Bourque Industries Inc (BORK)

[Spartanfan1]

Another day… another negative thought

[gotmilk]

John Bourque's Board of Director Puppets negatively impact the availability of sources that can bring Bourque Industries towards success.

Simply put, John Bourque will not allow available means that can bring Kryron products to market, as that will remove John Bourque's share holding majority.

Thus, John Bourque's Board of Director Puppets march to the drum of John Bourque rather than their required legal duties.

[Spartanfan1]

That makes no sense

[gotmilk]

How long do we let John Bourque's Board of Director Puppets negatively impact our lives?

Answer: Until Bourque Industries goes banruptcy.

Which is on track to happen this year.

[Spartanfan1]

How long do we let others negatively impact our lives? It’s a serious question- ten years ain’t healthy

[gotmilk]

Yes, 10+ years is a long time for the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders waiting, so far unsuccessfully, for Bourque Industries (a.k.a John Bourque) to communicate with them. It's a point that they would welcome news, good or bad, to conclude the stench of a 10+ year fart John Bourque has released so far.

[Spartanfan1]

10 years!!!!! That’s quite a long time, isn’t it?

[gotmilk]

For the past 10 years Bourque Industries has fulfilled a ludicrous doomsday prediction for it's Kryron.

[Spartanfan1]

Even so- ludicrous doomsday predictions of a .0001 pps by the end of the year are clinically insane

There are plenty of other expert market otc tickers to assign that prophecy to- not this one

[gotmilk]

The trend of 10+ years is not our friend.

[Spartanfan1]

Time will tell in January of 2023. Trust me- I’ll revisit this and we’ll see who is right

I’ll be ready for a good laugh at time sensitive pps predictions… yet again

[gotmilk]

Newsflash… pink current BORK’s pps is going to be .0001 or bankrupt by 12/31/22

Why?

Bourque Industries has nothing active (in the works) to sell it's Kryron.

The only thing active is John Bourque's perverted spoken words.

[Spartanfan1]

Another time dated prediction… we’ve been down this road before with very poor results.

Newsflash… pink current BORK’s pps is not going to be 0001 or bankrupt by 12/31/22

I’ll remember to check back with this prediction in January of 2023 to discuss this matter

[gotmilk]

What A Difference A Day Makes

John Bourque is a con man, so it's expected that one having a conversation with this swindler would find the talk to be informative, enjoyable, and satisfying.

But one can ask, day after day for 10+ years nothing but failure for Bourque Industries.

[MerthyrQ]

Well, as one who had a hour long conversation with John Bourque about six weeks ago. I inform you all that I have nothing negative to say as a result of my visit with John. It was a pleasant conversation which was informative, enjoyable, and satisfying.

[gotmilk]

"always been someone to give a positive view"

Those that did so, having direct contact with John Bourque, can only post negative comments like "The latest attempt by Bourque Industries to obtain the cash that is required by John Bourque to put into play a means that keeps John Bourque's total control of Bourque Industries in place, has failed."

The John Bourque's Board of Director Puppets continues to allow John Bourque to keep Bourque Industries hostage, preventing available means that can move this company forward towards success.

BORK's pps will move towards $0.0001 or bankruptcy by the end of this year.

doug

[KZMike]

Good Info. . . Thanks helps me 'catch up'.

"Their [They are] looking to hire a new attorney". . . WHY?. . . did they fire the current or did the attorney leave as a result of a weak case?

I AM surprised at the lack of activity/posts here. . . OR maybe NOT. Have the pumpers seem to have lost their appetite in trading BORK shares???

This lull is a bit confusing as there has always been someone to give a positive view on even the most dower sequence of events. . .??? Maybe this lull is the predictor of the END? Not sure what the end would look like

Regards,

KZMike

[mdb1]

and .. i believe in Santa Claus BORK shareholders

[gotmilk]

Who’s JB - Johnny Cryron

[gotmilk]

More to come [a] twist to the [Bourque Industries] story - gutless & gloryless

John Bourque has the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders twisting in the wind.

[MerthyrQ]

and ... i believe in Santa Claus .

Interesting, very interesting. Thank you for telling us.

[mdb1]

and ... i believe in Santa Claus ...

[MerthyrQ]

It is possible the stock can zoom up again with good news and progress.

[mdb1]

stock zoomed to $.25 :right before JB went to jail (last time)

[gotmilk]

"time already came" Yes, I agree that John Bourque had many instances of times to make Bourque Industries successful, but failed each time.

[MerthyrQ]

Some might say that the time already came to do what Flo-Jo did better than anyone else.

[gotmilk]

"... it's a great read for sure."

When the day arrives that a conclusion to the Bourque Industries saga is known, be it bankruptcy or success, then a non-fiction book can be written.

I suggest a title: The Darken Soul of a New Metal Alloying Process

Reference: The Soul of a New Machine (The company practiced the Mushroom Theory of Management – "Keeping the employees in the dark, feeding them shit, and watch them accomplish the task to make the company successful.")

John Bourque, on the other hand, practiced the "Mushroom Theory of a Public Company" – "Keeping the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders of Bourque Industries in the dark, feeding them shit and watch them curse the day they became shareholders as year after year heap obscenities upon John Bourque"

[blastin]

I'm not sure why no due diligence was done on JB or CJ during the initial stages of this transaction. A quick google search would on either one would of shown the lack of character and the fraud associated with them from past dealings. It wasn't like this was for a few thousand dollars this was for millions. I'll keep you updated as the case moves along it's a great read for sure.

[gotmilk]

Correction: FALSE "Also seems like John Bourque and Carol J. Condon will both do prison time."

So now it really is all about money. (see below)

John Bourque and Carol Condon need cash for lawyers. But if they lose the civil action against them, then the money they must pay to the plaintiff will be atrocious (... when the entire transaction was rejected, no money was refunded to Plaintiff, leaving her liable for millions of dollars to the buyer of the goods.)

Guess this will put a fire under John Bourque and Carol Condon to make a deal they choose not to in the past to have Bourque Industries become successful. (i.e. John Bourque would have to relinquish his majority share holdings.)

1. This is a civil action for fraud and racketeering activities, breach of contract, conversion, and unfair business practices.

What Is the Difference Between Criminal Law and Civil Law?
https://www.britannica.com/story/what-is-the-difference-between-criminal-law-and-civil-law
Criminal law deals with behavior that is or can be construed as an offense against the public, society, or the state—even if the immediate victim is an individual.
Civil law deals with behavior that constitutes an injury to an individual or other private party, such as a corporation.
Criminal law and civil law differ with respect to how cases are initiated (who may bring charges or file suit), how cases are decided (by a judge or a jury), what kinds of punishment or penalty may be imposed, what standards of proof must be met, and what legal protections may be available to the defendant.
In criminal cases only the federal or a state government (the prosecution) may initiate a case...
In civil cases cases are initiated (suits are filed) by a private party (the plaintiff); cases are usually decided by a judge...
... punishment almost always consists of a monetary award and never consists of imprisonment

[titan2902]

Explain those Tom Clancy delusions JB.

[titan2902]

Been saying what a lunatic this guy has been for years. Seriously corporate espionage, fleeing to Taiwan and being dealt with. He’s so delusional he thinks people will actually believe his crazy lies. Such a loser.

Guy can’t even deliver masks and some of you on here think he’s going to big things and make great armor and other nonsense. Don’t be delusional like that drunken fool.



34. When Defendant Redstone submitted the claimed SGS report to SGS
for verification, Defendant Redstone was informed by SGS that the report was
fraudulent.
35. In response to inquiries by Defendant Redstone, Defendant Bourque
represented that the SGS team was under a 14-day quarantine and not been able to
upload their report to SGS’ computer system. Defendant Bourque represented that
the issue had been raised at the highest level of the Chinse government and that
confirmation would be received from SGS that their initial information was
inaccurate. The confirmation was never provided to Defendant Redstone or
Plaintiff Boss. Instead, Defendant Bourque claimed that an SGS team member had
engaged in corporate espionage, been taken by the Chinse military while trying to
flee to Taiwan, and was being “dealt with.” All these representations and claims
were false, and Defendant Bourque knew them to be false when he made them.

[gotmilk]

Thank you, I need to reread what you posted and make a flow chart to track where the $6,688,000 (6 million 688 thousand dollars) originated from and where it traveled. For sure counterfeit goods made, are by law, need to be destroyed, so everything here is about the money.

Seems like John Bourque and Carol J. Condon acted totally stupid in 2020 to obtain "easy" money.

Also seems like John Bourque and Carol J. Condon will both do prison time, meaning unless John Bourque transfers
all of the Bourque Industries Kryron secrets he illegally moved from Bourque Industries to exist solely within his possession, then Bourque Industries can not move towards success.

