InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 3022
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/30/2010

Re: first mike post# 44214

Wednesday, 05/23/2012 11:53:11 PM

Wednesday, May 23, 2012 11:53:11 PM

Post# of 275954

Think that we are using slightly different definitions of income, revenue, and profit.
When I said: " with luck it will be offset by some small income before year's end." my intended meaning was the same as yours above.

=




Noted

I don't expect profitability this year.
I will be happy with a small to moderate income from sales showing on the 3rd quarter 10Q or at least on the next 10K.
i.e. $1500K of expenses, $150K of income.
Any income from product sales would be a very good sign that KBLB is moving out of the Development Stage and into an EPS mode, even if the EPS is still negative at year's end.



This is the issue tho, we can speculate that any revenues is good, but it might not be. What if the sales that start don't (by perception) favor well to earnings growth?

One of my opinions that I have had for a long while is that Kim has had interested buyers n such, but deals that would be low in revenues, and in essence could HURT kblb's pps. Not to say no big buyers have come along.... just saying that I believe he has/had the ability to do smaller sized deals... but did not for pps and keeping his(and shareholders) eyes set on big targets.

Most here are looking for very large deals to be signed... obviously revenues would start off slow in that scenario but lead to large revs. People understand and respect that scenario.
\
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KBLB News