Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Good god man, what's it going to take to stop this woman and her conspirators?
hey nixxi i be her prob officer would like to see some of this stuff thats been goin on with her and cohorts LOL. Isnt it a violation of probation to associate with felons.
Roxanna Weber and friends....LOL.....LOL....LOL....
She and they are and were total fraudsters.
It is beyond LAUGHABLE.
WHAT a BRILLIANT(lol)SCAM................
The disappointing part of this felony case for me is that we didn't learn about it before it went to trial. Why? Because the only possible weak defense that I can think of on the felony charge is that slick Roxie would claim that she didn't see the lights or hear the sirens of the police car that was attempting to pull her over. So, it would be the officer's word vs hers. THAT'S where the fun would start.
What I would have done is to contact the District Attorney, and give them all the Emax PRs and ask slick Roxie on the stand, "did you say on Aug 2010 that the dividends would be paid soon? What about in Dec 2010? Feb 2011? etc! Where they paid yet Ms Weber? Did you say Ms Weber that the audit was near completion in 2010? Was it Ms Weber? We have your accountant here to testify. Ms Weber, I have here 25 PRs you put out. Were ANY of those items you PRed ever completed? Any of them?" In short, she would end up having absolutely no credibility, and end up being convicted in part due to her decade of Emax bull! How fitting would that be!
In the end, she was convicted anyway of course!
The felony law that the Emax CEO was charged under:
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0300-0399/0316/Sections/0316.1935.html
"Any person who willfully flees or attempts to elude a law enforcement officer in an authorized law enforcement patrol vehicle, with agency insignia and other jurisdictional markings prominently displayed on the vehicle, with siren and lights activated commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084."
I am just trying to picture slick Roxie speeding away from the marked patrol car with it's lights flashing, thinking she would be able to elude him! lol! I'd give anything to see a tape of that scene!!!!! If only the officer could have said to her after he caught her, "where the hell are my dividends?".
felons can not be ceo of traded companies!
Details of Emax CEO's FELONY arrest and case
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=7710589
Register of Actions
Case No. 2011-CF-008234-A-O
STATE OF FLORIDA - VS - GREEN, ROXANNA LOU §
§
§
Case Type: Criminal Felony
Date Filed: 06/17/2011
Location: Div 16
Judicial Officer: Schreiber, Margaret H
ICJIS Document ID Number: 350435
Inmate Booking Number: 11023495
Uniform Case Number: 482011CF008234000AOX
Related Case Information
Related Cases
2011-CT-007475-A-O (Transferred)
Party Information
Lead Attorneys
Defendant GREEN, ROXANNA LOU
DOB: 05/02/1963 JOSEPH MORRELL, Esquire
Retained
407-425-1639(W)
Plaintiff STATE OF FLORIDA
Charge Information
Charges: GREEN, ROXANNA LOU Statute Level Date
1. FLEEING/ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE POLICE OFFICER 316.1935(1) ******* Third Degree - Felony ****** 06/17/2011
2. CR-DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE OF AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE 316.193(1) First Degree - Misd 06/17/2011
3. CR-RESISTING OFFICER WITHOUT VIOLENCE 843.02 First Degree - Misd 06/17/2011
Events & Orders of the Court
DISPOSITIONS
01/20/2012
Disposition (Judicial Officer: Schreiber, Margaret H)
1. FLEEING/ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE POLICE OFFICER
2 - Adjudicated Guilty Jury Trial
3. CR-RESISTING OFFICER WITHOUT VIOLENCE
2 - Acquitted Jury Trial
2. CR-DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE OF AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
2 - Adjudicated Guilty Jury Trial
01/20/2012
1 - Jail/ACS (Judicial Officer: Schreiber, Margaret H)
1. FLEEING/ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE POLICE OFFICER
06/17/2011 (TDF) 316.1935(1) (316.1935(1))
Community Service (Hours: 150)
Driver's License Suspended (Suspension/Revocation (With Specified Length by Court), Term: 1 Yr )
State Probation (36 Mo )
01/20/2012
Adult Type - Criminal Non Citation (Judicial Officer: Schreiber, Margaret H)
2. CR-DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE OF AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
06/17/2011 (FDM) 316.193(1) (316.193(1))
State Probation (12 Mo )
Driver's License Suspended (Suspension/Revocation (With Specified Length by Court), Term: 1 Yr )
Charge Reopen Status (01/27/2012, Reclosed, 002)
OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
07/17/2012 DCA Order: No Mandate Will be Issued in this Cause
5D12-1263
04/24/2012 Invoice
For Appeal Record
03/30/2012 Acknowledgment of Appeal
5D12-1263
03/16/2012 Notice of Appeal Recorded and Filed
02/16/2012 Order Denying Defendant's Motion for New Trial
01/30/2012 Bond Discharged
X6-00498059, 9060, 9061
01/27/2012 Motion for New Trial
01/27/2012 Motion for New Trial
01/25/2012 Pre-Trial Conference (8:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Schreiber, Margaret H)
TP 2/6/12
01/24/2012 Evidence Control Sheet
01/20/2012 Court Minutes
Jury Trial
01/20/2012 Order of Probation
01/20/2012 Order for Cost Recorded
as to Count 2
01/20/2012 Judgment of Acquittal Recorded & Filed
as to Count 3
01/20/2012 Order for Cost Recorded
01/20/2012 Notice of Fines and Costs
01/20/2012 Judgment Recorded & Filed
01/20/2012 Verdict
(3)
01/20/2012 Jury Instructions
01/20/2012 Order
Regarding Courtroom Decorum (2)
01/20/2012 Restitution Order / DNA Order / Victim Form
01/20/2012 Sentence Guidelines Score Sheet
01/18/2012 Notice of Taking Deposition(s)
01/13/2012 State's Witness List
Supplemental
01/12/2012 Notification of Expiration of Speedy Trial
01/12/2012 Reciprocal Discovery
12/08/2011 State's Witness List
08/23/2011 Arraignment (8:45 AM) (Judicial Officer Adams, John H, SR)
Written Plea of Not Guilty
08/23/2011 Court Minutes
Arraignment
07/28/2011 Information Filed
07/21/2011 Order Allowing Withdrawal
PD
07/15/2011 Motion to Withdraw
07/01/2011 Notice of Appearance; Waiver of Arraignment
WPN, Demand for Copy, Demand for Discovery, Demand for Statment of Particulars, Demand for Jury Trial c/atty
06/30/2011 Written Plea of Not Guilty; Waiver of Arraignment PD
06/17/2011 Do Not Allow E-Filing
06/17/2011 Complaint
06/17/2011 Court Minutes
IA
06/17/2011 Affidavit of Insolvency/Indigency
06/17/2011 Advice to Defendant, First Appearance
06/17/2011 Bond Filed
Pol/Aab $2500 X60049060
06/17/2011 Bond Filed
Pol/Aab $100 X60049061
06/17/2011 Bond Filed
Pol/Aab #X60049059 $500.
Financial Information
Defendant GREEN, ROXANNA LOU
Total Financial Assessment 1,357.99
Total Payments and Credits 1,357.99
Balance Due as of 10/23/2012 0.00
06/17/2011 Transaction Assessment 50.00
01/30/2012 Transaction Assessment 100.00
01/30/2012 Transaction Assessment 418.00
01/30/2012 Transaction Assessment 211.83
01/30/2012 Transaction Assessment 43.16
01/30/2012 Transaction Assessment 525.00
03/16/2012 Transaction Assessment 10.00
03/16/2012 Counter Payment Receipt # CR-2012-14494 GREEN, ROXANNA LOU (10.00)
07/24/2012 Counter Payment Receipt # CR-2012-34511 GREEN, ROXANNA LOU (1,347.99)
Instead of just owning up to this, she went to a jury trial and lost, and now has the nerve to file for appeal!
heres an interesting borrowed post
A/S was upped by slick Roxie to FIVE-BILLION-SHARES!
Does anyone have a written statement from the T/A that it is 3.5 billion? If so, we have a nice SEC case!!!
The A/S for EMXC is 3,500,000,000 not five billion. I just got off the phone with the T/A. OTC markets has it stated correctly.
Give me your estimate of how long it will be until the "informative" Emax website pages are back.
http://www.emaxworldwide.com/?q=node/14
"Please check back soon. Our website is being redone."
This has been this way about a month, I believe.
