BioAmber Inc fka BIOAQ

[doughnuthole]

Yes I don't think you're him or he is you or she.. I guess my question is why do people still believe? It makes no sense... But yeah if there is a lawyer at cassels named Beth McCoy. And real McCoys alias wasn't born until 2018 and all her/his posts are all about bioamber krr and there's over 10k posts about it ...... things that make you go hmmm....

[TheRealMrPirate]

Formerly #09072Q106 - FKA bioaq
Although late, I'm actually happy to see you doing some real DD, I can't say much for others.
ChatGPT is good but take it with a grain of salt, it's not 100% accurate.
McCoy is not me & I'm not him, he is correct in his posts though. Everyone knows where to find me, the link is public.
Several of us post the same things because they are "Fact" - Facts do not change.
Unfortunately, there are no shares left to give up. That's been pointed out hundreds of times here.
Even when the shares did exist (the company still existed), it was still not possible for the shares to change hands with the cusip indefinitely suspended.
There is a big different between a cusip suspension & a delisting, correct.
Not only have both occurred with former BioAmber, the ticker #BIOA has been reassigned to another current Nasdaq listing.

But that still doesn't answer the question of radio silence for over 6 years

As far as radio silence, the question has been factually answered.
The company no longer exists - all three entities that comprised "The Company- BioAmber Inc" are out of business and the controlling corporation has been dissolved.
There is no one home and there is no home for one to make any further announcement concerning the former company.

[doughnuthole]

So I was talking with chat GPT again and I asked what reason would a lawyer have to keep talking about a dead stock. And I went on real McCoys post and I see that alias was born in 2018 December time frame. What else was going on regarding bioamber in december? I also see that there's 10,000 posts regarding bio Amber there's a few posts regarding another security but the main attention and energy has been going into bio Amber. Very interesting. But then the other question is what are we waiting on? There's lots of dots to connect but at the end of the day the company is still radio silent so what are we waiting on I hope it's not that people are expecting us to give up our sharers that are just collecting dust because there's no point in doing that. Also chat GPT says there is a difference in a cusip suspension versus an outright delisting... I have to say I got more out of chat GPT than I did when I called the OSB and when I called finra and when I called the sec... I see why they've made a correlation between Beth and real as being the same person... But that still doesn't answer the question of radio silence for over 6 years

[Smattchew]

Ok, thank you for your unwavering commitment of time on this fka $bioaq forum!

[TheRealMrPirate]

You haven't schooled anyone from the start. The company is gone just like your common sense. You're about as dumb as the Iron Pigeon, "too smart" in your own mind for your own good.

[New money98]

Lolll this time tomorrow Real Mac will be out, and the games will begin. Been saving my best for her, bout to school her before it's over and nothing but the literature. She won't be able to deflect to the CCAA LIQUIDATION PROCESS (EXHIBIT R-3a) going to shut all that down!!!

[TheRealMrPirate]

Nah, I've changed my mind.
Let's post nonsense till 2040 even though BioAmber no longer exists. The back and forth about nothingness kills the boredom, the conspiracy theories are entertaining.

[Pnypnchr]

I see that unessesary drama is better than silence here.

Thanks a million. Glad I can contribute.

[moola26]

Bwhahhahahaha the lengths these paid non shareholders will go to with their multiple alias!!
2025$$$$
MAJORITY HOLDING STRONG $

[I-Glow]

The more dollar signs in a post the less credible it is.

There you go again posting information that is outdated - the press release is from November 30, 2015 - more meaningless pumping fodder.

The 2nd link doesn't mention Bioamber and Amazon hasn't donated any money to the Defunct company Bioamber.

"This website that has been restructuring for years with the name Bioamber explains Amazon's involvement with supporting Bioamber's technology
https://www.bioamber.com/lander"

Go check out the WayBack Machine (archive.org) and you will.find that Bioamber.com hasn't been active in many years. Who is currently the CEO of Bioamber - what's the phone number?

You are delusional to think that Amazon is funding Bioamber - there isn't any proof - call IR and ask them about any investments in Bioamber.

Amazon names all of the companies that they have funded under the Climate Pledge and. Bioamber isn't listed.

The link you posted - https://www.theclimatepledge.com/content/amazonclimatepledge/us/en/joint-action/sustainable-plastic-materials-project.html

You have posted proof that Amazon doesn't know the name Bioamber.

Prove that https://www.bioamber.com/lander is owned by Amazon - call the Amazon IR department and ask them about the URL.

IG

[New money98]

Simple, It's under seal but his acquaintance at Cassels has access to a copy......let's just end this I'll never post again but until then it's...AAANNNDD THE NNNNNNEEEEEEEWWWWWW......!!! P.s Remember the judge stated that all confidentiality agreements will survive past the Ccaa Liquidation PROCESS or R-3a as we know it!!!! See how easy that was, in 2025 we putting names to documents. Wonder what the other transaction or process R-3b holds....

[biowin]

Sorry but Bioamber is already part of the climate pledge act
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/11/30/white-house-announces-additional-commitments-american-business-act

https://www.theclimatepledge.com/us/en/History

This website that has been restructuring for years with the name Bioamber explains Amazon's involvement with supporting Bioamber's technology
https://www.bioamber.com/lander

https://www.theclimatepledge.com/content/amazonclimatepledge/us/en/joint-action/sustainable-plastic-materials-project.html

Confidentiality $$$$ https://www.bioamber.com/lander

It's possible KKR/Lcy bought the Canadian Subsidiaries business and Amazon bought Bioamber Inc (The US company), 2 separate sales

[Brucebannerr]

Soup hahaha ! Nobody posting fantasy lies on that board years later. The shareholders in that one have half a brain and know how bankruptcy works apparently. There were a few we are golden posters. But they finally woke up .

[TheRealMrPirate]

tell him to get a copy of R-3b

You're a big boy, why not get your own copy? 🤣

[New money98]

Lmao 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣.....I know your names doughnut but I'll just call you nut...I know real mck is in jail but geez! The recent posters are making me feel real good about Bioaq.

[doughnuthole]

You know now that I think about it this is starting to ring a bell. I think that when I called about the redacted documents a few years back and I spoke to an Asian lady on the phone she said the redacted documents weren't keeping some secret transaction under seal but rather keeping people's financial information unavailable to the public

[New money98]

Lmao....so you're saying that exhibit R-3a for 4.3m ended it? Well, unless there were typos, Exhibit R-3a also spoke of transactions and another process. The monitors lawyers provided documentation stating that Exhibit R-3b was under seal.........hmmm....if the redacted and unredacted copy of R-3a released why was a separate Purchaser's letter of intent R-3b left under seal? It's 2025 we leveling up, and we doing it with the literature. I mean, you guys always point to the 4.3m lolll. Hey D98 knows someone at Cassels, tell him to get a copy of R-3b and prove me wrong. But until then...Aaaaaannnnndddddd the Nnnnneeeeeewwwww........

[TheRealMrPirate]

Formerly #09072Q106 - FKA bioaq
Wilful ignorance is your downfall. ♿️
(#1) on that screen shot is the most important item in the entirety of this process - failure to understand.
You should have had a professional explain it to you, seeing as you clearly have no understanding.
You're right, you no longer own shares in anything formerly publicly traded as "BioAmber Inc".

we would care about the same in those tickers too.

In case you may have forgot, the ticker $BIOA is no longer attached to Delaware 4612067 either.
It's been reassigned.

The shares, company & ticker no longer exist. *poof* ☠️

[I-Glow]

In a bankruptcy the equity holders don't get to vote - only the secured and unsecured creditors vote.

In a public company bankruptcy, secured creditors are typically paid first, followed by unsecured creditors, and finally, shareholders who usually receive very little, if anything, as they are last in line to receive any remaining assets after all debts are paid off; this is known as the "absolute priority rule" in bankruptcy law.

The secured and unsecured creditors were impaired so by definition the equity holders don't receive anything.

In a public company bankruptcy, equity holders (shareholders) typically do not get to vote on whether to accept offers in liquidation. The process is governed by bankruptcy law, and the rights of equity holders are generally subordinate to those of creditors.

Equity holders usually have little to no say in the bankruptcy process, especially in liquidation cases. The bankruptcy trustee or liquidator is responsible for selling the company's assets and distributing the proceeds to creditors according to the priority established by bankruptcy law.

From the link you posted - "What about this Notarized to be true Motion that was never provided to SHAREHOLDERS..."

The Shareholders didn't get the information because they weren't voting on anything.

IG

[fireballka7]

wow, great, we own 0 shares in those companies, thanks for that. You wanna show us some SOUP and maybe some NIK too? we would care about the same in those tickers too.

[I-Glow]

The Bioamber Bankruptcy was disposed of on Friday, November 15, 2019.

Your documents are from August 29th 2018.

The investors money is gone - you lost your entire investment but you can't seem to accept it.

Why don't you get your Attorney to contact PwC and ask a few questions for you as a shareholder?

I have a feeling that will never happen because you and a few others are scared of the truth and there goes your Hopium.

IG

[I-Glow]

You have been grasping at straws for years - if anything has a Bio in it, you post it.

Bioamber filed for Bankruptcy - why wouldn't they have bought the assets when the company was being liquidated? You do know that Bezos has his own investment - it is Bezos Expeditions.

Why don't you ever post your research such as who owns bioamber.com/lander.

In the first link it doesn't mention anything about Bioamber.

"Amazon is investing in Toronto-based bioplastics company Genecis as part of its Climate Pledge Fund.

Founded by scientist Luna Yu, Genecis uses organic waste (like food table scraps) to create a biodegradable bioplastic that is an alternative to conventional plastic packaging."

Once again, you will post anything that has Bio in it.

The next link and nothing about Bioamber.

Amazon’s Climate Pledge Fund adds investments in startups focused on e-waste, carbon storage, and lower-carbon buildings
We’ve also incorporated five CPF companies into our operations, including electric vehicle charging, greenhouse agriculture, and AI-powered recycling.

The 3rd link is the Amazon Climate Pledge and still nothing about Bioamber. Odd that Amazon names all of the companies they have invested in but left out Bioamber. LMAO!

Here take a look and show everyone where Amazon has invested in Bioamber.

The 4th link is from Dec 01, 2015 - you certainly don't understand how to do research. This is typical of the BS you have posted for years.

The 5th link is another from a Amazon press release and it doesn't mention Bioamber. Which is from September 2020:

The first five companies that the Climate Pledge Fund is investing in are:
CarbonCure Technologies
Pachama
Redwood Materials
Rivian
Turntide Technologies

You seem to be allergic to posting truthful information.

IG

[TheRealMrPirate]

Whatever suits your narrative 🤷
You have no clue what the word "credibility" means.

"Final nail in the coffin" - 100% fact.

[Pnypnchr]

"final post" was a lie= zero credibility.

[biowin]

How desperate is amazon for biodegradable packaging? Who is behind this website? https://www.bioamber.com/lander
Jeff Bezos investing huge eg.https://canadiangrocer.com/amazon-invests-toronto-based-climate-biotech-company

https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/sustainability/amazon-climate-pledge-fund-investments-molg-paebble-14trees

https://www.aboutamazon.eu/planet/the-climate-pledge

https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/bioamber-joins-the-american-business-act-on-climate-pledge-559282121.html

Sure it's confidential , just give us amazon shares, enough restructuring and control
https://www.bioamber.com/lander
https://press.aboutamazon.com/2020/9/amazon-announces-first-recipients-of-investments-from-2-billion-climate-pledge-fund

[trader59]

He posted the unredacted document right below the redacted one. 

[doughnuthole]

Redacted documents in legal proceedings, including those from bankruptcy cases, often remain redacted indefinitely unless a court order or legal process deems that the information can or should be disclosed. This is typically done to protect sensitive information such as trade secrets, financial details, or privacy-related data. Here's a breakdown of the situation and options for a shareholder:


---

Do Redacted Documents Stay Redacted for Years?

Yes, Typically They Do:

Legal and regulatory constraints often dictate that certain information remain confidential indefinitely to protect involved parties.

Even after the conclusion of bankruptcy proceedings, the confidentiality agreements or court orders that mandated redaction might still apply.

Companies and monitors like PWC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) are bound by these orders and cannot disclose redacted information without proper authorization.




---

Can a Random Shareholder Call PWC for an Unredacted File?

1. Unlikely Without Legal Authority:

As the monitoring entity, PWC is obligated to follow the court's confidentiality requirements.

They are unlikely to release unredacted files to individual shareholders unless the shareholder has legal standing and a court order permitting access.



2. Formal Requests:

Shareholders can formally request access to the information, but such requests are rarely granted unless the individual can demonstrate a specific legal need.

A court may need to approve the release of redacted documents if they are protected under bankruptcy or other legal frameworks.



3. Shareholder Rights:

While shareholders have certain rights, they do not automatically include access to confidential or redacted bankruptcy filings.

Publicly available documents through the court (e.g., via PACER in the U.S.) will typically be the extent of accessible information for a "random" shareholder.





---

Steps to Take for More Information

1. File a Motion in Court:

Shareholders can file a motion with the bankruptcy court requesting access to specific information, though success depends on the justification for access.



2. Engage Legal Counsel:

A lawyer can advise whether pursuing access to redacted documents is practical and assist in navigating legal processes.



3. Review Public Records:

Monitor filings and documents related to the bankruptcy case for any updates that might shed light on the redacted materials.



4. Engage with Creditor or Shareholder Committees:

If such groups exist, they may have insights or collective influence to petition for access.





---

Summary

It is highly unlikely that PWC or any other monitoring entity would provide an unredacted file to a shareholder without a court order. However, if you believe the redacted information is critical and that you have a legitimate interest or right to access it, you may consider taking legal steps to request access. Keep in mind that courts balance the interests of transparency with the need to protect confidential information, so success is not guaranteed.

[doughnuthole]

It would be highly unusual—and potentially problematic—for a company to undergo a complex restructuring or reorganization without communicating with its shareholders for three years. Shareholders are key stakeholders in the company and have certain rights, including the right to be informed about material events that could impact their investment.

Why Communication with Shareholders is Essential:

1. Legal Obligations:

Publicly traded companies are required by law to disclose material changes to their financial condition, operations, or structure through filings with regulatory bodies (e.g., SEC in the U.S.).

Shareholders typically vote on major restructuring decisions, such as mergers, acquisitions, or bankruptcy plans.



2. Transparency and Trust:

Lack of communication can erode trust and lead to shareholder dissatisfaction or legal challenges.

Transparent updates are critical for maintaining investor confidence.



3. Investor Relations:

Regular communication helps shareholders understand the company’s strategy, progress, and challenges during restructuring.




Exceptions or Explanations:

Private Companies: If the company is privately held, communication might be less frequent, but key investors would still expect updates.

Legal Restrictions: During certain legal proceedings (e.g., bankruptcy), there may be periods of limited communication, but this would not typically last for three years.

Governance Failures: A lack of communication for such an extended period could indicate governance issues, mismanagement, or an intentional effort to exclude shareholders.


Consequences of Non-Communication:

Shareholder Lawsuits: Shareholders may sue the company for breach of fiduciary duty or failure to disclose material information.

Regulatory Penalties: Public companies face fines and sanctions for failing to meet disclosure requirements.

Loss of Investor Confidence: Even if legal issues are avoided, shareholders may lose confidence in management.


If a company has not communicated with its shareholders for three years during a restructuring, it raises red flags, and shareholders should seek legal or professional advice to understand their rights and the company’s obligations.

[moola26]

Happy Friday bioamber shareholders$$

No one has or will give up their shares. I’m sorry paid lawyers non-shareholders continue to waste their time posting YIKES!
And as for shareholders = we are golden. 2025$
Majority holding strong$$$.

[TheRealMrPirate]

I'll be here waiting.

[New money98]

Smh I'll be back on the 13th.....

[TheRealMrPirate]

There is nothing that any of you post that needs debunking.
This ended years ago - it's over, nothing more is coming +6yrs later.
We can sit here till 2040 talking about nonsense.
Whatever turns your crank, I have lots of time.

[New money98]

I figured that you would at least try to debunk, but you can't! Hasn't been the same around here since Real Mc got locked up....smh #free Real Mc!!

[TheRealMrPirate]

Oh there's levels alright.♿️🤪

[New money98]

Lmao!!!! You got me missing Real Mc...smh! They got Tyson in jail and letting glass joe fill in...bruh, it's levels to this!!!

[New money98]

Hmmm...noticed it mentioned exhibit R-2...let's see where it's at........According to Pwc lawyer it's still under seal, along with R-3b.....but wait, let's see what R-3a says....
...redacted/unredacted! But but that's supposed to be the end? Show R-3b, that will end it, it's in the literature no avoiding it. We have R-3a now show R-3b Pwc lawyers says it exists, they could be lying but from what I'm hearing it will be.....AAAAAANNNNNNDDDDDDD THE NNNNNNNN EEEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWWW......shares....royalties...dividends....e reorganization....new money....new money98!!!! 2025 we leveling up!!!! Remember this, it can't be over with R-3a if there's a R-3b. A=Ccaa Liquidation PROCESS B=Complex 2-Step reorganization/restructuring!!!!!

[TheRealMrPirate]

I don't want you to discover the liquidation was fake, it was all staged.
Everyone was in on the restructuring so they don't have to pay shareholders out which is the biggest of expenses.

[Pnypnchr]

And NO ANSWER as to WHY!!!!!!

THAT is a very big concern here.

[TheRealMrPirate]

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175630356

[biowin]

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146910362

[TheRealMrPirate]

You're welcome 👍️

[Smattchew]

thank you for your unwavering commitment to a dead stock fka $bioaq

[TheRealMrPirate]

Formerly #09072Q106 - FKA bioaq
I'm sure McCoy got tired of answering your repetitive nothing posts like "Good Things Coming Very Very Very Soon!"
It's not like you have anything useful to add to the conversation.
Maybe you can take a stab at the question? ⬇️ or it that going to be another no answer? 🦗

[TheRealMrPirate]

Formerly #09072Q106 - FKA bioaq

Let me try one more time

What a dumb assessment 🤭, LCY Chemical didn't need bailing out.
KKR doesn't bail out losing propositions, they have added to their portfolio - LCY - privately held.

Bankruptcy protection was not "dismissed" = The proceedings changed over from CCAA/Chapter 11 bankruptcy _to_ CCAA/ Chapter 15 bankruptcy - hard "Fact"

BioAmber Inc - Voided / BioAmber Canada - Dissolved / BioAmber Sarnia - Dissolved.
BioAmber Canada Inc - the head office / the management arm of "The Company"
So now what - - - - ❓️
Where does that leave you as a former shareholder?

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175641733

[trader59]

I've answered you previously.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175524930

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175527635

[THEDOG 17]

They can’t answer that ! They can twist it though. Where is McCoy? She get fired! Ha Good Things Coming Very Very Very Soon!

[MadScholar1]

Those promoting the repetitive and moot Bioamber-shares-are-worthless final argument have not only failed to understand the import of having the BioAmber, Inc. motion for Bankruptcy ... dismissed ... they have also failed to answer a direct question I posed to toncat just before Christmas, which McCoy attempted to sweep under the rug.

Let me try one more time. If the Visolis/LCY "Upfront Purchase Price" of $4.34M was sufficient to purchase everything BioAmber—its patents, facility, and outstanding receipts—while abandoning potential tax breaks associated with its NOLS, both Tomcat and McCoy would not answer the question, "Why was the KKR $1.56B bailout necessary?"

In fact, there is a link between the dismissal of the U.S. Court's BioAmber, Inc. bankruptcy motion and the Upfront Purchase Price, which in no way was a sufficient amount of money to purchase everything BioAmber. It defies logic and financial praxis even to entertain such a thought. Historically, a restructuring process involving a merger either to save or repress the technology is the only explanation.

In BioAmber's case, saving the technology would seem to be the motive. And as I've argued before, there are explanations accounting for time spent since 2018.

[TheRealMrPirate]

Formerly #09072Q106 - FKA bioaq
That's all you got huh?
So, nothing to dispute "The Company" is gone LMAO !?
I told you, I won years ago. Your lack of DD into what a foreign arrangement was, was your downfall.
Maybe your lack of understanding CCAA? Or maybe just your stubbornness?
Bag holding sucks - Oh well 🤷

[moola26]

YIKES!! Did Koan just school these non shareholders again. Ouch!

We are so special to get all this attention by non shareholder lawyers .
2025$$$$

MAJORITY HOLDING STRONG$$$$l

[doughnuthole]

Who? Which lawyer defending this? Let me ask this question. Have you done any research on this yourself? Or are you just relying on feel good post on here because you think somebody has more credentials than you to tell you what's going on? Letting other people do your thinking for you isn't good. I'd love to be a millionaire. I'd love for this to turn out a certain way but the truth is we haven't heard anything from the company and almost 6 years now and everyone who I've spoken to has always insinuated in a nice way that I was really stupid to buy this stock. Finra the SEC the brokers the Chinese lady I talked to a couple years ago. Everyone I just don't see how this can turn out any other way even though I would really like it to