InvestorsHub Logo

bbking2003

03/28/14 2:00 PM

#7463 RE: MolBiol #7462

This looks like a red flag very nervous right now. I have so many shares and if I want to sell this thing will drop $2-$3

Pyrrhonian

03/28/14 2:25 PM

#7468 RE: MolBiol #7462

Because it's a DOUBLE BLINDED TRIAL, my man. Read up on what that means. No reason to get all 1920s mob-ruled city suspicious, know what I'm sayin? ;). The Company remains blinded through the entire trial. They are only unblinded in the event that they must decide upon a halt or not. Let go of all these "Linda has seen the data!" conspiracy theory-esque suspicions. They're absurd. Be a scientist, because you are one.

foxhound02

03/28/14 2:46 PM

#7476 RE: MolBiol #7462

Hello I am back. I got shut out yesterday at a 15 post limit. I did not know that existed. Anyway. First, I was wrong about Linda announcing the ASCO acceptance during the presentation. This is unusual without a PR, but she apparently is going the route of public media as an alternative. I had my finger on the buy button and bought 500 mores shares as soon as the words trickled out of her mouth. That was what I was waiting for. Those shares are currently under water but that is fine. I am waiting for the ASCO run-up about mid-May.

Regarding the possibility of expanding the trial. One possibility is that with so much invested and on the line, why not make sure? Go for 4 months with a larger sample size to tease out the difference. Any change is going to make people nervous, me too. My guess is that enrollment is roaring, so a three month delay would be worth the wait. 67 of my shares (-98% after reverse splits) are over 10 years old. I can wait.

foxhound02

03/28/14 2:50 PM

#7478 RE: MolBiol #7462

PS Your thesis suggests that the DMC told the company about trending results. That would make Linda a liar and I do not think that she is. She said they were "totally" blinded to the data. I believe that would include information on trending results.