicines and other biologic products need reliable access to stable, high-quality nitrogen.
The status of nitrogen as an essential nutrient for biomanufacturing reflects its role as a building block for ribonucleic acids, amino acids, and proteins and its ability to promote high numbers of cells during the fermentation process. As a key enabler of biomanufacturing, nitrogen is used across a number of vital and fast-growing areas, including the production of biologic medicines and artificial meats.
Traditionally, companies used organic nitrogen sources of animal origin to support biomanufacturing. However, authorities including the European Pharmacopoeia and the US Pharmacopeia now ask medical product manufacturers to prioritize materials from “non-transmissible spongiform encephalopathy-related animal species” or “non-animal origin” to minimize safety risks associated with infectious agents.
At the same time, biomanufacturers have identified plant nitrogen sources as a more sustainable option that supports a harmonious coexistence between human beings and nature. The energy crisis is also disrupting the nitrogen market and steering biomanufacturers toward plant-based sources.1??
Biomanufacturers need to manage the transition to plant organic nitrogen smoothly to maintain their upward trajectory, which is tipped to drive a 12.5% compound annual growth rate for biologic medicines from 2021 to 2030.2?? Yet, the fast-growing global industry faces a shortage of companies capable of providing high-end plant organic nitrogen, creating a pressing need for new entrants with the scale and expertise needed to meet rising demand.
Why nitrogen production is challenging
The production of plant organic nitrogen poses three sets of challenges: meeting key quality indicators; handling multiple plant species on the same manufacturing line; and establishing a quality system that improves product stability.
Addressing the quality indicator challenge entails the pre-treatment of plant protein raw materials and directional enzymatic digestion, the removal of nutrient-inhibiting components, endotoxins, and other heat-source components, and the development of process technology. Mastery of all those elements is needed to consistently produce nitrogen with the desired solubility, content, and degree of hydrolysis of endotoxin and other indicators.
The second challenge reflects the wide range of plant species that are used to produce the variety of nitrogen sources required by the biomanufacturing industry. There are large differences between the physicochemical properties of different materials, making flexible manufacturing capabilities essential to the co-production of multiple varieties of plant organic sources on single manufacturing lines.
Rising to the challenge entails the design of multi-functional production lines that are made up of carefully chosen and verified equipment at each process link and supported by technical and engineering experience. Integrating tangential flow ultrafiltration, multi-stage continuous centrifugation, and other key equipment brings further benefits, resulting in production lines capable of producing plant peptones from soy, wheat, pea, chickpea, and more.
The third core challenge is to implement an effective quality system and standardize the raw materials, production process, and inspection. While manufacturing lines need to be flexible, management of the production process must be standardized to provide customers with stable, safe, effective, and traceable plant organic nitrogen sources. Nitrogen suppliers should also use fully certified, non-GMO raw materials that are free from animal products and meet International Organization for Standardization (ISO) criteria.
How Angel Yeast entered the market
Angel Yeast, the largest yeast extract supplier in the world, has worked through the challenges faced by new entrants to the nitrogen market, positioning it to open a production line with a capacity of 5,000 tonnes in Binzhou, Shandong province. The facility will produce a wide range of peptones derived from soy, wheat, corn, and pea, giving Angel Yeast a globally unique portfolio that spans nitrogen products and yeast-sourced fermentation nutrients that can be combined to improve downstream performance.
Work to build on the platform provided by the plant is underway. Angel Yeast plans to develop more categories of organic plant nitrogen sources to meet the needs of different markets and customers while also offering customized services. The expansion plan covers applications including plant protein products, food flavoring, special medical diets, nutrition and healthcare, and biological agriculture.
Angel Yeast began the expansion project with the goal of establishing the most complete plant organic nitrogen source production line in the world. With the opening of the production, the company has taken a step toward the realization of that objective, positioning it to support manufacturers in Europe and other parts of the world as they transition toward more sustainable sources of organic nitrogen.
References?
1.? Energy chaos disrupts European nitrogen market? (2022).
2. ?Biopharmaceuticals market size to surpass US$ 856.1 billion
<<<
---
>>> ADM Ventures investing in its vision of the future
01.23.2023
By Keith Nunes
https://www.bakingbusiness.com/articles/58234-adm-ventures-investing-in-its-vision-of-the-future
CHICAGO — The future of food and beverage innovation may run through the myriad venture capital investment groups seeking to launch and scale potentially disruptive technologies and services. For ADM Ventures, the venture capital arm of ADM, Chicago, the future of food may emerge from six broad categories, including alternative protein, human nutrition, health and wellness and the microbiome, animal nutrition, sustainability and biomaterials, and agriculture technologies.
“One of the first focus areas for ADM Ventures was alternative proteins,” said Darren Streiler, vice president of venture capital. “ADM has an over 75-year history in plant-based proteins, but ADM Ventures was charged with looking beyond ADM's business in plant proteins.
“We are looking at new ways to manufacture proteins. What is disruptive about some of these technologies is it is changing how protein is being manufactured. Instead of relying on livestock and animals, you can have a very small manufacturing footprint in any country. I think Singapore is a good example. You can establish protein factories in such a small area.”