Reference:
1. This is a civil action for fraud and racketeering activities, breach of contract, conversion, and unfair business practices.
4. Plaintiff’s damages far exceed $75,000.
6. Plaintiff further alleges that the counterfeit goods were imported into California by certain of the Defendants and from there were transported by said same Defendants across state lines to the buyer.

The official Bourque Industries t-shirt.


Doug

[blastin]

BACKGROUND FACTS
24. In April 2020, Plaintiff was authorized by the State of
Arkansas/University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) to act as its
representative to acquire certain personal protective equipment, namely 3M
Company produced masks in quantities of one and two million.
25. Plaintiff Boss sought the assistance of Defendant McKown and/or
Defendant McKown P.A. and the escrow services of Defendant Redstone, to
handle the transaction and funds transfers. To allow Defendant Redstone to easily
assist in the transaction, UAMS also authorized Defendant Redstone to “source,
and secure ongoing [3M N95 1860 masks] on our behalf.”
Case 8:20-cv-01897-MEMF-KES Document 1 Filed 10/01/20 Page 6 of 22 Page ID #:6

COMPLAINT
PAGE 7
26. Initially, Defendant McKown and/or Defendant McKown P.A. set up
an escrow, appointing his law firm, Navarro McKown, as escrow agent, to hold
$6,688,000 of funds transferred from the buyer, UAMS, for a purchase from a
seller known as Phoenix Endoscopy Products, located in Florida. On April 24,
2020, Plaintiff wired the $6,688,000 in funds she had received from UAMS to the
escrow held on account by Navarro McKown. Unfortunately, that deal fell
through.
27. In June 2020, Defendant Bourque represented to Defendant Redstone
that Defendant Bourque’s company, Defendant Terminator, had secured exclusive
production rights from a manufacturer licensed by the 3M Company of Minnesota.
28. Defendant Bourque represented that the production rights were for
3M-brand masks and the manufacturer had said masks ready for shipment at a
Chinese state-owned facility approximately two hours south of Shanghai.
29. Defendant Redstone informed Defendant Bourque that it had a buyer
(Plaintiff Boss), but there was concern that the products were not genuine, but
Defendant Bourque represented that Defendant Terminator had paid for an
inspection team (an SGS team) to travel, lodge, and conduct an inspection of the
facility.
30. Defendant Bourque suggested commencing with an initial run of one
million units and, if performance was satisfactory, the quantity could be increased
to 20 to 40 million units per week on transport controlled by Defendant Bourque.
31. After some time had passed, Defendant Bourque represented that the
SGS team had inspected the entire facility and provided a report that Defendant
Bourque claimed confirmed that the state-owned manufacturer was an authorized
3M Company distributor.
32. Defendant Bourque provided to Defendant Redstone a video of the
product, but review of the video showed at least some product was expired.
33. In response to Defendant Redstone’s discovery, Defendant Bourque
Case 8:20-cv-01897-MEMF-KES Document 1 Filed 10/01/20 Page 7 of 22 Page ID #:7

COMPLAINT
PAGE 8
further represented that the masks delivered would not be expired.
34. When Defendant Redstone submitted the claimed SGS report to SGS
for verification, Defendant Redstone was informed by SGS that the report was
fraudulent.
35. In response to inquiries by Defendant Redstone, Defendant Bourque
represented that the SGS team was under a 14-day quarantine and not been able to
upload their report to SGS’ computer system. Defendant Bourque represented that
the issue had been raised at the highest level of the Chinse government and that
confirmation would be received from SGS that their initial information was
inaccurate. The confirmation was never provided to Defendant Redstone or
Plaintiff Boss. Instead, Defendant Bourque claimed that an SGS team member had
engaged in corporate espionage, been taken by the Chinse military while trying to
flee to Taiwan, and was being “dealt with.” All these representations and claims
were false, and Defendant Bourque knew them to be false when he made them.
36. Defendant Bourque next advised Defendant Redstone that another
exclusive relationship had been secured, this time with a Thai company,
Timbermate, that was licensed by the 3M Company. Defendant Bourque provided
a copy of a purported 3M Company distributor certificate and a video and
photographs of the purported products showing all units in 3M cartons displaying
“made in Thailand” with matching lot numbers. Defendant Bourque represented
that, to make its weekly production of 10 million units, Defendant Terminator had
to sell another 1 million units already produced and available for immediate
purchase and delivery.
37. Defendant Bourque was informed by Defendant Redstone that the
information, certificate, photographs, and videos were being provided to Plaintiff
Boss, who would be relying on this proof in making an agreement to purchase the
3M Company products sourced from Thailand.
38. Defendant Bourque represented to Defendant Redstone that
Case 8:20-cv-01897-MEMF-KES Document 1 Filed 10/01/20 Page 8 of 22 Page ID #:8

COMPLAINT
PAGE 9
immediate action was required to secure the long-term contract, that there was
insufficient time to conduct an SGS onsite inspection, and that an SGS inspection
could be conducted after the product arrived in the United States. Defendant
Bourque stated he would guarantee the authenticity of the product.
39. The deadline set for Plaintiff Boss to accept the contract was June 23,
2020, 11:00 a.m. PST, by which time Plaintiff Boss had to wire funds to Defendant
Terminator to secure the 1 million lot.
40. Defendant Bourque represented that the product would ship
immediately after funds had cleared.
41. At the recommendation of Defendant McKown and/or Defendant
McKown P.A., the transaction was set up as a purchase of goods between
Defendant Redstone, as seller, and Plaintiff, as buyer. The purchase agreement was
signed on June 23, 2020.
42. On June 23, 2020, Plaintiff Boss wired $2 million directly to
Defendant Terminator in compliance with the terms of the June 22 purchase
agreement.
43. On June 23, 3030, Plaintiff Boss also transferred a total of $400,000
to Defendant McKown P.A. in two installments: $40,000 and $360,000. The
purpose of these deposits was to pay commissions for the acquisition from
Defendant Terminator of the personal protective equipment products ordered by
UAMS. Defendant McKown subsequently had these commission funds transferred
to an account at Defendant Ohana based on other potential purchases, but then
returned them to his IOLTA trust account.
44. Defendant Bourque acknowledged receipt of funds, but stated that
Plaintiff Boss had “just missed” the 11:00 a.m. deadline, and as a result there
would be a delay in clearing the funds. This delay continued for days.
45. On Friday, June 26, 2020, Defendant Bourque claimed that the funds
had finally cleared, and shipping would commence the following week with initial
Case 8:20-cv-01897-MEMF-KES Document 1 Filed 10/01/20 Page 9 of 22 Page ID #:9

COMPLAINT
PAGE 10
delivery to the Bangkok Airport. Up to that time, Defendant Bourque had given
various explanations for the delay, including a typographical error in the wire
transmittal causing it to be rejected.
46. The following week, Defendant Bourque failed to provide an airway
bill or other proof of transport, but claimed the 1 million units had been loaded and
sent to Bangkok. However, he then claimed all cargo shipments of protective
personal equipment from Bangkok to the United States had been temporarily
suspended and the shipment had to be diverted to Hong Kong.
47. Plaintiff Boss and Defendant Redstone made repeated demands for
proof of shipment documentation. On July 8, 2020, Defendant Bourque provided
them with photographs of a transportation contract, claiming he had incurred
additional expense to ship the goods to Hong Kong. Said purported shipping
contract did not have any provisions stating whether the product had actually
shipped, its destination, or the timing of the shipment

[blastin]

PARTIES
8. Plaintiff Boss Consulting, Inc. (“Boss”) is a corporation organized in
Utah, and with business offices in California. It is a product distributor.
9. On information and belief, and thereon alleged, Defendant Terminator
Armor, Inc. (“Terminator”) is a corporation organized in Arizona, and is a
distributor and importer of products with headquarters at 1375 N. Miller Road,
Tempe, Arizona 85281.
Case 8:20-cv-01897-MEMF-KES Document 1 Filed 10/01/20 Page 2 of 22 Page ID #:2

COMPLAINT
PAGE 3
10. On information and belief, and thereon alleged, Defendant Bourque
Industries, Inc. (“Bourque Industries”) is a corporation organized in Nevada and
registered as a foreign corporation in Arizona, is a distributor and importer of
products, and maintains a business office in Arizona.
11. On information and belief, and thereon alleged, Defendant Carol J.
Condon (“Condon”) is an individual who is a director and/or officer of both
Defendants Terminator and Bourque Industries, and who is a resident of Arizona.
12. On information and belief, and thereon alleged, Defendant John
Bourque (“Bourque”) is an individual who is a director and/or officer of both
Defendants Terminator and Bourque Industries, and who is a resident of Arizona.
13. On information and belief, Defendant Redstone Investment Group
LLC, (“Redstone”) is an entity that is doing business as Redstone Advisory Trust,
offering investment and escrow services and which has offices in Newport Beach,
California.
14. On information and belief, Defendant Aaron M. McKown
(“McKown”) is an attorney, is associated with the Redstone Investment Group
LLC, maintains offices in Newport Beach, California, and is a resident of
California.
15. On information and belief, Defendant Aaron M. McKown P.A.
(“McKown P.A.”) is an entity organized as a Professional Association in Florida,
having as its principal Defendant McKown, and also being associated with the
Redstone Investment Group LLC.
16. On information and belief, Defendant Ohana Financial (“Ohana”), is a
banking and financial institution that maintains offices in Utah.
17. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon avers, that Defendants
Bourque and Condon, and each of them, are and at all materials times relevant to
this Complaint have been, the agents, servants, and/or employees of Defendants
Terminator and Bourque Industries, purporting to act within the scope of said
Case 8:20-cv-01897-MEMF-KES Document 1 Filed 10/01/20 Page 3 of 22 Page ID #:3

