InvestorsHub Logo

WithCatz

03/25/14 10:20 AM

#397151 RE: fsshon #397149

Bluee -- WMI stated several times that they were never issues of mortgages, nor were servicer of mortgages, or were owners of any mortgages.

And it is factual that the OTS seized 100% of WMB. They transferred 100% of WMB to the FDIC Receiver.

Now, of course, it gets messy after that on what did and did not pass to JPM -- from the FDIC.

But otherwise, there is no question that WMI does not - and never did - have any mortgages, period.

...Catz

ItsMyOption

03/25/14 10:40 AM

#397156 RE: fsshon #397149

Hi BlueeFoxx, This is ILoveStocks and you know I filed many FEE objections. At the finial fee hearing and during my objections I presented to JMW I asked if she has seen this 118 page Purchase and Assumption agreement. She stated that she did not know about it. I asked Mr.Rosen if he could confirm that this very important document was not disclosed to the court. At that point she stopped me and stated if I wish to pursue this that I needed to file proper papers.
I only brought that up to get recorded, as IMO that could be fraud, and our WMILT could run with that. It could be one of the many sealed documents. You will find more info about that document here:

http://www.scribd.com/collections/3675055/Secret-FDIC-and-JPMorgan-Chase-Bank-118-Page-Purchase-and-Assumption-Agreement-for-Washington-Mutual-Bank

UpTickMeA$AP

03/25/14 10:45 AM

#397157 RE: fsshon #397149

You should skip trace Willy Wonka.

:-D

Glta

Rico Sworevey

03/25/14 11:41 AM

#397168 RE: fsshon #397149

WMB owned those loans, not WMI, thus nothing would benefit WMILT.