The focus on alternative proteins led the group to invest in a cross-section of companies vying for funding and scale, including Air Protein, Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat), Geltor, Nature’s Fynd and Perfect Day. Recently, ADM Ventures has shifted its focus toward the other five categories.
“Where we've been most active lately is in health and wellness in and around the microbiome, and pet nutrition,” Mr. Streiler said.
Recent investments include Bond Pet Foods, Boulder, Colo., which raised $17.5 million in a Series A round, and Innovafeed, Paris, a processor and supplier of insects for use in animal and plant nutrition that raised $250 million in a Series D round. Both were announced in September 2022.
When considering investments, ADM Ventures takes a variety of topics into consideration regarding personnel and technologies.
“No. 1 is passion,” Mr. Streiler said about what he looks for in founders. “These folks go through some time where its fits and starts. There is not going to be hockey stick growth. They need to be passionate and knowledgeable about the industry they are going into.
“Then there is the question of product fit. What is the market demanding? What niche areas can they find? Where can they begin selling and executing? That is where you see a lot of creativity come in.”
When evaluating the potential of a technology or service, a key question is what impact will it have?
“Disruptive is an idea, product or service that helps to solve a problem in new ways; it makes meaningful change,” Mr. Streiler said. “In order to disrupt the market, you have to find that niche.”
Startup founders must also be willing to work with ADM.
“First and foremost, it is a mandatory requirement that we collaborate with all of our startups,” Mr. Streiler said. “We're trying to drive results. We use our extensive network and assets in ingredients and services to leverage that to help these startups go to market much faster than they would.”
An example is New Culture, San Leandro, Calif., a producer of animal-free casein and mozzarella that raised $25 million in a Series A funding round in November 2021 that ADM Ventures participated. Less than a year later the two companies entered into a partnership to advance the development and commercialization of New Culture’s products.
“We’re working toward accelerating New Culture’s foodservice and consumer applications with the support of our global product development and flavor resources, further accelerating technical capabilities to make plant-based cheese alternatives more delicious and accessible for consumers,” Mr. Streiler said. “The addition of New Culture’s casein enables their animal-free cheese to stretch and melt, something that’s never successfully been done before with alternative cheeses.”
He added that ADM is the “largest fermentation player in North America” and New Culture now has access to ADM’s scale to increase its alternative casein production.
“We have a lot of assets to move from pilot to scale,” Mr. Streiler said. “New Culture is a wonderful example of how we leverage existing assets to develop a novel technology. They have figured out how to make casein with precision fermentation. We are helping them reach full scale production much quicker. These assets are very expensive to manufacture and build. We have those assets.”
Mr. Streiler has been in his role with ADM since 2018 and has worked with numerous startups. In his experience, he has learned what some of the most difficult challenges are to bring a food technology concept to market. One is finding someone adept at working with the Food and Drug Administration and understands the regulatory process.
“A regulatory resource is hard to come by,” he said. “There is a shortage of people who know how to bring novel ingredients through FDA. They are expensive to hire and in short supply. We recommend consultants to help them.”
Another area is adding scale.
“It is a skill to take something that is in a pilot to full scale commercial production, particularly for food ingredients,” Mr. Streiler said. “That's our core business and it's something startups can tap in to.”
Choosing where to make investments can be more art than science. There are numerous factors that go into the decision-making process. Mr. Streiler said one advantage ADM Ventures has is access to the company’s Outside Voices market research.
“We do heavily rely on them for the current and future trends,” he said. “We leverage that group to understand consumer behaviors. That knowledge helps to shape our investments.
“We can go back to alternative protein. We saw this trend forming much earlier because of our place in the market. Groups like (Outside Voices) helped us understand where we should be focusing.”
<<<
---
Looks like a nice chart setup for RIBT developing. 1.25 looks like the key resistance level to watch, which was the trading range from Oct/Nov, and was also the recent Feb high area. The 100 MA is also in this general area (1.19).
If it can get through 1.25 that would be a great sign, and then 1.50 will be beckoning. The Q-4 quarter and 2022 full year results should be coming, along with an overall business update, so hopefully a positive push from those :o)
---
$RIBT finally traded above the Ichimoku Cloud all day and the 20 day MA held. The next hurdle is the 100 day Moving Average. And above average volume for the day.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=RIBT&p=D&yr=0&mn=5&dy=0&id=p58129432415
Robobees Are Back — This Time In The Image Of A “Fairy” That “Could Help Save The Planet”
Tough cut and paste for me>>>>>
https://www.naturalblaze.com/2023/02/robobees-are-back-this-time-in-the-image-of-a-fairy-that-could-help-save-the-planet.html
$RIBT broke a declining resistance today and it broke away from the 50 day MA. Looks like it goes through the 100 day MA soon up toward $3. By then we should have the Q4 and year end SEC filings. Last year that was on March 17th. Hopefully good news then or before.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=RIBT&p=D&yr=1&mn=0&dy=0&id=p76610759797
Nice pop for RIBT, and strong volume :o)
No company specific news that I saw, but that article you posted (excerpt below) says that the Chinese govt is pushing for rice bran to supplement diets, so maybe that helped light a fire under the stock. With over 1.4 billion people to feed, that's a lot of rice bran :o)
The stock is closing in on the 100 MA (1.27), and next stop might be the 1.50-1.75 area, based on the chart. Then 2.00 or more seems possible if the momentum builds and continues :o)
RIBT's market cap is so small, still only ~ $7 mil, and the stock could potentially recover a ton of ground if business picks up strongly. That 3-9 area looks like a good longer term target to shoot for. 3 is the 200 MA and 9 was the June high from last year.
>>> the Chinese Communist Party says the country has reaped bountiful harvests for the past 13 years. But at the same time, it’s encouraging citizens to add something called rice bran into their diets. The fiber is usually reserved for livestock feed and fuel-making, and was only consumed widely by Chinese people some 60 years ago, during the Great Famine. <<<
---
Beijing Promotes Rice Bran as Food Amid Famine Fears
https://www.theepochtimes.com/beijing-promotes-rice-bran-as-food-amid-famine-fears_5021445.html?&utm_medium=ChinaInFocus&utm_source=SocialM&utm_campaign=FoodShortageFamine&utm_content=1-30-2023
Does China have enough food to feed its people? After months of summertime flooding in recent years and a three-year COVID-19 lockdown that locked farmers inside their homes and away from their fields, the Chinese Communist Party says the country has reaped bountiful harvests for the past 13 years. But at the same time, it’s encouraging citizens to add something called rice bran into their diets. The fiber is usually reserved for livestock feed and fuel-making, and was only consumed widely by Chinese people some 60 years ago, during the Great Famine.
>>> Japan firm opens whale meat vending machines to push sales
Jan 2023
By MARI YAMAGUCHI and KWIYEON HA
Associated Press
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/japan-firm-opens-whale-meat-vending-machines-to-push-sales/ar-AA16PH9j?OCID=ansmsnnews11
YOKOHAMA, Japan (AP) — A Japanese whaling operator, after struggling for years to promote its products amid protests from conservationists, has found a new way to cultivate clientele and bolster sales: whale meat vending machines.
The outlet features white vending machines decorated with cartoon whales and is the third location to launch in the Japanese capital region. It opened Tuesday after two others were introduced in Tokyo earlier this year as part of Kyodo Senpaku Co.'s new sales drive.
Whale meat has long been a source of controversy but sales in the new vending machines have quietly gotten off to a good start, the operator says. Anti-whaling protests have subsided since Japan in 2019 terminated its much-criticized research hunts in the Antarctic and resumed commercial whaling off the Japanese coasts.
Conservationists say they are worried the move could be a step toward expanded whaling.
“The issue is not the vending machines themselves but what they may lead to," said Nanami Kurasawa, head of the Iruka & Kujira (Dolphin & Whale) Action Network.
Kurasawa noted the whaling operator is already asking for additional catches and to expand whaling outside of the designated waters.
Kyodo Senpaku hopes to set up vending machines at 100 locations nationwide in five years, company spokesperson Konomu Kubo told The Associated Press. A fourth is to open in Osaka next month.
The idea is to open vending machines near supermarkets, where whale meat is usually unavailable, to cultivate demand, a task crucial for the industry's survival.
Major supermarket chains have largely stayed away from whale meat to avoid protests by anti-whaling groups and remain cautious even though harassment from activists has subsided, Kubo said.
“As a result, many consumers who want to eat it cannot find or buy whale meat. We launched vending machines at unmanned stores for those people,” he said.
Company officials say sales at the two Tokyo outlets have been significantly higher than expected, keeping staff busy replenishing products.
At the store in the Motomachi district of Yokohama, a posh shopping area near Chinatown, 61-year-old customer Mami Kashiwabara went straight for whale bacon, her father's favorite. To her disappointment it was sold out, and she settled for frozen onomi, tail meat that is regarded as a rare delicacy.
Kashiwabara says she is aware of the whaling controversy but that whale meat brings back her childhood memories of eating it at family dinners and school lunches.
“I don’t think it’s good to kill whales meaninglessly. But whale meat is part of Japanese food culture and we can respect the lives of whales by appreciating their meat,” Kashiwabara said. "I would be happy if I can eat it.”
Kashiwabara said she planned to share her purchase of a 3,000 yen ($23) handy-size chunk, neatly wrapped in a freezer bag, with her husband over sake.
The meat mostly comes from whales caught off Japan's northeastern coast.
Japan resumed commercial whaling in July 2019 after withdrawing from the International Whaling Commission, ending 30 years of what it called research whaling, which had been criticized by conservationists as a cover for commercial hunts banned by the IWC in 1988.
Under its commercial whaling in the Japanese exclusive economic zone, Japan last year caught 270 whales, less than 80% of the quota and fewer than the number it once hunted in the Antarctic and the northwestern Pacific in its research program.
The decline occurred because fewer minke whales were found along the coast. Kurasawa says the reason for the smaller catch should be examined to see if it is linked to overhunting or climate change.
In a show of determination to keep the whaling industry alive in the coming decades, Kyodo Senpaku will construct a 6 billion yen ($46 million) new mother ship for launch next year to replace the aging Nisshin Maru.
But uncertainty remains.
Whaling is losing support in other whaling nations such as Iceland, where only one whaler remains.
Whales may also be moving away from the Japanese coasts due to a scarcity of saury, a staple of their diet, and other fish possibly due to the impact of climate change, Kubo said.
Whaling in Japan involves only a few hundred people and one operator and accounted for less than 0.1% of total meat consumption in recent years, according to Fisheries Agency data.
Still, conservative governing lawmakers staunchly support commercial whaling and consumption of the meat as part of Japan’s cultural tradition.
Conservationists say whale meat is no longer part of the daily diet in Japan, especially for younger generations.
Whale meat was an affordable source of protein during Japan's undernourished years after World War II, with annual consumption peaking at 233,000 tons in 1962.
Whale was quickly replaced by other meats. The whale meat supply fell to 6,000 tons in 1986, the year before the moratorium on commercial whaling imposed by the IWC banned the hunting of several whale species.
Under the research whaling, criticized as a cover for commercial hunts because the meat was sold on the market, Japan caught as many as 1,200 whales annually. It has since drastically cut back its catch after international protests escalated and whale meat supply and consumption slumped at home.
Annual meat supply had fluctuated in a range of 3,000-5,000 tons, including imports from Norway and Iceland. The amount further fell in 2019 to 2,000 tons, or 20 grams (less than 1 ounce) of whale meat per person a year, the Fisheries Agency statistics show.
Whaling officials attributed the shrinking supply in the past three years to the absence of imports due to the pandemic, and plan to nearly double this year's supply with imports of more than 2,500 tons from Iceland.
Japan managed to get Iceland's only remaining whaler to hunt fin whales exclusively for shipment to Japan, whaling officials said. Iceland caught only one minke whale in the 2021 season, according to the IWC.
Criticizing Iceland’s export to Japan, the International Fund for Animal Welfare said it “opposes all commercial whaling as it is inherently cruel.”
With uncertain outlook for imports, Kyodo Senpaku wants the government to raise Japan’s annual catch quota to levels that can supply about 5,000 tons, which Kubo describes as the threshold to maintain the industry.
“From a long-term perspective, I think it would be difficult to sustain the industry at the current supply levels,” Kubo said. “We must expand both supply and demand, which have both shrunk.”
With the extremely limited supply, whale meat processing cannot be a viable business and may not last for the next generations, he added.
Yuki Okoshi, who started serving whale meat dishes at his Japanese-style seafood restaurant three years ago when higher quality whale meat became available under commercial whaling, said he hopes whale meat supply will stabilize.
Okoshi said “the future of the whale industry depends on whether customers need us" and that whale meat restaurants could hold the key to survival.
“Whaling can be a political issue, but relationships between the restaurant and our customers is very simple," Okoshi said. “We serve good food at reasonable prices and customers are happy. That’s all there is to it."
<<<
---
>> seen it all <<
Yes, and looks like a lot of red flags with RIBT -- a Ch 11 filing, two rev splits, yikes.
I was similarly thrashed by some micro stocks, so now just follow them for fun. Only two now under 1 bil market cap (link below), and both are conservative with tiny $500 positions. No more 'gun-slinging ' for me :o)
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Portfolio-Ideas-40985
---
In 2010 to 2011 RIBT went from .05(,04 intra day} to .36(.38 intra day. The point 05 was a chapter 11 filing. After that the stock had a 1 for 200 split in 2013 and the recent 1 for to. So the .05 low shows it at $140 and the top in 2011 as $720. LOL.
But my point is, that .05 to .36 in 10 months happened with no meanigful news.
Yes, I have been an in and out trader of RIBT since August 2006. I got out in 2007 with a 4 bagger and stayed out until the BK and took a flyer at .05 BK, a small trade. Got out again and back in and out. I fell in love in 2017 when Continental grain bought in. So, I am basically underwater all together. now I just added at .6924(average) and increased my share couint 77%, but still ashamed to tell you my average. My point is I have seen it all.
Does this mean RIBT will have another 7X rally with no news? LOL, probably not.
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/RIBT/chart?p=RIBT#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
One concern is RIBT's new pet food product. At the CC in November they were waiting on a new screen for the process of making a spray out of rice bran for they system. Since no PR, it is very possible it is not fixed.
Yes I hope the 50 holds. It looks like short term traders got out of their bottom play, volume is tiny today?
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=RIBT&p=D&yr=0&mn=3&dy=0&id=p25829017290
Looks like RIBT is maintaining the 50 MA, on low volume, but it may need some news flow to get things moving. No press releases since early Nov, so they may be due.
Last year they had the Q4 and full year results out in March, but it would be nice to see something before then, maybe a general 'business update'.
---
Money can still be made in plant based and maybe cultured meat, it is bigger now than 3 years ago, but good luck finding a good investment. Impossible was to have an IPO about a year or more ago, well........................
On topic news out recently, mostly today, with disruptive technologie articles >>>
https://www.foodbusinessnews.net/articles/23062-plant-based-cheese-dip-maker-rebrands
https://www.fooddive.com/news/believer-meats-north-carolina-facility-2023/640786/
https://www.foodingredientsfirst.com/news/chocolate-extraveganza-cargill-powers-up-plant-based-portfolio-with-sunflower-kernel-and-rice-syrup-powders.html
https://www.bakingbusiness.com/articles/58234-adm-ventures-investing-in-its-vision-of-the-future
https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2023/01/23/An-even-more-sustainable-milk-alternative-Oat-milk-powder-developed-to-cut-packaging-by-90
https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2023/01/23/beneo-takes-next-step-in-plant-based-protein-strategy-with-start-up-investment
https://www.foodnavigator.com/News/Promotional-Features/Angel-Yeast-plans-plant-based-organic-nitrogen-sources-production-line
https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2023/01/20/Cultivated-meat-in-focus-at-Tufts-cellular-ag-innovation-day-From-bioreactor-bottlenecks-to-a-global-battle-cry-for-government-funding
https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2023/01/19/why-the-first-mass-produced-cultured-meat-product-won-t-be-food
https://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/Article/2023/01/23/Mibelle-launches-haskap-berry-powder-into-sports-nutrition-market
https://www.nutraingredients.com/Article/2023/01/23/the-glucose-revolution-are-you-ready
Another BYND ex resigns>>>
Beyond Meat chief brand officer departs
https://www.fooddive.com/news/beyond-meat-chief-brand-officer-departs/640328/
Beyond Meat’s chief brand officer left the plant-based meat company this week, adding to a high level of executive turnover during the last five months. The story was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
Beth Moskowitz told employees in an internal email on Wednesday that it was her last day with the company, according to the Journal’s report. Moskowitz had been with Beyond Meat since December 2018, her LinkedIn profile indicates.
In an email, a Beyond Meat spokesperson confirmed that Moskowitz left the company. Beyond Meat has hired an executive to lead global marketing for the company, who is slated to begin work next month, the spokesperson said. The company did not identify who it is.
The publicly traded plant-based meat company has had a difficult year with slowing or stagnant sales growth, supply chain challenges and large startup costs for new product lines. It has seen several executives leave their positions, both out of personal choice and as part of layoffs instituted by the company to save on operating costs.
In September, former chief supply chain officer Bernie Adcock left the company to become the head of retail and QSR for Pilgrim’s Pride. Beyond Meat chose not to replace him and eliminated that position.
Then, as part of wider layoffs that cut 19% of the company’s total workforce in October, former global chief growth officer and President of North America Deanna Jurgens lost her job. That role was eliminated. The company also let go of former chief operating officer Doug Ramsey, who was suspended at the time following his arrest on charges related to what police say was a road rage-inspired physical altercation.
Beyond Meat also has a new chief financial officer, after former CFO Phil Hardin left the company to pursue another position in October. Lubi Kutua, who had been the company’s vice president for financial planning and analysis and investor relations, took over the CFO’s job in October.
Chart>>>>
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=BYND&p=D&yr=4&mn=0&dy=0&id=p17327545416
Another stock that was clobbered big but may be poised to recover is Generac (GNRC), the maker of the back-up power generators you see everywhere (article below). It was one of those ultra popular stocks that took off huge in the aftermath of the 2020 Covid crash, but then the air came out in 2022. I'm figuring it's a solid long term buy/hold type stock for patient investors. The current chart reminds me of RIBT's -
>>> Could the Worst Stock in the S&P 500 in 2022 Be a Buy in 2023?
Motley Fool
By Michael Byrne
Jan 15, 2023
https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/01/15/could-the-worst-stock-in-the-sp-500-in-2022-be-a-b/?source=eptyholnk0000202&utm_source=yahoo-host&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=article
KEY POINTS
Generac stock got crushed in 2022, and plummeted even further in the fall after management cut its guidance.
The company is still growing at an impressive clip.
Generac's valuation now looks a lot more palatable.
While the whole market was down in 2022, few stocks had a worse year than Generac (GNRC 3.01%). In fact, with a decline of 71%, it was the worst performer of the year in the S&P 500.
The maker of backup generators and other power-generating devices was a high flyer for much of 2021, when its market cap essentially doubled. But the stock began to decline after peaking in late 2021 and went on to lose an incredible 71% of its value in 2022. Generac investors are licking their wounds after a terrible 2022, but is there any reason for optimism that the beleaguered stock can bounce back in 2023?
I've got the power
Generac is best known for its generators which serve the residential and commercial markets. In recent years, it has also increasingly used acquisitions to diversify into additional areas like solar, battery storage, and energy management systems. The company has a great track record of long-term revenue growth, increasing sales at an outstanding 18% compound annual rate since going public in 2010.
It's the undisputed heavyweight in home generators, with a market share of about 75%. However, it still has a long runway for growth ahead as it estimates that this market is only 5.5% penetrated. Management sees further growth in home standby generation as a significant opportunity, and it's feasible that the severe winter storms of December 2022, which caused millions of customers across 13 states to lose power, will reinforce homeowners' interest in having backup power sources. Generac says that every additional percentage point of penetration for backup generators adds an additional $2.5 billion in addressable market for the company.
While this is a large opportunity in its core market, Generac also says that the acquisitions it has made over the past few years have expanded the size of its served addressable market by 500% since 2018. The company now makes inverters, which convert the DC electricity that solar panels generate into AC electricity -- the type that the grid supplies and our homes and businesses use. That's a market with potential -- solar power's installed capacity is expected to grow at a 12.7% compound annual rate over the next five years.
Beyond solar, the company has also moved into battery-powered lawnmowers with the acquisition of Mean Green, smart-home solutions with the acquisition of Ecobee, and more. If Generac can capture more market share in some of these new markets, it could add significantly to the company's growth in the years ahead.
Lower expectations create an attractive valuation
While Generac was punished for its sharp reduction in guidance, it's important to note that it hasn't suddenly turned into a slow-growth or no-growth company. This is still a profitable business, and the company still expects to report that it grew revenue by 22% to 24% in 2022. That isn't as compelling as the 36% to 40% it originally guided for, but it's still pretty impressive growth.
In some ways, Generac has been a victim of its own success, as the stock surged past $500 in October 2021 on the back of terrific growth. But as it lapped those difficult comps from 2021, its growth rate slowed, and the stock fell to just below $100 a share as of the end of 2022.
The stock contended with additional challenges over the course of the year, such as a lack of technicians to install its generators. The company now has partnerships with 8,500 dealers (300 more than the previous quarter), so it is working chip away at this challenge, and it says demand remains strong. Additionally, Generac dealt with a major customer declaring bankruptcy.
One area for concern is that the company's debt has increased significantly in recent times while its cash has decreased as it has pursued acquisitions. Total debt outstanding went from about $882 million in September of 2020 to over $1.3 billion as of the most recent quarter. The company now has a debt to EBITDA ratio of about 2.15. While this isn't egregious, it is something for investors to keep an eye on.
At this point, Generac's valuation looks undemanding. The stock trades at 15 times earnings and 14 times forward earnings, putting it just below the average multiple for the S&P 500.
Generac is actively engaging in share repurchases, and the company's Board recently authorized a new share repurchase program that will allow the company to buy back up to $500 million worth of its stock over the next two years.
With this lower valuation, and against a backdrop of lowered expectations, and more share buybacks on deck the stock looks a lot more palatable as a buy.
This won't be the worst stock in the S&P 500 again
Given the company's track record of growth and the long potential runway ahead of it, it seems likely that the present issues aret a speed bump on the road to Generac's long-term success. These lower prices offer investors a potentially favorable entry point. Janney Scott Mongomery recently initiated coverage of the stock with a buy rating, while Northland Capital went a step further, calling Generac its top pick of 2023.
Both analyst firms are of the opinion that the shares are undervalued, and Northland Capital thinks that the recent series of high-profile power outages across the United States could spur demand for home standby generators. The firms' new price targets of $160 and $180 imply meaningful upside from Generac's current share price. While such targets are best taken with a grain of salt, it's clear that there is the potential for plenty of upside ahead if Generac can get back on track, making it worthy of a small or more speculative investment for risk-tolerant investors.
<<<
---
IIf they put out news, it will be not be a pump. The Reddit boys were pumping RIBT and they are charged with pumping and dumping some other stocks. Not about RIBT, but charges could come. But, RIBT is the victim.
The top two posted ar RIBT last spring and "PJ: did the most. And RIBT is not mentioned, but RIBT mnangement does not want to appear that they are pumping. I believe the story was responsible for the last dive from $1.00 to .65. Definitely oversold at that point.
https://www.theverge.com/2022/12/14/23508963/twitter-atlas-trading-discord-pump-and-dump-sec-doj-lawsuit-criminal-charges
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=RIBT&p=D&yr=0&mn=4&dy=0&id=p11714133553
RIBT re-testing the 1.00 and 50 MA support level, so far so good. Volume on the pullback is pretty light, so a good sign. Could use some news flow to help get another up leg moving. As you said, the next target should be the 100 MA (1.39), and the broader 1.25-1.50 area.
---
Yes, RIBT looking good. It went right through 1.00 and the 50 MA without a problem. Also closed right at the high of the day, and then moved up to 1.15 in the aftermarket :o) And volume is decent, and no sign yet of a high volume blow off day that might mean a near term top.