COMPLAINT
PAGE 4
agency, service or employment, in performing the acts and omissions to act as
alleged in this Complaint. Each of said Defendants so named in this paragraph are
believed to, and are alleged to, have been acting in concert with, as employees,
agents, or co-conspirators, or members of a joint venture of, each of the other
Defendants so named in this paragraph, and therefore are alleged to be liable
jointly and severally for the claims set forth herein in relation them.
18. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon avers, that Defendants
McKown, McKown P.A., and Redstone, and each of them, are and at all materials
times relevant to this Complaint have been, the agents, servants, and/or employees
of each other, purporting to act within the scope of said agency, service or
employment, in performing the acts and omissions to act as alleged in this
Complaint. Each of said Defendants so named in this paragraph are believed to,
and are alleged to, have been acting in concert with, as employees, agents, or coconspirators, or members of a joint venture of, each of the other Defendants so
named in this paragraph, and therefore are alleged to be liable jointly and severally
for the claims set forth herein in relation to them.
19. Defendant Condon is, on information and belief, and thereon alleged,
to be a shareholder, director, and/or officer of Defendant Terminator. At all time
relevant to the events alleged herein, it is alleged, on information and belief, that
Defendant Condon maintained actual immediate control over Defendant
Terminator’s assets and operations, such that Defendant Terminator was nothing
more than a mere instrumentality of Defendant Condon, who held effective
ownership of Defendant Terminator’s assets and paid the expenses related to
ownership, maintenance, and operations of Defendant Terminator. It is further
alleged on information and belief Defendant Condon is the alter ego of Defendant
Terminator because she has acted as the principal of Defendant Terminator and
maintained control over its assets, daily fiscal policies, and operations.
20. Defendant Condon is, on information and belief, and thereon alleged,
Case 8:20-cv-01897-MEMF-KES Document 1 Filed 10/01/20 Page 4 of 22 Page ID #:4
Defendant Bourque maintained actual immediate control over Defendant
Bourque Industries’ assets and operations, such that Defendant Bourque Industries
was nothing more than a mere instrumentality of Defendant Bourque, who held
Case 8:20-cv-01897-MEMF-KES Document 1 Filed 10/01/20 Page 5 of 22 Page ID #:5

COMPLAINT
PAGE 6
effective ownership of Defendant Bourque Industries’ assets and paid the expenses
related to ownership, maintenance, and operations of Defendant Bourque
Industries. It is further alleged on information and belief Defendant Bourque is the
alter ego of Defendant Bourque Industries because he has acted as the principal of
Defendant Bourque Industries and maint

[blastin]

JURISDICTION AND VENUE
3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 USC § 1331 and
the U.S. Const., Art. III, because this case presents a federal question under the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1962.
4. Plaintiff’s damages far exceed $75,000.
5. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the pattern
of unlawful and fraudulent practices alleged in this Complaint was perpetrated and
committed in the County of Orange, State of California.
6. Plaintiff further alleges that the counterfeit goods were imported into
California by certain of the Defendants and from there were transported by said
same Defendants across state lines to the buyer.
7. Plaintiff further alleges that certain of the Defendants are residents of
and/or maintain business offices within Orange County, California.

[blastin]

COMPLAINT
Comes now, Plaintiff Boss Consulting, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Boss”), sues
Defendants, and alleges in this Complaint as follows:
NATURE OF ACTION
1. This is a civil action for fraud and racketeering activities, breach of
contract, conversion, and unfair business practices.
2. Plaintiff is a product distributor of goods. Plaintiff was authorized by
Case 8:20-cv-01897-MEMF-KES Document 1 Filed 10/01/20 Page 1 of 22 Page ID
COMPLAINT
PAGE 2
a buyer to act as its representative to acquire certain personal protective equipment
(PPE), quantities in the millions. Plaintiff entered into a transaction with a seller
who claimed to have goods meeting the specifications and quantity requested, but
who provided counterfeit goods. This transaction was made through the services of
an investment group, and when the entire transaction was rejected, no money was
refunded to Plaintiff, leaving her liable for millions of dollars to the buyer of the
goods.

[gotmilk]

A BORK fall from .008 to .0008 is a 90% decrease (down .0072).

While we all agree that a 90% lost is big time, BORK is at a value that the above change is less than one penny, so very doable.

If John Bourque does indeed go back to prison he will "take" Bourque Industries with him as he did last time he lost his freedom. Meaning, John Bourque will not allow Bourque Industries Board of Director Puppets to bring in new folks to run Bourque Industries. Once again, I'm sure in the near future these folks will find lawsuits brought against them where they already violated their duties to protect the shareholders, of which continues to this day.

[Spartanfan1]

Haha… it’s got a long ways to go for that. It’s closer to .008 than .0008

[mdb1]

Bork has been $.0008 before and could be again.

[gotmilk]

I called on the telephone 3 Boss Consulting companies from a google search and none of them had any idea what the fudge I was talking about.

[gotmilk]

"scam of Boss Consulting and the 3M Masks"

Please explain some more information.

Did Bourque Industries have an interest or involvement in 3M Masks?

What "scam" is present here?

Thanks,
Doug

[blastin]

Hi All,

Right now JB and CJ are trying to stay out of jail please forgive them if their not returning calls. Their looking for a new attorney from the scam of Boss Consulting and the 3M Masks. Here's a little update:

In January 2021, Boss Consulting, Inc. (“Boss”) Boss filed its First Amended Complaint
in this case, alleging a number of claims against Terminator Armor, Inc., Bourque Industries, Inc.,
John M. Bourque, Carol J. Condon, Redstone Advisory Trust2
, Aaron M. McKown, Aaron M.
McKown, P.A., and Ohana Financial Capital, Inc.3

Redstone Advisory Trust, Aaron M. McKown, and Aaron M. McKown, P.A. later filed a
Third Party Complaint naming Trilithon Sanitation Inc. (“Trilithon”), Semisi “James” Niu
(“Niu”), and James Evans (“Evans”) as Third Party Defendants.4
ECF No. 57.
In February 2022, Kevin D. Hughes and Aaron P. Dodd filed the instant Motion for Leave
to Withdraw as Counsel for all the parties they represented in this action, namely,
Defendant/Cross-Defendant Ohana as well as Third-Party Defendants Trilithon, Niu, and Evans.
The Court held a hearing on the Motion on March 17, 2022. Present at the hearing were
Hughes, Dodd, Niu, and Evans in addition to counsel for Boss as well as counsel for Redstone
Advisory Trust, Aaron M. McKown, and Aaron M. McKown, P.A. (the “Redstone Defendants”),
and counsel for Terminator Armor, Inc., Bourque Industries, Inc., John M. Bourque, and Carol J.
Condon (the “Terminator Defendants”

[FuriousX]

I agree. All the BS to give the court an appearance of a pulse at BORK, like the "New website coming soon" was just that; BS.

Since the vacate absolutely nothing but crickets.

Only reason for filings is to show some fake sign of life to get DeNunzio to go away and stay away.

Yes, "It's time for DeNunzio to take a second look......."

[gotmilk]

It's time for DeNunzio to take a second look at Bourque Industries to determine if they were incorrect in the following action.

12/01/2021 Motion for Appointment
Petitioners Application for Appointment of Custodianship - Vacated

The V Financial Group are in the business of creating "blank check shell companies" to sell to businesses looking to go public.

The Hurting in the Dark Shareholders would be better served if a company that already has established a stream of revenue selling products took over this shell that John Bourque made fools of us.

Whomever posted the following is Fool Number One.
"John Bourque is back with a vengeance."
"There will be a twist to the [sad BORK] story."

[Spartanfan1]

It ain’t .001… and it won’t be.

[gotmilk]

Bourque Industries (BORK) -8.33%

[gotmilk]

Yes, Eventually all BORKs going to 0.001 slowely but surely.

[mdb1]

hit $.007s again with almost no volume

[gotmilk]

BORK -24%

[mdb1]

i think JB took a $600 million dollar company and made into a $0 (actually negative) dollar company. how sad.