MPowerKai, I have no legal background but have been in court many times in my project management career of about 40 years (mostly for engineering and construction projects). I can't think of any party suing the Gov has much of a chance of making inroads in such an undertaking, imo.
However, the only part that is a bit puzzling to me is the 2012 Amendment that appears to be a contradiction to what is stated in the rules and responsibilities for the Conservator-ship. I don't know if that could open a window of opportunity. Imo, that could present hopefully a 'rewarding' situation' for recognition of the Constitutional clauses of property rights as defined by the Constitution. Albeit, a limited chance, at best. Unless, of course, the whole case is either thrown out of the courts as the Gov. intentions are regarded to be for the collective good of the nation as a whole given a dire emergency threat. Had this kind of thing been allowed, the Gov. would be bogged down by many suits by powerful interests in our nation. Isn't that one important reason why most powerful interest groups in any nation usually have the means to succeed in the democracies of the world? Isn't why for instance, our leaders and the Fed have an agreement to formalize the powerful banking cartel around the world? Food for thought. My 2c! GLTY