Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Can't please every one got to please your self Bro, for me its $$$IQST$$$$
Just noticing the stock price trend. I'm sure it will hit $.25s again sooner or later.
I remember when it hit the $2s and there were those complaining.
Is there a point to your post? Are you hoping for the stock to be in the $teens?
I will say Leo and crew have totally missed a window of opportunity with the market if they would correct their net earnings side !! Without net earnings means more debt and dilution which is clearly the path they have chosen!! Pathetic is all I can say!! Teens next week for sure
Yes, just another mistake. a common junction. Make all the mistakes you want. For me it is a hold, not buying or selling. Time will tell. If go north may buy. Go south hold. Still have high hopes.
One thing is for sure you can’t ask for a better market and conditions then what we are slap dab in the middle of!! Thankful to see the market out perform expectations!! That’s what companies with merit do in correct market conditions lol!! 😂 not this pos that’s for sure!!
Meant to say back to teens not tennis lol!! Like I said sub penny by December watch
Looks like back to tennis by end of today for sure!! 91k shares sold in like 12 minutes at open bell lmao 🤣!! This pos is relentless and apparently the news of debt and dilution isn’t amazing nor is the q2 results lol
Oh look, the magic formula for making a profit has been discovered.
NASDAQ’S BOARD DIVERSITY RULE: WHAT COMPANIES SHOULD KNOW
Last Updated February 28, 2023
BOARD DIVERSITY RULE HIGHLIGHTS
Nasdaq’s Board Diversity Rule requires companies listed on Nasdaq’s U.S. exchange to:
• Publicly disclose board-level diversity statistics annually using a standardized template; and
• Have, or explain why they do not have, diverse directors.
The rule provides additional flexibility for Smaller Reporting Companies and Foreign Issuers, which can meet the
diversity objective by including two female directors, and for all companies with five or fewer directors, which
can meet the diversity objective by including one diverse director.
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/assets/Board%20Diversity%20Disclosure%20Five%20Things.pdf
https://www.nasdaq.com/board-diversity
Oh, how perfect. I'm thinking of starting a publicly held pottery firm. Solar crock pots to be specific....
I hate the fact they are not addressing these things....they just let the PPS fall
One board member must be a woman; the other must identify as an underrepresented minority or LGBTQ+ and can be a man. Companies that list on Nasdaq's Capital Market tier, which is focused on smaller firms, have until Dec. 31, 2026, to have two diverse directors.
https://consciousnessleaders.com/a-new-mandate-for-diversity-and-inclusion-set-by-nasdaq/
Please post the evidence upon which you are basing this statement:
"I've heard NASDAQ is implementing DEI requirements to get on that exchange."
Did you read an article or see a link?
I was thinking, Why not just do a shelf offering then they could dilute at current market value rather than give shares away cheap with a public offering. Now I know the dilution would kill the price but they would be dollars ahead and could rebuild from there. Just my thoughts.
Let’s take this years projected numbers and assume the margins don’t change which is realistic as they haven’t changed yet and say the company does 300 million this year and nets 1 million which I doubt they will do that means even if they 10x revenue over the next 10 years and become a 3 billion revenue company and only net 10 million a year where is any room for any investor or institution? The answer is there is no room for any realistic institution or investor with this pos and their pos margins!! Ships sinking for dang sure no saving it now !!
IQST excels at all the latest buzzwords and mgmt are the craftiest of politicians. I wouldn't worry about that requirement.
How is IQST with DEI? I've heard NASDAQ is implementing DEI requirements to get on that exchange. Or perhaps they should consider the TXSE since it looks like NASDAQ likely won't happen this year.
Check that sexy s-1 out again boys from April!! They dam sure will be dumping 48 million shares come December as a default in the loan!! Then I expect them to dilute the other 80 million shares to raise money for operations and finally after all that smoke sinks in and they are down to 15,000 shareholders they pull the f-it let’s reverse splitski on that butt and that my friends will be the icing on the cake for this pos company!! I told yall back in January when they started this whole debt and dilution deal that now it’s serious debt and dilution incoming!! No one believed me or thought it was possible even the DA boiler who made a video about how iqst is now net income positive so won’t have to dilute anymore shares from here on out lmao!! That was back in March I believe and I live the share count was 171 million at the time!! I see where this is going and now I believe they will dilute the remaining shares then issue more so be ready for at least 300 million shares to be a float by next year you can bet your sweet butt on that unless they reverse split then issue the shares which would be smarter for leotardo and crew!!