Emax's Eric Jeter has about as much talent in web development as he has in "managing" Emax! The horrific mindpix website is a typical example. A typical high school web developer could produce better! This is NOT 2002, Eric!
when do you think my dividend of shares will be released?
Just for fun, I checked and searched and there is not one post on this entire board mentioning the Authorized shares being raised to 5 Billion, before my post yesterday. There is not one website that listed the A/S as 5 billion, and there is not one statement from the company mentioning the increase to 5 billion!
So, nice try on calling it "old news".
FYI I am the source of A/S increase news for this POS! Don't you forget that! It was I who on this board brought up the last increase, and made slick roxie finally admit it on one of her paid interviews!
hi > i am good > i got out in time and money back so > no problema thanks ahve gwkend sir
I know the people that dreamed that pr up along with the "no r/s PR" over drinks he he
Well, There goes the Buy Back program...what a POS EMXC is
I guess Roxy lost her Calender. She has no clue about how long 6 months are. No filings yet and probably won't come. Thanks Roxy.
But you claim to have known it was 5 billion, "old news"! Obviously, had you REALLY known that it was 5 billion, you wouldn't have made the statement that it was near maxed out, and you would have correct my numbers.
Can you point me to a post where this "old news" was discussed here before?
From your numbers that you posted I said it was close to maxing out.
This is coming from the same person that said of the 3.27 billion issued was "closed to maxing out" the authorized shares? You consider 3.27 billion close to 5 billion shares? Really? Emax math?
She did it again! A/S up to 5billion shares!
Ladies and Gentlemen, the queen magician of multiplying shares did it again.... but she somehow didn't think to announce it... again! lol That's right, on August 1st, slick Roxie increased the authorization as follows, from her words in the filing: "The company is increasing their authorized common shares from 2,000,000 to 5,000,000,000 shares.
Put the drink down and take a bow Roxie! To 5 billion we go!!!!
Can you tell me what the "substance" was for the billions in increases in authorized shares over the past 9 years? This was $3 stock, split adjusted, in 2003, with 100 million authorized shares. Please list for us the "substance" for each year's increase below.
Outstanding Shares
12/31/2000 15,157,733
12/31/2001 36,219,733
12/31/2002 45,664,733
12/31/2003 65,734,733
3/31/2004 98,984,733 (3 months)
3/31/2004 14:1 reverse split 3/2004 98,984,733 old = 7,070,338 post split shares
6/30/2004 7,070,338
12/31/2004 15,738,497
12/31/2005 27,848,497
12/31/2006 137,693,722
12/31/2007 387,787,105
12/31/2008 1,378,065,364
12/31/2009 1,378,065,364
12/31/2010 2,291,972,864
Current....3,279,025,918
Only if there was no substance behind the decision
PLease share this on mpix as well:
also should be noted "The most important defense to an action for defamation is "truth", which is an absolute defense to an action for defamation. "
Interesting to also note she used a different ID then WEBBER as MPIX as she has claimed for many years. Was that the same as using a different company? But hey as I have heard before I am not married to this company.
also should be noted "The most important defense to an action for defamation is "truth", which is an absolute defense to an action for defamation.
PLease share this on mpix as well:
also should be noted "The most important defense to an action for defamation is "truth", which is an absolute defense to an action for defamation. "
Interesting to also note she used a different ID then WEBBER as MPIX as she has claimed for many years. Was that the same as using a different company? But hey as I have heard before I am not married to this company.
also should be noted "The most important defense to an action for defamation is "truth", which is an absolute defense to an action for defamation. "
I heard some recent picture where up for her on the MPIX board here
Has anyone heard from slick Roxie directly? Has she given up on the personal emails telling people how things are "looking good", and "you'll see big news ahead"? When was the last known slick Roxie contact to a shareholder?
So if the A/S gets increased significantly, say by a few billion, you would agree that would be awful for EMXC shareholders, correct?
Wow what a scam artist.......
I guess the upside is the AS is almost maxed. As long as it isn't increased
is this emax or mpix or rox's circus. LOL she spinning a new web yet.
Hey, any word on a progress of the Emax "buyback"? I think we need a good laugh. What's the progress now? We have documented over a billion new shares in dilution this year... how about the "buyback"?
Emax's biggest "product" is producing shares and diluting their "investors" as they cheer on the slick Roxy and the gang.
Year....Number of shares created, Roxanna Weber CEO
2001.....21,062,000
2002.....9,445,000
2003.....20,070,000
2004.....41,918,159
2005.....12,110,000
2006.....109,845,225
2007.....250,093,383
2008.....990,278,259
2010.....913,907,500
2011.....734,000,000
2011....1,560,442,691
2012....1,718,583,227
This means if you owned the all the shares in 2001 and held them until now, you would have gone from owning 100% of Emax, to less than 1% of Emax! lol
source - Emax filings
2012 was a VERY good year for dilution!
Shares Outstanding 3,279,025,918 a/o Aug 02, 2012
Float 2,400,062,000 a/o Aug 02, 2012
Authorized Shares 3,500,000,000 a/o Aug 02, 2012
Convicted felon was/is in charge of emax. ROX Remember, that fleeing or eluding cases are treated very severely by the judges and prosecution and the prosecution will do all its best to prove you guilty of all the offenses you have been charged with. Given the impact it will have on your driver’s license, the possibility of a prison sentence and heavy fines...
You can be charged of fleeing to elude if you willingly or knowingly refused to stop your vehicle after being ordered by a duly authorized law enforcement officer. The officer should be in uniform when he or she orders you to stop.
In the case if you willfully or purposely fled your vehicle after having stopped when the police officer ordered you too, that will also be considered as fleeing to elude. The law only applies to vehicles being driven on a street or highway in Florida.
At the time of fleeing, if the officer has lights and sirens activated in their vehicle, but you still drove away, you will face extra penalties. Similarly, if there was a high speed chase after you drove away with high speed or reckless driving, causing serious bodily injury or death of another person, then the charges against you will increase considerably.
Penalties for Fleeing to Elude in Orlando, Florida
The state of Florida takes fleeing to elude very seriously. The base offense of Fleeing to Elude a law enforcement officer is classified as a Third Degree Felony and is assigned a Level 1 offense under Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code. In such cases, the judge can impose up to 5 years in prison with up to 5 years of probation along with a maximum of $5,000 in fines. The driver’s license is also suspended for a minimum of 1 year up to a maximum of 5 years.
If you fled the police officer with lights and sirens activated, it is classified as a Third Degree Felony and is assigned as a Level 3 offense under Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code. The penalties for this offense are the same as that of the base offense, but the judge will impose punishments towards the higher side.
Fleeing and eluding with lights and sirens activated with high speed or reckless driving is classified as a Second Degree Felony and is assigned a Level 4 offense under Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code. The penalties include up to 15 years in prison and up to 15 years of probation along with up to $10,000 in fines. The driver license is also suspended for a minimum period of 1 year and a maximum of 5 years.
If during the chase, you cause serious bodily injury or death, it will be classified as a First Degree Felony and assigned a Level 7 offense under Florida’s law. In such cases, the judge will impose a minimum mandatory jail sentence of 3 years. Additional penalties include up to 30 years in prison and up to 30 years of probation with a maximum of $10,000 in fines. The driver’s license is also suspended for a minimum of 1 year and a maximum of 5 years.
NO Website is working still hmmm
I am forwarding this letter to you regarding our phone conversation Thursday, April 5th 2012 inquiring about the report filing requirements needed by eMax Holdings Corp (also known as eMax Worldwide, Inc.) to once again become fully reporting with your agency.
For over three years now, eMax has retained the firm McMullen Associates as our securities counsel to assist with reporting to your agency. Unfortunately, at this time it appears that the firm has yet to perform while payments are still being made. Last year after receiving the first correspondence from your office, I submitted the letter to our securities counsel and was instructed to write a response stating that they would be in contact with you. At this time, I realize there is a great possibility that they never contacted you, even though we requested follow up numerous occasions.
I know, as the CEO, I am fully responsible for the filings of the company. Now I find myself in a horrible situation as we are under a temporary suspension. We have tried to speak to our securities counsel directly all week to get an answer regarding this matter and have found them unattainable.
With this known fact, I contacted you directly and humbly request the following:
1.) A six month period allowance to submit 3 years of 10Q's and 10K's with audited financials, for the sole purpose of becoming fully reporting again with the SEC. This will provide us with enough time to secure new securities counsel that can work with our auditors.
2.) Allow for us to file an amendment to the Form 15 stating that the Form 15 was filed in error and is withdrawn.
3.) We will register such re-sales or provide an analysis of any exemption from registration that we believe is available and as relating to the event listed here and as noted in your letter to our office dated January 26, 2012 “The Form 8-K dated June 22, 2011 indicates that Mindpix Corp. will issue 400,000,000 shares…in exchange for all the common stock in eMax Media, Inc.” and that “the eMax Worldwide, Inc. (“EMXC&rdquo , shareholders are entitled to receive one share of common stock dividends in Mindpix Corp. for every 32 shares of common stock that is owned in EMXC. This transaction appears to be a spin-off of Mindpix Corp., and you appear to be acting as an underwriter in the issuance of the 400 million Mindpix shares to the shareholders of eMax Worldwide, Inc.”
Anyone know status of this ?
Dear Mr. Lopez
Provided below is a copy of the correspondence that was sent to our office dated January 26, 2012. As previously directed by our securities counsel attached you will find the letter we first sent to your office on July 14, 2011.
At this time, I wish to thank you for your time, consideration and understanding in this important matter. I would be humbly appreciative if we were allowed the time requested to file the necessary reports to your office and as for the reason we are retaining new securities counsel to aid our office with these filing responsibilities.
Sincerely Roxanne Webber
Mrs. Roxanna Weber Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of eMax Worldwide WITCH IS FOUND
ROX IS THE THEME AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS!
MPIX EMXC what have they Shared ROX!!!! DENNY!!! cool chill
lol just found it wondering out loud
Come on. You were expecting to hear something? We are major bagholders. This thing is dead. Only hope is she gets sued or goes to jail.
found this been 6 months anyone hear anythin:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington DC 20549
Att: James Lopez (for) John Reynolds
Assistant Director
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Dear Mr Lopez,
I am forwarding this letter to you regarding our phone conversation Thursday, April 5th 2012 inquiring about the report filing requirements needed by eMax Holdings Corp (also known as eMax Worldwide, Inc.) to once again become fully reporting with your agency.
For over three years now, eMax has retained the firm McMullen Associates as our securities counsel to assist with reporting to your agency. Unfortunately, at this time it appears that the firm has yet to perform while payments are still being made. Last year after receiving the first correspondence from your office, I submitted the letter to our securities counsel and was instructed to write a response stating that they would be in contact with you. At this time, I realize there is a great possibility that they never contacted you, even though we requested follow up numerous occasions.
I know, as the CEO, I am fully responsible for the filings of the company. Now I find myself in a horrible situation as we are under a temporary suspension. We have tried to speak to our securities counsel directly all week to get an answer regarding this matter and have found them unattainable.
With this known fact, I contacted you directly and humbly request the following:
1.) A six month period allowance to submit 3 years of 10Q's and 10K's with audited financials, for the sole purpose of becoming fully reporting again with the SEC. This will provide us with enough time to secure new securities counsel that can work with our auditors.
2.) Allow for us to file an amendment to the Form 15 stating that the Form 15 was filed in error and is withdrawn.
3.) We will register such re-sales or provide an analysis of any exemption from registration that we believe is available and as relating to the event listed here and as noted in your letter to our office dated January 26, 2012 “The Form 8-K dated June 22, 2011 indicates that Mindpix Corp. will issue 400,000,000 shares…in exchange for all the common stock in eMax Media, Inc.” and that “the eMax Worldwide, Inc. (“EMXC&rdquo , shareholders are entitled to receive one share of common stock dividends in Mindpix Corp. for every 32 shares of common stock that is owned in EMXC. This transaction appears to be a spin-off of Mindpix Corp., and you appear to be acting as an underwriter in the issuance of the 400 million Mindpix shares to the shareholders of eMax Worldwide, Inc.”
Provided below is a copy of the correspondence that was sent to our office dated January 26, 2012. As previously directed by our securities counsel attached you will find the letter we first sent to your office on July 14, 2011.
At this time, I wish to thank you for your time, consideration and understanding in this important matter. I would be humbly appreciative if we were allowed the time requested to file the necessary reports to your office and as for the reason we are retaining new securities counsel to aid our office with these filing responsibilities.
Sincerely Yours,
Roxanna Weber
S/Roxanna Weber
CEO/Chairman
Attachments
1. Letter from the SEC to eMax Worldwide, Inc.
January 26, 2012
Via E-mail
Roxanna Weber
Chairman, President and Director
eMax Worldwide, Inc.
1512 South 1100 East, Suite B
Salt Lake City, UT 84105
Re: eMax Worldwide, Inc.
Form 15
Filed January 9, 2012
File No. 033-20394-D
Dear Ms. Weber:
We note that eMax Worldwide, Inc. filed a Form 15 on January 9, 2012 indicating there
are approximately 2,881 holders of record of your common stock. As requested in our March
28, 2011 letter, please file an amendment to the Form 15 stating that the Form 15 was filed in
error and is withdrawn. In the event eMax Worldwide, Inc. decides to appeal the Division’s
decision and not withdraw the Form 15, you should follow the procedures for doing so on the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s website. Those procedures can be found at:
http://www.sec.gov/info/edgar/cfedgarguidance.htm.
We further note the outstanding comments from our letter dated June 30, 2011 regarding
your Form 8-K filed on June 23, 2011. We re-issue the following comments, as we have not
received a response as of the date of this letter. Please file all required reports, including any
past due reports, and respond to our comments below within ten business days. If you do not
believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.
1. The Form 8-K dated June 22, 2011 indicates that Mindpix Corp. “will issue 400,000,000
shares…in exchange for all the common stock in eMax Media, Inc.” and that “the eMax
Worldwide, Inc. (“EMXC&rdquo , shareholders are entitled to receive one share of common
stock dividends in Mindpix Corp. for every 32 shares of common stock that is owned in
EMXC.” This transaction appears to be a spin-off of Mindpix Corp., and you appear to
be acting as an underwriter in the issuance of the 400 million Mindpix shares to the
shareholders of eMax Worldwide, Inc. Please advise us as to why you believe
registration under the Securities Act of 1933 is not required. See Division of Corporation
Finance Staff Legal Bulletin No. 4, Sept. 16, 1997, available at
http://www.sec.gov/interps/legal/slbcf4.txt.
Roxanna Weber
eMax Worldwide, Inc.
January 26, 2012
Page 2
2. It appears that the recipients of Mindpix Corp.’s shares would act as underwriters in
resales of those shares, requiring registration under the Securities Act of 1933 for such
resales, absent an available exemption. Please confirm that you will register such resales
or provide an analysis of any exemption from registration that you believe is available.
3. It appears that eMax Worldwide, Inc. continues to have a duty to file reports under
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Please file all required periodic
reports, including any past due reports.
Please respond to this letter within ten business days by amending your filing, by
providing the requested information, or by advising us when you will provide the requested
response. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not
believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response.
You may contact Erin Wilson at (202) 551-6047 or James Lopez at (202) 551-3536 with
any questions.
Sincerely,
/s/ James Lopez (for)
John Reynolds
Assistant Director
2. Letter sent to your office from eMax Worldwide
July 14, 2011
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington DC 20549
To Whom It May Concern,
As it pertains to your letter dated Jun 30, 2011, please know that our office has
forwarded this letter to our legal securities counsel
McMullen And Associates LLC
10701 McMullen Creek Parkway
Charlotte, NC28226
for and your office can expect correspondence from their office and answering your questions correctly as soon as possible.
As it stands however, our office does plan to properly file through our legal securities office all necessary reports and filings that are required for our company to become fully reporting and regarding all dividends that are being issued in our company eMax Worldwide in addition to announced dividends related to the company Mindpix, Corp,
Should you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact our office or Mr McMullen office directly.
Sincerely Yours,
Roxanna Weber, President. And CEO
http://www.macreportmedia.com/ViewSubmission....uest=13996
Chill finally at mpix well done webber u crashed two syms
COOL info on ROX and EMXC go to the mpix board too. they think they are real some people still do
well it was paying 5k a month in the last place can imagine what it is now??
yeah but i think if she owns an expsensive car we will know where the money is going was my thought.
the company rented them a new house i heard hmmm lets see if we can find that addy should be in the filings huh. well prolly under that line item expense
Followers
|
252
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
47856
|
Created
|
03/20/03
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |