The disappointing part of this felony case for me is that we didn't learn about it before it went to trial. Why? Because the only possible weak defense that I can think of on the felony charge is that slick Roxie would claim that she didn't see the lights or hear the sirens of the police car that was attempting to pull her over. So, it would be the officer's word vs hers. THAT'S where the fun would start.
What I would have done is to contact the District Attorney, and give them all the Emax PRs and ask slick Roxie on the stand, "did you say on Aug 2010 that the dividends would be paid soon? What about in Dec 2010? Feb 2011? etc! Where they paid yet Ms Weber? Did you say Ms Weber that the audit was near completion in 2010? Was it Ms Weber? We have your accountant here to testify. Ms Weber, I have here 25 PRs you put out. Were ANY of those items you PRed ever completed? Any of them?" In short, she would end up having absolutely no credibility, and end up being convicted in part due to her decade of Emax bull! How fitting would that be!
In the end, she was convicted anyway of course!