Feels great to know you own a true pos when your right where you started a position 4 years 8 months ago lmao !! Every other stock is booming compared to this speculative over promised under delivered true pos !! Ships sinking for dam sure!! Retail is out of powder and it shows in the pathetic share volume daily which leaves the inevitable sinking ship!! Oh the dream of hitting the lotto with this is gone for dam sure !! No one trust the ceo and or has faith except regards
Lflhdy he’s referring to the shares held for collateral as he’s saying they have zero intentions of paying that loan back!! Your referring to the Audi option buy in price which is 2 different things buddy!! It’s all good
Lol. That makes it really better......
Actually the price is .157 less 30% for the lowest buy in price of .11
and no way will they come up with anywhere near 81 mil for the quarter...........
I do not think r/s......it will not help them and make it worse........never have I seen a r/s help a co
CREDIBILITY IS THE ISSUE........
I've stated it before and I'll say it again....BM and the Pumpers will be selling shareholders on an R/S in the near future.
Preliminary revenue estimates only, doesn't mean sales were actually down.
Estimated 27M in Apr & again in May. Same for June would be 81M for the quarter. If that was the case, they'd want to state lower for a margin of error regardless. They said 77M so ya that'd be 4M less in June but wanting the company to answer why sales decline 4M is not a legitimate question because again, it's just preliminary numbers. 77M should be taken as the "minimum" they expect to report. We also have to take elimination into consideration, cross company sales. Maybe they did 27M in all 3 months but are concerned they may have a few million in cross company sales that were initially, on a monthly preliminary basis, not accounted for yet.
In Q1 they said they did 50M preliminary and it was actually 51.4M when filed. Looking at monthly preliminary numbers, they said Jan 17M, Feb 16M, Mar 17M for 50M preliminary and actually did 1.4 million over that.
Point is, you can't read too much into monthly estimates. They're just an indicator of how things are going, not exact numbers yet. That's basically what preliminary means.
Remember, they still have that S-1 from April. They will be dumping 50 million shares at the end of December at a conversion rate at .10. That is why this is stuck in the .20's with all the good news. As I have mentioned, the executives have very few common shares. The preferred shares they have are not subject to a reverse split. So, they will dump the 50 million to pay off the loan with shares and then do a reverse. When have you seen executives with such a low share count.
So they haven’t acquired Lynn yet because they are broke and can’t afford the monthly payment!! Sales aren’t as they expected clearly down 4 million in a month that’s like 6 days of no revenue!!
2 things they need to address and sad they have not.......why sales were down by appr 4 million in June and why LYNX has not closed.....
It’s coiling up!! Been coiling and consolidating for about 4 years now lol!!
one thing for sure...............we need some news....IQST
Which "serious" inst investors are waiting?
lishious It is usually a trade-off I think. By raising prices a company will usually sell less but may even so make more money in some cases. Long-term it may or may not be a good idea to just have a very slim profit margin if that makes it possible to increase sales fast. It all depends on the circumstances. My guess is that it will probably not work out well for IQST to have a net profit margin next to nil.
quigley We could not disagree more! Time will show who is closest to the truth.
I've been hearing that for 5 years
As soon as the company announces that it has acquired or partnered with a single switching platform, margins will, at minimum, begin to equal industry standards. Serious institutional investors are waiting in anticipation. IT is the big event upon which their goal of achieving $1 billion in revenues depends.
Well, I am not going anywhere, see my other respond a few minutes ago.
You may be exactly right on, which begs the question, how long before this company becomes positive net earnings on a quarterly basis??? This quarter, qtr. ending 9/30 and 12/31 will give us a much better idea on how those two latest acquisitions have done for IQST. Will be interesting.
Sure I’ll play along !! Going parabolic very soon !!
Summary of recent geniuses: "Hey! If they raise their prices, they'll make more money. I fixed it" Others: "Why yes, let's dive into that logically. What an interesting solution."
this is a 10 DOLLAR STOCK trading for a quarter.....WOW..WHAT A BUY...IQST ALL THE WAY
DRJ69 My guess is that there is very keen price competition.
A 1% increase in price would equate to $2.9M in extra revenue if the base revenue was $290M. Does not sound like much, but maybe they are constricted at what they are currently pricing their products, do not know, but one would think based on revenue sales of $290M, a 1% increase would be insignificant to the buyers, put it another way, if a projected sale was $100K, a 1% increase would only be $1K, so my question is this, what is preventing them from such a minor increase in price? other competition?
Everyday same old story for years now there is always 3/1 sell come to buy volume that’s why this amazing stock sinks everyday it is relentless but what else can we expect with the uneducated management team honestly ? Guess this ain’t our lotto ticket lmao 🤣
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |