Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
ITUP
Laxmi Prasad Interim CFO, CEO
First post to that board.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=157514016
DECN
Keith Berman
The DOJ has indicted Keith Berman, CEO of Decision Diagnostics, claiming in the indictment that he has been posting on that board under the name plutoniumimplosion.
And I was wrong!
Only to reappear a few years later to run the same type of business in China but with cigars, through a R/M with SANP, a failed mining operation. At least this time he won't be able to swindle anyone out of product.
Turns out, he made off with a whole lot of cigars.
Poor little Brucie of Hempinc
“The cut is deep for some. ”
Junior size CEO BRUCE PERLOWIN OF HEMP INCORPORATED LIKES INSULTING SHAREHOLDERS
PAIN EXPRESS"
For the non believers.
They will wish they had a piece of this company. Maybe some did at one point in time, but were shown the door, and now the stockroom of axes that had need be ground is plentiful.
The competition is wary, crumbling as they witness a new frontier laid before their eyes.
... the HEMP frontier. With LARGEST decorticator. They tremble. Weak. Fear.
Hemp Inc farmer network just keeps growing and growing.
Facts.
FLOODGATES
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=148223779
Threats: HEMP CEO BRUCE PERLOWIN and minions...lol
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147917032
OH BOY..... Wow just wow
http://www.hotstocked.com/article/91613/investors-haven-t-forgotten-santo-mining-corp.html
found this on Ihub....
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=125056102
More BAD NEWS
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=125056102
...
Here is just a portion of what your investment is folks ......unreal how someone can do this to others...but I'm hopeful FINRA WILL SEE WHATS GOING ON....CLOSE SANP DOWN FOR GOOD
..SO ITHERS DON'T GET BURNT ....
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=125056102
HHSE "CEO" Eric Parkinson used to post a lot on that board.
I have a high suspicion that he knew we were on to him and made a new alias.
I know exactly who it is.
I think it's great that CEOs post on ihub
When I was CEO of MEDS before we sold it to XON, I would post all the time
It's offensive that anyone can post talking smack about our companies but then when we defend ourselves people say that we have too much time on our hands....I guess they say the same thing about our President when he tweets?
Craig A. Huffman
Former CEO of New Green Technologies, Inc.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131938779
MorningLightMountain Member Level Tuesday, 06/06/17 10:02:19 AM
Re: Dadx4 post# 121736
Post # of 121802
http://www.otcmarkets.com/research/prohibited-attorney
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=30898880
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=51566821
Huffman apparently posting on Ihub:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=41657786
Counsel Friday, 09/18/09 09:44:55 PM
Re: the teacher post# 5125
Post # of 50050
Hello All,
Geeze, for several years now I have had your posts brought to my attention. Well not much to say right now, but with my resignation and turn over of management I get to let you know what really happened with all the distressed and supposedly distressed parties in this Company. It has been eight (8) and one half (1/2) years since we started this as a private venture, and got it to where it is now after much personal trouble for the original owners. I was advised (forever it seemed) not to reply to your board, and I did not. I suffered through two probably well meaning, but, and quote me, meaningless CEOs in interim times who said they brought something to the table and did not. Unqoute.
We were promised funding from sources that never materialized, except from the insiders own pockets, and those who believed in it, which did not go to our pockets in any excess. We were promised contracts, investment, etc. Did not occur majority of time. Only insiders brought in money to keep this afloat. I can explain later, but not on demand who took the money. Some of you posting will want to log off now for good, since I will give a good family history on what your siblings did by the way.
Well guess what... Time is up. TDBen, I know you, you know me. Teacher, you know as well. Aliangel, I think I have you centered. Morninglight, never figured your gig in this. And by the way where the hell is Paperprophet, still living in his mom's basement ? Why the hell do you listem to that guy, being a professional shorter. Paper, give me your address for service of process please. Anyway, I am still within my 90 days (meaning I am not selling or buying on public market nor do I intend to, which I have not done at all in public market since spring 2006 for the record), but will feel free to give background in messages to close the loop on a few little details which have been questioned before or may be now. This is your chance into the mind of a CEO of a startup, or in this case a reverse merger BB, so be smart about it. By the way, I will respond in stories based on facts that many of you will not like, but will NOT respond to every post made. I will give you insight, as I can, to what occurred and why, as I am allowed as outsider to NGRN, and for some time as outside counsel to Bulova Technologies Group, Inc., which by the way can be found at Bulovatechgroup.com, which you have to read completely and thoroughly, and study to know what happened here.
Best of everything to George Ring, the very best CEO you could want to replace me (I know how I was so loved) who knows all about our technologies, and to all who have been able to bring us to this step. Yes, I brought them in, but they believe as I did in what we have.
Craig A. Huffman
Former CEO of New Green Technologies, Inc.
ENTI
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131482387
Randy Hudson Thursday, 05/18/17 06:36:54 PM
Re: None
Post # of 163243
SHAREHOLDER UPDATE OF MAY 18, 2017
Greetings. I have chosen to provide ENTI's followers on InvestorsHub with an update by this method. There is certain information that I want the shareholders to learn, but during the company's ongoing, aggressive development, I don't believe a press release would best serve the company's current purposes and would be a precious waste of (out-of-pocket) monies that can be utilized elsewhere.
Firstly, The Hudson and Grande Organization no longer exists and hasn't for over two years. Mike has "called it a day" on his involvement in public companies (at least, ours), and, moreover, H & G, as a constructive, fictitious entity, no longer owns any controlling interest in any public company.
Due to [yet] another uncompleted transaction, I repurchased ENTI's control preferred stock under a stock purchase agreement that became effective on February 20, 2017. (I have never owned any common stock in ENTI, which is not to say that in future I won't, I just haven't owned any (nor did EMSR, First Hudson Trust, and Mike) in prior periods.) Furthermore, contrary to public opinion and unfounded speculation, Mike and I were not affiliated with any person/entity that owned any significant number of shares of common stock, except regular shareholders, and we NEVER received any part of any person's or entity's stock purchase or sale. More importantly, Mike and I NEVER caused the issuance of any common stock in Encounter to anyone. Some shares were promised to certain people that aided the company, but the certificates were never delivered due to several reasons. In this case, if the shares were issued to those people, the number of shares wouldn't have amounted to much; not certainly with the exorbitant number of shares the company has issued prior to 2012.)
There is much to be done to address ENTI's administrative and business concerns. The first step toward accomplishing one or more of these tasks is to disclose all the company's activities from the month and year of its last filing to date with the SEC (March 22, 2001). This will be accomplished soon by the company's filing of a current report on Form 8-K with the SEC. This cumulative report will contain detailed information for the public on the state of the company.
The good news is that as the result of the culmination of all of my disclosure actions is that, the shareholders of the company will be told and know - by fact, not speculation - what's been going on with the company. My guess is that, to some shareholders, to learn the information will be gratifying; to most shareholders, the disclosures will be unpleasant; and, to other shareholders, some of the news in describing the near-term and long-term development will be seemingly intolerable and, yet, another ploy to pacify the shareholders by Encounter's senior executive management.
In addition to the Form 8-K Current Report, I will be filing a Schedule 13D with the SEC in the coming business days. (For those who don't possess it, Encounter's central index key at the SEC is 0001109697.) That 13D schedule requires me to disclose my plans for the company's business and operations. The rules governing that form filing also require indicating other items of material concern to shareholders; matters like reverse splits and recapitalizations. Yes, to put an end to speculation, there will be a reverse split of the company's common stock in the near-term. The record date will be set forth in the 8-K and 13D. There's one thing about a reverse split that everyone seems to overlook - the value of any shareholders' total holdings will not change: As an example, 1 share after the split down would be worth the value of 1,000 shares before the record date. (Do not misconstrue the example to mean the reverse stock split ratio; that's not the ratio, just and example.) There simply wouldn't be a large number of shares to trade. The company will never realize any significant per share value of its stock if there are billions of shares outstanding. But the company's stock might realize a decent per share value if there are tens of millions of shares outstanding, especially, if the company is conducting a bona fide business. In furtherance of that point, there will be some dilution to the post-reversal holders of the company's stock. The company intends to register its securities and, by doing so, will also conduct a limited offering of shares (under Regulation A or on Form S-1) to fund its legitimate, cash-generating business going forward. The company's then shareholders may expect a dilution of, perhaps, up to 25% of their holdings; however, the final determination will be disclosed in the 8-K and/or 13D. Please, don't read into this because you will only be speculating on facts you don't have based on information you don't know.
Moving forward there will be established three newly-formed subsidiaries. The first will serve to consult attorneys and others in business matters. The second will serve to engage in the pharmaceutical business (compliant under U. S. Federal and various state's laws). The third subsidiary will own multifamily residential and commercial properties.
There is a reason the federal government designates certain information as "non-public". On an earlier occasion, I disclosed information to the shareholders for this or another public company I headed up. The shareholders so antagonized the sellers of the target property, the deal didn't go through and I was perceived to be hoodlum, of sorts. (I have since learned from that mistake.) In fact, many of those persons are the very shareholders who have and continue to criticize the company's senior executive management, much of the time, without knowing all the facts.
There will be a discussion in the 8-K regarding litigation. Encounter will either be instigating the litigation or defending itself as the result of most transactions that originated in and prior to 2012 (which were, pretty much, speculative, at best). In three cases, there were public companies that Encounter's former senior executive management was dealing with to no avail. However, those transactions may have been misconstrued by shareholders, as the shareholders' continuing investments did not produce the results intended by the company's former management (third-party company stock dividends, asset transfers, etc.).
In terms of the company's administration, there are several material issues that must be addressed with our stock transfer agent, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation ("DTCC"), the National Securities Clearing Corporation ("NSCC"), and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"). Due to the direct actions by the company's senior executive management in and prior to 2012, Encounter has a DTC Chill imposed against its securities. Moreover, the company did not comply with the rules and regulations that required the company to notify FINRA of certain actions and/or events prior to their occurrence. I am working to resolve these issues; however, in honesty, I cannot speculate on the outcome. All these issues existed months and years before I joined the company. Regrettably, our stock transfer agent, Pacific Stock Transfer, must observe federal and state guidelines and, therefore, must observe the impositions on the company's securities until those matters are resolved. I am hopeful that Pacific will continue to work with me, if for nothing more, than to service the company's shareholders.
Encounter will be introducing a new website in the next month. Now, I have established several accounts on various social media sites. Please, don't everyone rush to their phones or computers. I am providing the contact information as a courtesy, but there is no employee to answer your Tweets, e-mails, or posts for another month.
At Twitter, Encounter is @enticolorado (Encounter Tech); at Pinterest, Encounter is Encounter Tech; at Facebook, Encounter is @enticolorado (Encounter Tech); and at Gmail and Google+, Encounter is eticolorado@gmail.com. Again, there's nobody available to reply to your e-mails, posts, or Tweets just yet, so don't rag on me or the company on InvestorsHub or elsewhere if you don't get an answer for a month.
The company also signed-up for a mailing address in Las Vegas. This address is temporary and will be replaced by an actual office the company is in the process of selecting. The move-in is still at least two months away. (The company's address and other information, for the most part, is current on the Link ATS (that is, Link Alternative Trading System, owned and operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc., for those who are unfamiliar with that designation) site for Encounter's profile.)
I am making every effort to make the company's stock become more valuable for all shareholders but, particularly, for those shareholders who have held on to the company's shares for so many years and who then really believed in the company's senior executive management's statements and announcements in and prior to 2012.
I will always accept any shareholder's call, time and hour permitting. I ask that you allow me another few weeks before you start calling, as all the information you have been and are requesting will be disclosed in the 8-K and 13D.
Let's not allow unfounded speculation to govern the relationships between Encounter and its shareholders. There are rules the company must abide by in terms of disclosing accurate historical and current information to its shareholders and the public. It and I are subject to strict anti-fraud provisions of federal and state's securities laws. Let's all be aware of those rules and not jump to conclusions when the company doesn't or won't release public information that its shareholders want to be divulged right away. At times, the company cannot obligate itself to release certain information. Let's start anew and Encounter Today™.
Respectfully,
Randy Hudson
Chairman and President
STATEMENTS FOR OUR PROTECTION AND YOURS. NOTICE OF FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY. This writing contains certain statements that may suggest the existence of certain risks and uncertainties expressed through the language used by Randy Hudson or Encounter to favorably describe Encounter's future proposed transactions, and the anticipated results therefrom. Some of these statements may be interpreted to mean that Hudson or Encounter are trying to induce you to believe them, respectively. Don't let yourselves be deceived. Encounter's shareholders may be subject to numerous unidentified adverse risks related to the company's plan of operations stated in this announcement, which, in some cases, may be concealed by Hudson's or Encounter's use of these certain and ambiguous phrases or terms. These statements may relate to Encounter's stated future actions, objectives, expectations, and intentions regarding its plan of operations and results therefrom, if any. Hudson's and Encounter's use of words such as "contemplate", "anticipate", "intend", "plan", "propose", "may", "could", and similar terms and expressions may identify these statements. The actual consequences of Encounter's future performance could differ materially from those stated herein. Factors that could contribute to these differences include those stated herein with the types of phrases and terms referred to above are sometimes referred to as "forward-looking" statements. PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY. SEEK THE ASSISTANCE OF A LICENSED STOCKBROKER OR LICENSED FINANCIAL PROFESSIONAL, ATTORNEY, OR ACCOUNTANT. DO NOT INVEST IN ENCOUNTER'S SECURITIES UNLESS YOU ARE PREPARED TO LOSE YOUR ENTIRE INVESTMENT. THE COMPANY HAS A HISTORY OF REPETITIVE LOSSES AND THE NON-PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS TO ITS SHAREHOLDERS.
Urbt
Lucky,mydog Member Level Thursday, 04/27/17 02:56:33 PM
Re: integral post# 120690
Post # of 120722
this is joseph collins. also ceo of urbt.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Urban-Television-Network-Corp-URBT-5007/
he also posts as.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=380758
Please keep updating this board
whenever a new CEO poster is discovered. When a CEO takes time out of his busy day of building value for shareholders and comes to iHub to update his/her loyal shareholders, that type of effort should be appropriately recognized.
Please keep updating this board
whenever a new CEO poster is discovered. When a CEO takes time out of his busy day of building value for shareholders and comes to iHub to update his/her loyal shareholders, that type of effort should be appropriately recognized.
He opens and closes
with lines only pathological liars would use.
"if this were a scam, why would I...."
"truth is on our side"
YIPI's little CEO Tiny Richard Granville CONtinues to post on the iHub YIPI site - defending himself about a photo with Glenn Beck from 2011!
Too funny!
RichGranville
Friday, 10/28/16 05:20:02 AM
Re: A deleted message
Post # 51540 of 51549
Shareholders,
I'll be brief.
1) If I was to Photoshop myself with someone, Glenn Beck would not be my first choice. This is a ridiculous accusation.
2) Receivables - Yippy sells a appliance for POC (Proof of Concept), which takes 60-180 days to complete after box install. Then we give the customers Net 60 to pay once it is accepted. Our revenues reflect the price of the appliance, with services and/or the development billed separately. We don't do anything different than the majors, who bill exactly like we do here at Yippy.
3) Globalstar and Yippy are meeting November 4th in Atlanta to inspect our new command center which is now up to ISO standards. We'll be making a full announcement about this shortly.
4) As for MC+A and Snyder, Westerman LLP is handling both of these issues.
Yippy will prevail as always. Truth is always on our side.
take care...
rich
404-769-0982
rich@yippyinc.com
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126120473
RichGranville
Friday, 10/28/16 05:32:24 AM
Re: RichGranville post# 51540
Post # 51542 of 51549
-----Original Message-----
From: rich@yippyinc.com
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 10:30am
To: "Jessica Durbin" <jessica@theblaze.com>
Subject: Re: Triple checking with you ...
Planning to be there around 12:45-1pm.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jessica Durbin" <jessica@theblaze.com>
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2011 10:16am
To: "rich@yippyinc.com" <rich@yippyinc.com>
Subject: Re: Triple checking with you ...
Hi Rich,
I'm looking forward to seeing you today. Are you still available? I will also put you on the guest list for the show today if you can make it. I will go with you if you don't have company. Let me know.
We have a sales meeting that runs a little long. 12:30 works best.
Jessica
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 1, 2011, at 7:14 PM, rich@yippyinc.com wrote:
Hi Jessica,
I thought you would be happy. Lunch sounds great ! I'll show up between 12-12:30 on Monday and we can just play it by ear. That is a most kind offer to watch the show and I would be honored to do so.
See you soon !
rich
404-769-0982
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jessica Durbin" <jessica@theblaze.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 6:35pm
To: rich@yippyinc.com
Subject: Re: Triple checking with you ...
Oh that is TERRIFIC!!!! Then we HAVE to go to lunch! Plus, Glenn doesn't hang around on Friday's and if he is around on Monday, I prefer you get an opportunity to say hello. Can you also be my guest for his 5pm show on GBTV?
I know you probably have lots scheduled but that would be great. He tapes his Friday show on Thursday and sometimes we have other people do his show live on Fridays.
Jessica
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126120522
RichGranville
Friday, 10/28/16 05:34:53 AM
Re: shajandr post# 51541
Post # 51543 of 51549
Just like it said, Truth is always on the side of Yippy.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126120532
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126120591
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126120698
I'm much more pc than you. ( :
"Swarmy little worm" is as brutal as I get.
You're much kinder to him than i would be.
A typical pennystock bigshot
"CEO" of an imaginary business but a very real papermill
SANP Frank Yglesias. Or Fran Jose if you prefer.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=528458
He's a swarmy little worm as you may be able to tell by his profile pic. If not, then what he pulled with CAGR would certainly convince you.
He was CEO of GDHI, a failed business, when he talked a simple minded winery owner from California into expanding to China using his failed ticker. The winery owner obviously didn't do his DD on the pinks or Frankie.
Eventually, Frankie stole the wine and closed shop.
Only to reappear a few years later to run the same type of business in China but with cigars, through a R/M with SANP, a failed mining operation. At least this time he won't be able to swindle anyone out of product. But he'll swindle everyone else, you can count on it.
Glenn Bradley Laken, CEO of CMGO, which spun off GMER into HDSI shell.
Here are some of his previous antics:
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2000-06-15/business/0006150225_1_stock-fraud-wire-fraud-kickbacks
He posts under a pseudonym to disguise his identity.
HOW WAS THIS CONFIRMED IF YOU DON'T MIND? DID MARK TELL YOU OR CALL YOU?
It was confirmed that it was our SFOR CEO. I have posted his email replies many times and he only ever posted on I hub twice since 2011. I knew right when he posted it was him and now we also have confirmation. I am glad he posted for everyone to see. The manipulators today who posted fake news about a RS should go to jail!
SFOR CEO
thefacts1 Wednesday, 08/03/16 04:55:25 PM
Re: None
Post # of 69265
Let me be clear, I am the CEO of StrikeForce and we have a strong capital position, no convertibles out there to be traded and NO reverse split in the future. Anything else about this is NOT TRUE!!
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124296379
VGID VGroup
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=122536573
Buzzy1030 Tuesday, 05/10/16 02:36:12 PM
Re: None
Post # of 13499
Buzz Twombly <buzz.twombly@gmail.com>
11:07 AM (27 minutes ago)
to Jason
Jason,
Were you able to get a hold of anyone at Finra yesterday?
You said you were going to call them and get right back to me. Please do so. My shareholders are in an uproar.
Larry Twombly
This is an example of a daily correspondence with the TA.
dick_schmidt RVPL
rvplus
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=121440518
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2016/comp-pr2016-53.pdf
V. PETERSON’S PSEUDONYMOUS POSTS ON INVESTORSHUB.COM
146. InvestorsHub.com, a website, describes itself as a “forum for serious investors to gather and share market insights in a dynamic environment using an advanced discussion platform” (emphasis in original).
147. In 2012 and 2013, InvestorsHub.com hosted a message board dedicated to RVPlus (the “Message Board”).
148. From October 7, 2012 through July 30, 2013, Peterson made at least 127 posts on the Message Board. Each time, Peterson used the screen name “dick_schmidt.”
149. In his posts, Peterson claimed to “live in Boston” and to be an RVPlus shareholder who was buying RVPlus shares in the public market and holding the shares because of their value.
150. Peterson’s posts routinely touted RVPlus’s stock.
151. For example, on October 10, 2012, RVPlus’s stock opened at $0.40 per share.
152. That day, as described in paragraph 98 above, Peterson emailed the Nigerian government to inform it that ECCO2 would delay delivering on its promises of providing goods and services under the Nigerian Memorandum.
153. The same day, Peterson posted on the Message Board. He claimed that the value of the Purported Nigerian Agreement made RVPlus stock worth “over $10 a share 1:1. Even only counting first year’s contract revenue it should be over $2 a share. Way under valued [sic].”
154. Five days later, on October 15, 2012, RVPlus’s stock again opened at $0.40 per share.
155. The next day, Peterson again posted on the Message Board. He forecasted: “@ RVPL $1 share price by next month. I agree. Probably higher.”
156. When investors expressed concerns about RVPlus or its stock, Peterson repeatedly posted messages suggesting that certain false statements in RVPlus’s filings and press releases must be true.
157. For example, when investors voiced concerns about the validity of RVPlus’s financial statements, Peterson claimed that “Fed filings don’t lie” and advised other shareholders: “I would buy up as much as possible.”
158. On July 19, 2013, soon after the Commission issued an order suspending trading in RVPlus’s securities, Peterson posted that “the CEO and company can file the necessary forms needed to be back on track around the same time they are filing their 10k so not a total loss.... They could file everything and be back to trading by this time next month.”
159. In a later post on the same day, Peterson posted that “[f]alsifying $17 mill on books and $1.9b in contracts would be suicide.”
160. On July 24, 2013, Peterson continued to defend RVPlus’s purported agreements and financials. He posted: “8K Contracts are extremely valid. Each 8K contract was with a federal government agency. Each party in contract is either a affiliate [sic] of UN or some Ministry or something or office of Foreign affairs…. If they contracts [sic] were bogus the CEO would have detained the CEO or whoever was responsible for faking something this extreme…. Let’s use our common sense here.”
solidus370 - BVAP & TAUG
Profile for solidus370
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=231947
CEO of YIPI Richard Granville
Profile for RichGranville
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=441877
Sadly, he probably doesn't rank in the top ten pinky CEO criminals around here. But he's certainly garnered the attention he so desperately craves.
Good info. Thanks!
Do recently forced to resign CEOs count?
Martin Shkreli late of KBIO
Profile for martinshkreli
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profilea.aspx?user=518417
AIDS-drug gouger Martin Shkreli arrested on charges of securities fraud | Daily Mail Online
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3364028/World-s-hated-man-Martin-Shkreli-arrested-charges-securities-fraud.html
I seriously doubt it,
I first (and last) ran into him on RB (identical handle anyway) 16/17 years ago, We were both suck in the same pos when I discovered he owned some kind of tech store in my hometown, I actually called him there and came real close to stopping by and saying hello.
He seemed like a pretty straight up guy, just a pissed off pinky player mad at himself for getting sucked into scams one too many times.
I haven't communicated with him since, so who knows?
I DONT CARE WHO YOU ARE ! SEEING YOUR NON EXISTENT REVENUES AND DILUTION IS ALL I NEED TO SEE. THIS IS PUREEEEE ENTERTAINMENT FOR ME ALSO. NOW TRY AND MAKE YOUR PIG FLY, MAYBE FEEDING IT SOME POT WILL HELP OR MAYBE NOT!
Is your caps lock key stuck? Just curious.
SO YOU'RE NOTHING MORE THEN A OTCQB! CALL US IF YOU EVER REACH NASDAQ!
TRY ANSWERING WHY YOU'RE STILL LISTED GREY MARKET!
Read the comments. There's also another SeekingAlpha article written by a CFA, but you didn't bother posting that one.
So Transparent the OTC is looking for you! http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/INDR/profile From a writer on Alpha
Don't Buy Indoor Harvest Corp., This Week's Most Promoted Penny Stock
Apr. 23, 2015 3:19 PM ET | About: Indoor Harvest Corp. (INQD)
Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. (More...)
Summary
•Indoor Harvest Corp. generates $0 in revenue and has less than $700K in assets, but still has a market cap of approximately $9M.
•Chad Sykes, Founder and CEO of Indoor Harvest Corp., owns 56.4% of the common stock.
•According to StockPromoters.com, INQD is the most promoted penny stock over the last 5 days. $35,000 was spent in April on promotion.
•The company's original S-1 says, "There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern".
•Direction: Investors should stay away and experienced traders should look for strategic short entries.
Share this article with a colleague
Check out our Facebook page while you are at it.
I have blogged about our Company every step of the way since I started it in my garage.
http://www.facebook.com/indoorharvest
Ihub is a great way to communicate with investors. Just because some CEO's use it for nefarious reasons, doesn't mean every CEO does.
We're probably one of the most transparent Companies on the OTC today. Even a CFA on seekingalpha thought the same.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/2962186-indoor-harvest-corporation-begins-trading-a-stock-to-watch
We're also conducting an actual Title II crowdfunding effort. Fully, 100% transparent. I challenge you to find a more transparent Company.
http://indoorharvest.investorroom.com/2015-08-20-Indoor-Harvest-Corp-Retains-Broker-Dealer-WealthForge
ccsykes : INQD
http://investorshub.advfn.com/Indoor-Harvest-Corp-INQD-29446/
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=117449113
ccsykes Member Level Saturday, 10/03/15 01:47:05 PM
Re: Ben Lurkin post# 96409
Post # of 96622
I'm CEO of Indoor Harvest.
Quote:Thayer O'Neal is a spin-off of LL Bradford & Company who was shut down by the PCAOB in April for numerous violations where THayer was a Partner.
Quote:Coincidentally they all had something in common. They were pinkies that have never made a dime in their lives.
We're not a pinky, we conducted an actual SPO and we were using Mickey Oneal as our auditor. Indoor Harvest was the first issuer to clear the SEC with cannabis risk disclosures on a selling shareholder S-1. We were put through a 10 month, almost borderline hostile review. We actually had to raise additional capital mid-review because the SEC was dragging things out.
We were the first Company in decades to be allowed to go effect by operation of law rather than a notice of effectiveness. We made the effort to do things right despite the SEC's efforts to make it difficult. So being lumped in with a "pinky" does stick in my craw some.
I simply wanted an auditor that was fair in price and Mickey offered that when I originally went shopping for an auditor. I had no relationship prior.
A principal at LL Bradford screwed up, no doubt there. Mickey wasn't a partner or involved in any of the wrong doing. He was simply one of the audit managers. LL Bradford was then acquired by RBSM after the SEC shut them down. Shortly after, Mickey and Thayer left RBSM and started their own firm.
I can't speak for the other Companies, but I simply enjoy working with Mickey. Anyone experienced working with an auditor understands that it takes a few years to get a smooth system down. Changing auditors can be a real headache for a small company. Mickey asked if I wanted to follow him over to his new firm and I said yes. He's a fair, affordable auditor.
So no, Thayer & Oneal are NOT a spin off of LL Bradford. They were not associated with the misdeeds of the sanctioned principal, if they were, they wouldn't still be auditors.
I've used Ihub for a long time. It's been a great research tool. However, for every scam that has been uncovered by Ihub sleuths, there are those who defame people simply for innocent association. I know, I've been lumped into that category more than once despite having been a force for change.
So yeah, I came across this post because about once a week, I'll do an Ihub search to see if anyone is talking about our Company. I rarely ever post, but I felt this needed a response.
You can judge each of the companies on their merits, that's completely fair. I've obviously opened myself up to such scrutiny simply posting in this forum. I'm confident I can stand up to such scrutiny. However, defaming people is uncool. Especially when you don't appear to have all the facts.
If there is anything I have learned working in and around the OTC, the truth is not always as it seems. Naive CEO's get suckered into bad deals, take all the blame when it falls apart, while the sharks continue to swim and make more victims. Yes, it's still the fault of the CEO, but rarely do they always deserve the defamation.
CEN Biotech, lol.. well that one is pretty obvious what it is. So no arguments there.
At the end of the Day, did Thayer get sanctioned? No. The guilty were sanctioned.
We just announced that the largest cannabis producer in Canada is going to use our technology. We've developed a very disruptive technology with proven data. There's value in that.
Warm Regards,
Chad Sykes
Followers
|
21
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
114
|
Created
|
02/24/12
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderator stockmasterflash | |||
Assistants |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |
Subscribe to Ad free and enjoy an ad-free experience
Try Now
Keep the Ads