InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 49
Posts 4758
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/18/2010

Re: NickDz post# 114364

Saturday, 08/29/2015 2:42:34 PM

Saturday, August 29, 2015 2:42:34 PM

Post# of 129051
Hate to say it Nick but..........

Crusen is right. The available records show Dabney has A (as in one) conviction on 21 counts of securities violations in 2005, but that is ONE not 21 as the sicko would have you believe, and its not MULTIPLE convictions in MULTIPLE countries as Crusen would have you believe.

The one thing those two seem to have in common is neither of them has much understanding of court proceedings or legal record keeping. Sicko apparently doesn't understand the difference between a conviction and the number of counts it includes, and the other apparently doesn't understand the difference between a "prayer for relief" and a court disposition record.

Additionally, the record shows Dabney paid his fine and adhered to the terms of his sanction, but these two either seem to forget that part or think a single conviction allows them to tar a person for life regardless of whether the person paid his debt to society or not.

In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act. - George Orwell

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.