Replies to post #196426 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[44centsAKAchoccake]

The important point is that this is just the filings by Perry, Fairholme, and Arrowwood that was due yesterday.

THEY included a DRAFT decision, but that's meaningless.

The Judge has been silent lately, but will have to rule sometime relatively soon.

[obiterdictum]

Thanks for the link and the posting of the filings.

I am sure you have noticed how different the arguments are in the injunctive lawsuit in the US District Court compared to the taking claims lawsuit in the Court of Federal Claims.

Given the federal evidence requirements of the Plaintiffs' claims, the federal rules of court procedure and standards for case management held by the each Court, the approaches are almost coerced into being.

See:
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/rules/civil-procedure.pdf.

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE
http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/rules/rules-evidence.pdf

RULES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/dcd/sites/www.dcd.uscourts.gov.dcd/files/2010_MARCH_LOCAL_RULES_REVISED_July2011_July2013.pdf

RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/court_info/20130813_rules/13.08.30%20Final%20Version%20of%20Rules.pdf

[chessmaster315]

The motion for Summary Judgement appears related to the Proposed Order.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=99274595

See the first link for the Motion for Summary Judgement.

and

http://www.pacermonitor.com/permalink/172227128242816