InvestorsHub Logo

dugie100

08/11/17 1:34 PM

#99737 RE: TenKay #99731

Get me to a nickel and I will be gone. True,Nasdaq...Please!! Maybe like that Greek shipper that does a monthly RS to stay on the DAQ, only way.

cngreen

08/11/17 1:52 PM

#99750 RE: TenKay #99731

so you are calling Tom Cellucci a liar about taking BVTK to Nasdaq.

shotsky

08/11/17 2:30 PM

#99787 RE: TenKay #99731

Correct - no NASDAQ with the current SS. It can't become a $40B company any time soon. With a 500,000,000 OS, it would STILL have to be a $2B company, still completely unfathomable as BVTK currently stands.
I don't see it happening with 'contracts' any time soon, regardless, since contract payments are spread out over the term of the contract, and they would have to stop borrowing to keep the doors open. And they would have to pay off the convertible debt and start showing profit. That's a deep hole they are in.

A merger with a profitable company might do it though. Again, I mention ICS-Nett as a potential. We don't know what he's really thinking of, but he MUST know that NASDAQ is not within reach, so...there is something that he thinks could do it.

glennbama

08/11/17 2:42 PM

#99794 RE: TenKay #99731

They dang sure will not get there with a STOP sign at there door. This pinky is starting to become stinky!!

boomer0921

08/11/17 9:34 PM

#99953 RE: TenKay #99731

Here is a better synopsis: Tom is being realistic because he is writing a new book about it chapter by chapter as we speak or he is being realistic because he already knows he is as impatient as we are to get there and also knows much more than us being 5 chapters ahead which puts him at a much higher intelligence level than people give him credit for, that being immensely smart. Thank you Mr Cellucci for affording me an opportunity at financial independence. GLTA. BVTK$$$$$