I see what you mean about the gap from mid-Oct, which also corresponds to the 100 MA and also the Oct-Nov trading range. So that looks like the obvious target to watch -- 1.25-1.50 area. Then with some news flow, it might conceivably make a run up to 2 . Looks like momentum is building :o)
Fwiw I decided to re-enter the market modestly. Only a 2% stock allocation so far, but plan to gradually add via dollar cost average into the S+P 500 with 1 share of SPY per day. Nothing dramatic, but I figure by Summer/Fall the bear market could be winding down, so might as well have some exposure to stocks again. I figure maybe a 15% stock allocation by Summer, enough to participate, but not enough to require daily Tagamet :o)
---
---
$RIBT should close above the 50 day MA. Next is the 100 day also a gap to fill back on October 18th, double resistance around the same price.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=RIBT&p=D&yr=0&mn=5&dy=0&id=p94272385940
gap>
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/RIBT/history?p=RIBT
Volume coming up for RIBT. Should be interesting to see how it closes today, and then next week's activity :o)
---
RIBT starting to get more volume, so a good sign. Rising price on rising volume improves the validity of an up move, and it's good that the gains are steady and incremental, suggesting a longer move.
The big question now is the 1.00 level and the 50 MA (1.03). Being together they represent a bigger barrier, but once breached convincingly they then can become stronger support.
Beyond 1.00-1.03 is the mid-Oct to mid-Nov trading range, which centers around 1.25. So that would be the next target to watch once it's definitively through 1.00-1.03. Could first get some back/fill for a while around 1.00-1.03, or alternately it might go more quickly up to 1.25 and then pause for back/fill and to retest 1.00-1.03. Should be interesting :o)
I should have picked up some RIBT in late Dec like you did, but I've sworn off active trading, so it's just for fun. But sometimes chart setups are so compelling, it gets very tempting. But I've seen perfect setups blow up, or an external event will tank the broader market, so there's always risk..
The reason charts/TA work is that almost everyone on Wall St and his brother are using the same TA signals, so they become self fulfilling. Everyone uses the 50 MA, 200 MA, and previous trading zones as their support and resistance areas. They all use the same candlestick pattern signals (hammer, shooting star, etc), and chart formations (ascending triangle, head + shoulders, etc). Also volume signals.
---
It looks like the Fed will do a milder 1/4 point rise on Feb 1 (rather than 1/2 point), per Nick Timiraos (article below), who is the Fed's unofficial mouthpiece at the Wall Street Journal. It is widely known on Wall St that the Fed uses Timiraos to disseminate the Fed's guidance to the investment world. So Timiroas' articles are a 'must read' for investors, though you can usually get the main gist from the headline -
>>> Inflation Report Tees Up Likely Quarter-Point Fed Rate Rise in February. Improving inflation data suggest officials will consider a smaller increase than in recent months
The Wall Street Journal
By Nick Timiraos
Jan. 12, 2023
https://www.wsj.com/articles/inflation-report-tees-up-likely-quarter-point-fed-rate-rise-in-february-11673535597
Fresh data showing inflation eased in December are likely to keep the Fed on track to reduce the size of interest-rate increases to a quarter-percentage-point at its meeting that concludes on Feb. 1.
The Labor Department reported Thursday that consumer prices fell in December, largely reflecting lower energy prices. The consumer-price index declined 0.1% from November. The index was up 6.5% for the year, down from a recent peak increase of 9.1% in June.
The core CPI index, which excludes volatile food and energy items, rose 0.3% from November, and the 12-month increase edged lower to 5.7%, from 6.6% in September. On a three-month annualized basis, core inflation was 3.1%, the lowest such rate in more than a year and down from 7.9% in June.
Fed officials have kept their options open on whether to raise rates by either a quarter percentage point or a half percentage point at their next meeting, saying that the decision would be strongly guided by the latest data about the state of the economy.
But the improving inflation data suggest officials will strongly consider the smaller increase of a more traditional quarter point, or 25 basis points. It takes time for them to see the full effects of their policy actions, and they are trying to avoid causing unnecessary declines in employment and growth.
“In my view, hikes of 25 basis points will be appropriate going forward,” said Philadelphia Fed President Patrick Harker in remarks Thursday morning.
After holding rates near zero for two years following the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, officials raised borrowing costs more aggressively last year than at any time since the early 1980s. They lifted their benchmark federal-funds rate most recently by a half percentage point in December, to a range between 4.25% and 4.5%, following four consecutive increases of 0.75 percentage point.
Fed policy makers want the economy to slow down to cool demand and reduce inflation. Recent data suggest hiring has held steady, but a separate Labor Department report last week indicated wage growth moderated at the end of last year. Wage figures are important to the Fed because officials are nervous that the labor market’s strength could sustain wage growth that keeps inflation, as measured by their preferred Commerce Department gauge, above their 2% target.
Prices of goods such as used cars are declining, a development the Fed has anticipated for more than a year. There is evidence that soaring rents and other housing costs are set to cool notably amid a sharp slowdown in demand, though that won’t be immediately reflected in the CPI because of how it is constructed.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell has recently shifted the focus away from core inflation measures toward an even narrower subset of labor-intensive services by excluding prices for food, energy, shelter and goods. Officials believe that category could help show whether labor shortages that have been pushing up wages are passing through to consumer prices.
“We welcome these better inflation reports…but I think we’re realistic about the broader project,” Mr. Powell said last month. Despite progress on goods and housing inflation, “the big story will really be the rest of it, and…that’s going to take time.”
