I think in this case the so called "cliché" (it's actually regarded as a proverb) is true. Who in his right mind would do business with LP other then someone with his ethics, especially in a public company.
Attacking it as false logic and comparing it to "opposites attract" seems to me to be an apologist tactic to debunk the comparison. It was never meant to be a logical argument, rather it was meant to show what life's experience usually demonstrates to most observers.
We all know his back ground, would you trust him with your money?? If you would there's a "cliché" that applies to that which I won't quote here unless you would like me to.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
