Thursday, March 20, 2014 6:34:15 PM
However, the only part that is a bit puzzling to me is the 2012 Amendment that appears to be a contradiction to what is stated in the rules and responsibilities for the Conservator-ship. I don't know if that could open a window of opportunity. Imo, that could present hopefully a 'rewarding' situation' for recognition of the Constitutional clauses of property rights as defined by the Constitution. Albeit, a limited chance, at best. Unless, of course, the whole case is either thrown out of the courts as the Gov. intentions are regarded to be for the collective good of the nation as a whole given a dire emergency threat. Had this kind of thing been allowed, the Gov. would be bogged down by many suits by powerful interests in our nation. Isn't that one important reason why most powerful interest groups in any nation usually have the means to succeed in the democracies of the world? Isn't why for instance, our leaders and the Fed have an agreement to formalize the powerful banking cartel around the world? Food for thought. My 2c! GLTY
FEATURED ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
FEATURED CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM