InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JJ8

03/22/14 4:37 PM

#14687 RE: rosen62 #14682

rosen62, that's indeed great news.

Thanks for posting it. Have a great weekend and GLTY
icon url

blanka

03/22/14 5:40 PM

#14693 RE: rosen62 #14682

This is Awesome!!! Sticky this! !!
icon url

Zargis

03/22/14 9:34 PM

#14699 RE: rosen62 #14682

Thank you for finding and posting this news!

-z
icon url

Donotunderstand

03/23/14 10:14 AM

#14707 RE: rosen62 #14682

rosen

thank you

that makes two judges

although I think in one case it was an issue of "right place" and here it was an issue of "standing"?
icon url

Donotunderstand

03/23/14 10:33 AM

#14710 RE: rosen62 #14682

Rosen

So where are we

Nothing said by Judge?

Papers put in on Friday?

What is the argument? What to do or as in Fairholme the ability to bring a case in that court? (which has been decided as yes so far in Fairholme subject to discovery proving that the GOV was one and one in Amendment 3 - i.e. this was not a private company in the eyes of the law - and as such a FEDERAL law on GOV to GOV actions applies -0-- as I understand statuss of Fairhom?)