InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 41
Posts 2912
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/09/2011

Re: manshoon1 post# 44237

Thursday, 05/24/2012 1:25:37 AM

Thursday, May 24, 2012 1:25:37 AM

Post# of 276109

One of my opinions that I have had for a long while is that Kim has had interested buyers n such, but deals that would be low in revenues, and in essence could HURT kblb's pps. Not to say no big buyers have come along.... just saying that I believe he has/had the ability to do smaller sized deals... but did not for pps and keeping his(and shareholders) eyes set on big targets.

Most here are looking for very large deals to be signed... obviously revenues would start off slow in that scenario but lead to large revs. People understand and respect that scenario.

I think that I understand what you are saying, and I think that the approach you favor and believe that Kim also favors would be good for KBLB,
But for purely selfish reasons I would not mind a bit of volatility.

While slow continuous growth in revenue, leading to slow continuous growth in profit, would sooth many of the nervous nellys, some oscillation around an upward growth curve would be better for confident investors.

I also would rather see some income on the books sooner rather than more income a bit later.
I believe that first income will be a powerful tool towards bringing more recognition to the stock and the company and giving KBLB a market valuation closer to my personal valuation.

Mike L.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KBLB News