Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Packaged end product, we always
Dreamed of that, Joe Miller always said. Do it.
X
Box of rocks, Google it.
Also Google cognitive decline....x
100 shares at 2.87 after market complete BS. Vein I will buy your shares up to $100k at $2.75. Next to Bidens beach home.
Deal? Cash or silver or gold.
X. Birdie told me to do so we can meet at Rehoboth your call. Put up or shut up.
Bingo, huge.
X Wai for it.
I had 4 buy orders and they all filled. Hip hip hurry, I say only 40 of my last 50 filled. Based on the volume it should be a decent afternoon.
X
This Pump and dump guy posted on the wrong board so I did some DD into this stock for the novices.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175137066
LOL and at .0027 you can own 1 million shares for $2,700.
A 1:10000 reverse split where 1 Million shares turned into 100 on March 27,2020
1 for 100 reverse split on August 24, 2018
1 For 500 in March of 2015
LOL check it out adjusted for those splits a share in 2011 was worth $1.2 Billion, You can not make this up. Just scroll to the bottom of Yahoo on the link below.
So if you invested 1 Billion dollars it would be worth less than a penny.
I'll put this on the right board for him
X
Oh the number are straight off of Yahoo
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AITX/history/?period1=1305725400&period2=1727281237&frequency=1mo
9k shorts played this morning, low volume, 3k more sells than buys and the price is even. I have my buy orders below yesterdays close, so none have filled yet.
X Not seeing a dominant MM so no games by them today. I'll watch for 11:20 then adjust accordingly
As I thought, Fintel is out of wack this is what was officially reported by date the latest short count was 38,670,165 for period ending 9/13/2024
1/12/2024 18,239,940
1/31/2024 12,571,775
2/15/2024 13,293,894 Price was about $3.00
2/29/2024 16,660,038
3/15/2024 21,50,6610
3/28/2024 27,619,151
4/15/2024 31,528,438 Price was $2.08 that is 30 Million Brought the price down $1 These 30Million shares are totally underwater
4/30/2024 32,684,028
5/15/2024 31,645,635
5/31/2024 29,296,021 Squeeze began Price rose to $9.02
6/14/2024 25,394,409 Squeeze Period
6/28/2024 26,982,603 Squeeze Period
7/15/2024 26,715,813 Squeeze Period
7/31/2024 26,103,871 Squeeze Period $20.68
8/15/2024 28,512,005 Short battle back with a meezly 2.4 Million shares Price 31.36
8/30/2024 23,454,186 5 Million shorts covered $29.04 (Many of us sold above $30 to help them out)
9/13/2024 38,670,165 Price $26.79 So 10 Million shorts played brought the price from $31.36 to $26.79
My current short interest on 9/24/23 is 42.63 Million Price $25.85
So 42.63-26.79 = 15.84 Million additional shares short brought the price down 94 cents.
I'd say that if the sort bought back those 15 Million shares this would be well north of $30 Bucks.
Honestly my shares here are free and I do not own enough to spend time but I thought that I'd lay out cause and effect of shorting.
X Currently I'm showing the highest short number ever with about 25 Million above water and 13 Million totally underwater where just $100k bet is now down over $500k. Something to watch.
Interesting, to say the least, Lebby did say "or order the devices from us". This is totally outside what I said earlier.
X I think Joe Miller would like that.
I'm sworn to secrecy, something is up. Zipppp
X. Good luck to all, and for all a good night.
Exciting isn't it? AI is pushing everyone into speeds that were unheard of a few years ago.
X I have 5 buy orders in here, I have plenty but I'm waiting on some discounted shares.
I won't be specific but I noticed a change in the MM's today, IMO the hold it down MM is sitting on the sideline. It kind of looks like spoof by ARCX now moved to GSCO?
X Who knows, it is game for them.
As info the device tested in the article contains Lightwaves perkinamine inside. Claudia the CEO of Polariton was seated 2 rows behind me at the shareholders meeting and was seen in the lab as well.
X. The oxygen thing (non-hermetically packaged modulators) referred to in the stability testing is a BIG deal (actually huge). It was the Achilles heal of prior version of polymers. Check that box, we certainly are checking a lot of boxes lately, never fast enough though, Many want everything now.
"This award serves as a highlight amidst our ongoing engagement with a wide spectrum of companies discussing device designs to materials supply and licensing agreements for our EO polymer materials with OEMs and tier-1 multinational corporations. We are confident in the implicit competitive advantage of our solution to support datacenters around the world which are responding to the burgeoning demand for higher speed data transmission from artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and other cloud-based services."
Dang Baby If sure there are any that remember when EO Polymers were a dream, Hybrid Integration in a Foundry was a total Pipe Dream, and we could not even spell PIC. This is recognition by the industry that were right. I cannot wait for the total buy in by the industry and every Tom, Dick and Harry to say the words Lightwave Logic.
X Patents in place, the price is right, I think I'll pick up a small bushel basket full. No debt and cash for a year.
The investors that have stood behind them, supported, encouraged and held strong should realize that this is a recognition that we were right all along, something that most people do not have the courage to do. I (X) would like to thank those investors as well.
The shorts will not go down easy though, so I'm sure there will be more games, those shares at a reduced price are a gift, the price you see is artificially the current price is for manipulation purposes only.
It is real and it is happening. F'ing PIC Hybrid Integration Platfriggingform Award, say that 3 times
Excellent point and let us not forget that over the past few years of being in stealth mode Lightwave has covered this space with patents on materials, patents on manufacturing, patents on applying material, patents on directing the light through devices, patents on protecting devices with ALD, patents on photonic integrated circuits (PIC), patents on integrating polymers with semiconductors and on and on. Let's not forget the driverless patent.
These patents now provide the freedom to manufacture using lightwaves electro-optic (EO) polymer materials systems and its optical device technology. And the best part is some block others from creating a competing technology that crosses one of these road blocks protected by a patent.
X
It is my opinion that they are no doubt working with NVDA but this is business, so NVDA will take advantage of this technology first, later it will become obvious how they are doing it, then others will follow. In order to block others, someone will buy Lightwave Logic out. That is the logical conclusion.
Currently, the price is where is where it is because about 20% (18.7) of the shares available have been borrowed and sold short. That is basically 1 in 5. To that end, I've been pushing for a licensing deal that includes a dividend in a pvt company. Understand that shares in private companies are not readily available on the street. The 20% of shares shorted would need to convince shareholders to sell them shares with the attached dividend before it is distributed. There are multiple verticals where this could be applied in a cookie cutter fashion. To date, Lebby wants not to do exclusive deals, but I think that could change.
There is simply too much money, we all have our price, most likely we will be taken over.
Xster xster read all about it. I wonder who is working the convention.
As info 2.4 million short today total looks like 32.4 million.
X
I'm showing the shorts loaded for bear today wirh 500k putting it at 23m. I haven't looked in a few days.
Might get a decent chance to buy.
X
I put in a buy order just for you.
X
Welcome aboard I'll put in a buy order now so let's see if it fills.
X. Why did choose this? I'm an old head so I like to keep up the investor base if possible. I proly know 100 investors here about half meet once a year, to brainstorm ask questions and do other investments, mostly private companies.
His money his choice, had he sold then and bought back twice as many shares he wouldn't have had anything to do when he woke up in the morning while he was out. Reminds me of the loop on "money" by pink floyd, over and over again.
X
Welcome aboard Tom Jr. and just in time for the conference. Show em what Delaware Cemical Dupont Boyz are made of. Hope to see you in May for a pint.
Awarded at $5.00. Nice
Xman
Let it play out, they can borrow for a while though, good luck, thanks. I'm as honest as the day is long.
Best to you, I have access to live short data. Let me look 243k shorted today, cost to borrow is only 3% or so.
X
Did some 2.72s today's, cool my me.
Folks this is 3 dimensional chess vs. Good ol fashion checkers.
X. You have to admit this is interesting. No hurry for me, let the best technology win. Time is on our side as AI is killing silicon Moores Law. Never fast enough though.
I don't think anyone bought based solely on your statement, No Worry. My order is still in place.
2k more buys than sells up 2 cents at I always say. 1k recovery equals 1 penny on the short recovery.
As info there are 10,600 of those 2k out of balance buy sells in 21,200,000 so at 2 cents that is $212.00 If I'm off by a factor on 10 that puts it at 21.20 plus 2.50 or $23.70.
X
Lol, too funny, punkln trying to flip the script. I could buy and sell you proly 10 times over and still not have any debt. If I sold at $15 I would have bought tried to buy back at $13 which would have pushed it back up. If one factors in the 21 Million short we are still at at least $20. It is hard for most to understand though.
Let me post the true story of Punkin so the Good folks know why he said that. Here you go.
The true story of the origins of the Great Punkin trying to flip the script, he will somehow enjoy me writing about him because I kind of live in his head.
Larry Dalton U of D Professor was well respected despite trouble going as far back as 1967, anyhow, he headed up the NSF funding and directed the money that he oversaw to his interests in a polymer that simply did not work. Way back when I was told that by the founders at Lightwave Logic that money that they were hoping for was directed 100% to Dalton (I think it was NSF money he did not tell me the origins of that money) but it was widely known that the polymer receiving the funding was flawed and Lightwaves was not. It was an obvious attempt to squash competition. Somehow Lightwave managed to survive.
OK so when I saw this going on I went to the Yahoo Lumera board and warned the Lumera investors that their polymer was flawed, some investors like TH looked at the facts, took my advice and came to Lightwave, last I heard he was up 8 figures here. Punkin who was on the Yahoo board did not listen and flooded the LWLG with messages that didn’t make any sense apparently thinking that somehow, that I could magically cause flaws in Lumeras polymer and if it wasn’t for me posting the modulators that Lumera sold to the industry would function. Yahoo changed the posting rules so that links could not be posted so folks on the Yahoo board moved here, Lumera went Bankrupt, hush money was donated,,,, you will see I put a link to the complete story below. That is why you see Punks name only being 8 years old, he created a new ID. Oh yes and Pitcook blames me also for “ruining the Yahoo board”. I just scratch my head. As for DOA I have no clue what he thinks I did, I only met him twice and Z gave a shirt headed for me to him, LOL. Oh hey check it out Lebby finally gave me a shirt at this year's SHM, only took a few decades.
So anyway, after living through that Pumpkin has become a self-appointed EO Polymer expert. I just scratch my head, I told him of the problem when the stock was at $8.00, he didn’t listen and the industry rejected that flawed technology shortly after the stock went down then they did an 8 for 1 reverse split and he thinks that if he posts negatively here it will make everything right, he is just projecting what he lived through there on this board. In essence he is carrying Larry Daltons damage to the origins of this company forward.
We are far and away past that oh and ironically thanks to us the investors at Lightwave the company has $30 million (almost the same amount that they got beat out of by LD) in the bank and no debt. Labs combined and expanded and still with no debt, Kind of cool, we did it! Coincidence?
And yet some Blame Lebby for the industries slow adoption of Polymers. Think about that for a moment as you read the story in the link below.
OK here is quick summary.
In Larry Dalton founded Lumera as a subsidiary of Microvision, Inc. in 2000
Back in 2006 Lumera jumped from to $1.58 on Friday, Oct. 13 to $7.56 on Oct. 24.
In 2007 they generated their first revenue, but the product was junk not stable and honestly it didn’t work. Remember that back then there was no test equipment available. As info Lightwave has worked with test equipment manufactures to develop today's test equipment, when I was touring the lab a few years ago I picked up the tester and turned it over serial number was 2.
Aug 15, 2007 — Aug 15 (Reuters) - Lumera Corp. LMRA.O said Chief Executive Thomas Mino resigned.
In this timeframe the company declared bankruptcy
March 27,2008 proposed merger Lumera Corporation (“Lumera”) @ GigOptix LLC, GigOptix, Inc.,
December 9, 2008 after the merger the price was $1.72, as adjusted to reflect a 1 for 8 reverse stock split.
A few years ago Lightwave bought Lumera’s (GigOptix) IP of particular interest was the device technology that was invented at U of W some of which was good, other patents help provide a roadblock.
Dalton Story he is referred to as “LD” throughout the story
2003-04 Part of the large investment in LD and the UW was $36million from the National Science Foundation (NSF) for a Science and Technology Center (STC) that was active from2002 to 2013 and was led by LD during its first five years.55In 2003, BK received a $40,000 subcontract from this center. On first examining some of LD’s materials, it was Kahr B. and Hollingsworth MD.2019.Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity. 1(1).DOI: 10.35122/jospi.2019.740579©2019 by the author(s). This article is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.6immediately obvious to BK that they did not have strong dye alignment, as reported in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.46The materials did not show linear dichroism,56,57,58,59,60thechange in the absorption of light with respect toa polarized light source (Figure 4). (Polarizing sunglasses work because they are responsive to polarized light reflected from horizontal surfaces such as wet roadways and bodies of water.) Linear dichroism was a prerequisite for the ordering of dyes that was presumed to be necessary for the materials to act as efficient light switches.61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68In 2004, LD’s team had never made measurements of linear dichroism, a phenomenon that was first observed in thin films of dyes in the middle of the 19thcentury.69,70BKbegan to make urgent requests to focus the attention of the leading investigators in the center on the question of dye orientation. These requests were ignored. BK appealed to Kwiram, a former Vice Provost for Research with high statureat the UW. Kwiram had become the executive director of LD’s NSF center. In 2004, BK told Kwiram, among many others, that the center’s science was wrong at its heart and that nobody would act.
BK was obliged to write a report for the NSF at the end of the 2003-4 fiscal year.75The report said what should have been obvious to a scientist in possession of any of LD’s samples and a computer monitor (the old sunglasses polaroid trick).
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/mjc2e53k936ksxnvsuhet/7765-massive-faculty-donations-and-institutional-conflicts-of-interest.pdf?rlkey=i4rxqnymxx48mbhsnchpeaeqj&dl=0
X
IMO, if the government gets involved, it is not a long bump. Good luck, though.
X
He owns 150 million of Coherent, sounds pretty knowledgeable to me.
X. This is a game changer, I have to pinch myself that we were so forward looking to get this technology and see the future. Life is what you make it, never fast enough for some, but honestly, they would know not what to do or how to invest the money for the future if they were right in 3 months so they just keep doubting themselves. I like the hunt, patience, study process and of course patents first. Which they have, foundries, yes we saw the bench models but now to see the big boys able to mass produce is cool as F. Dang baby first use nailed. Verticals, are next full disclosure Smitty did not know what a vertical was a few months ago now he's an expert, sorry to out him. For the life of me I just don't get it. It is almost like he thinks what we say on this board matters in a trillion dollar industry, sorry again for that.
Patience is a virtue.
X, I like Lebby, he has always been straight forward, if something was difficult he always said so. This is a trillion dollar industry that needs this.
Cool by me.
Place your bets and average in and above all take advantage of the discounted shares provided by the shorts. They need cheap shares, they buy then sell at the high point of the day, tis just a game ya know. Until it isn't.
I'm showing the shorts did nothing today, I'm showing 40% of free float is short? I didn't double check it though. Reverse splits do screw up the calculations for a few days.
X. I'm thinking $3 to $5 is a good entry point.
As info shorts sat on the sidelines today hence the 15 cent, I think it was a 5% rise in the price.
Folks it is not going to be easy for them to cover. I'll appear wrong until they start and that catalyst of a 1 million share buy in a day by them could have absolutely nothing to do with this. It could be forced by something in someone's portfolio.
X
As info shorts at 31 million they sold 500k into the market, yawn.
X
Lol, the market price is out of balance by 21 million shares that have been borrowed and sold, they need to be purchased back from a fairly small pool. I'll bet they forget to disclose that. "Perhaps the price would drop" it dropped because they sold 21 million shares that the owners did want to sell.
21 Million shares, dang nice place to be if you are long. Mine are in a lock box.
X
Some of the best things in life are long-term goals, to support them over time and see them come to fruition it is truly something bad ass rewarding. Make your bet, help it succeed. You reap what you sow, to see the foundries, personally hold a wafer, see the lab expansion and ready to rock and roll, to see many versions of perkinamine, increased staff, to see the who's who both in the chemical and optic space, to see polymers on the industry roadmap, to see silicon hitting the wall and needing help is yes very rewarding. The 21 million shorts try to paint an artificial story, and some buy in.
I remember just before the run to 20 bucks when I said here comes $4 then a move to the nasdaq, I was mocked for buying well below a buck It kind of feels that way now. One thing that I didn't see coming was AI and how that will force the adoption of this technology.
I'm going to enjoy watching the folks on the sidelines try and buy back in and trade elbows with the shorts. I would guess of my last 20 attempts at buying via limit orders below the prior days close only 4 filled times.
X, falling leaves, clean em up day. Let me stick in a couple low ball buy orders first.
Best to all.
Wow, sorry.
Thanks for those that take the time and expense to get info, weird, honest.
X. Best
Never seen so many trades under 100 shares, I guess that is because of the 1 for 50
X
The shorts returned 2.7k shares factor in the 1 for 50 that would have been 135k on friday. Anyhow that 2,700 shares returned is only 1% of the current outstanding 275 k shares shorted.
X need to remember the low float now. Im holding off I think 3 to 5 bucks ish?? 3 to 9 is a triple.
Oops, I'm not going to engage there so I won't even bother to read it. Looks like I'll put him on ignore, I like to remain positive.
That conservation over the weekend went something like this.
Ducky I'm not a good golfer because I can't drive and my putting sucks.
X perhaps golf isn't your game or you need an easier public type course.
Ducky I never said I needed advice I just wanted to vent, hopefully someone would say I wasn't that bad.
X, you can not make this up, risk tolerance in advestment portfolios most likely begins early on in life, and changes as we age because our timeline is shorter. If security isnt secured then adjustments must be made or it results in anxiety. For some reason folks think they can change a change in a trillion dollar industry by venting, weird. Due dilligence makes one more confident.
And this. So some try to pick a high and or a low and present the math as if it is logical that one could ever sell at the high and buy at the low without factoring in the supply and demand of the stock, nonsense hogwash. The fact is that there are 21 million extra shares that have been sold but do not exist because they are borrowed. The shorts can not just pick a price and magically cover at say $2.50, no the fact of the matter is that it will skyrocket if anyone trys to buy 21 million shares. And Should a deal get inked that consists of a dividend (remember only to the actual shares that exist). Of say $1 all the shorts have to do is write a check to the person that they borrowed those 21 million shares from and they can hang on. If the dividend is say 1 share in a public company they can buy shares in that company and provide them to whoever they borrowed their shares from. But if a private entity is formed for a licensing deal and new shares are dividended their is no public place that they could go to buy those shares to provide then to whoever they borrowed the shares from. So they would need to arrange to buy Lightwave shares with the dividend attached to give it back in a short period of time before that private share is detached and distributed to us. That would be interesting to watch. Especially if it happened multiple times in different verticals. In the event that they can not cover that dividend the broker is on the hook, will liquidate however much of their portfolio it takes to purchase those shares from you and I. We all have our price ya know.
I'm not sure everyone will understand but if say a Johnson and Johnson signs a deal to develop medical sensors under a new private company called Johnsons Light Sensors (JLS), Lightwave supplies the Perk for a fixed price J&J covers costs and operates the new venture the shorts need to figure out where how to get those private shares, there is no short market that they could borrow shares, fun fun.
X. Looks like Modulator development is complete, Next up is the vertical play, IMO that is what the latest additions to the board are for.
Multiple verticals in multiple deals equals a minefield for the shorts.
Like this. - I am amazed at what the examiner said, basically they said everything looks good, it covers a wide swath of devices, I dont see a problem but it would be easier for me if you broke down and submitted patents covering each device. Meanwhile, the Lightwave gang has covered the entire food group until the expiration date. I'm pretty sure it covers "polymers" hopefully all polymers.
Something we need to read and zoom in on.
It's all about the verticals. To date, Lightwave focused on a single distinct use to show the industry how it is done. Oh, did you guys see Perk6 on the label of the bottle on the website. I remember talking to employees on the lab tour that the modifications to the polymer and future variations are basically unlimited. And the boss was certainly excited to tell me.
Still say we get taken over.
X