In an interview Monday, San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said, “I’m going to be paying a lot of attention to core services ex-housing because I’d like to see some improvement there.” That subset of prices rose 0.26% in December, well below last year’s monthly average of around 0.5%, according to economists at Morgan Stanley.
Officials are trying to balance the risk of raising rates too much with the risk of not doing enough to slow down spending and investment, which could allow higher inflation to become entrenched.
Mr. Powell said last month it was “broadly right” that the Fed’s best way to manage the risk of over-tightening would be to slow rate increases to smaller 0.25-point increments as soon as the central bank’s next meeting.
“It makes a lot of sense, it seems to me—particularly if you consider how far we’ve come,” Mr. Powell said. But he said the Fed’s actions would depend significantly on new information about the state of the economy and borrowing conditions.
Ms. Daly appeared to endorse Mr. Powell’s thinking about how to balance the risks facing the Fed on Monday. “When you’re being seriously data dependent, doing it in more gradual steps does give you the ability to respond to incoming information and account for those lags,” she said.
Most Fed policy makers last month anticipated that they would need to raise the fed-funds rate to a level above 5% this year. “I think it would behoove the committee to get into that zone as soon as we can without ignoring the data,” St. Louis Fed President James Bullard told reporters last week.
<<<
---
RIBT up to 1.00 and the 50 MA area, so will be interesting to see what happens next. Volume still somewhat muted, but maybe some news flow could be coming? Either way, a nice looking recovery underway :o)
In the broader market, the S+P 500 is testing its 200 MA area, and looks like it might keep moving up to test the Nov/Dec highs. I figure the markets may remain somewhat buoyant as long as there are no geopolitical events to upset the apple cart.
Another Fed rate decision in less than 3 weeks away, so there may be some growing angst leading up to that. The Fed doesn't like to see a strong stock market in the current environment ('wealth effect', inflation), so they may need to interject some hawkish verbiage. Just a guess. Fwiw, I'm still on the sidelines, but with cash/T-bills over 4% and no risk, I figure it's not too shabby :o)
---
Name | Symbol | % Assets |
---|---|---|
Chr. Hansen Holding A/S | CHR | 22.41% |
The Hain Celestial Group Inc | HAIN | 10.42% |
Sprouts Farmers Market Inc | SFM | 10.16% |
Ariake Japan Co Ltd | 2815 | 6.03% |
Cal-Maine Foods Inc | CALM | 4.48% |
Treatt PLC | TET.L | 4.01% |
John B Sanfilippo & Son Inc | JBSS | 3.95% |
Freedom Foods Group Ltd | FNP.AX | 3.78% |
L'Occitane International SA | 00973.HK | 3.59% |
United Natural Foods Inc | UNFI | 3.50% |
Name | Symbol | % Assets |
---|---|---|
Givaudan SA | GIVN | 6.21% |
Corteva Inc | CTVA | 5.78% |
Nutrien Ltd | NTR.TO | 4.24% |
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc | IFF | 3.91% |
Mowi ASA | MOWI | 3.75% |
Symrise AG | SY1.DE | 3.57% |
Kerry Group PLC Class A | KYGA.L | 3.39% |
FMC Corp | FMC | 3.31% |
Zoetis Inc Class A | ZTS | 3.18% |
Ecolab Inc | ECL | 3.14% |
Name | Symbol | % Assets |
---|---|---|
Deere & Co | DE | 20.51% |
Corteva Inc | CTVA | 6.75% |
Archer-Daniels Midland Co | ADM | 6.52% |
Nutrien Ltd | NTR.TO | 5.83% |
Kubota Corp | 6326 | 4.50% |
FMC Corp | FMC | 2.85% |
CNH Industrial NV | CNHI.L | 2.83% |
The Mosaic Co | MOS | 2.35% |
The Toro Co | TTC | 2.28% |
Bunge Ltd | BG | 2.19% |
Name | Symbol | % Assets |
---|---|---|
Zoetis Inc Class A | ZTS | 8.78% |
Deere & Co | DE | 7.87% |
IDEXX Laboratories Inc | IDXX | 6.99% |
Bayer AG | BAYN.DE | 6.71% |
Nutrien Ltd | NTR.TO | 5.55% |
Corteva Inc | CTVA | 5.47% |
Archer-Daniels Midland Co | ADM | 5.03% |
Kubota Corp | 6326 | 4.30% |
Tractor Supply Co | TSCO | 3.73% |
Tyson Foods Inc Class A | TSN | 3.50% |
Name | Symbol | % Assets |
---|---|---|
Deere & Co | DE | 19.38% |
Corteva Inc | CTVA | 9.27% |
Nutrien Ltd | NTR.TO | 7.23% |
Archer-Daniels Midland Co | ADM | 5.87% |
Darling Ingredients Inc | DAR | 4.68% |
Fidelity Revere Str Tr | N/A | 4.29% |
FMC Corp | FMC | 4.20% |
Kubota Corp | 6326 | 3.93% |
CF Industries Holdings Inc | CF | 3.71% |
Lamb Weston Holdings Inc | LW | 3.31% |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |