InvestorsHub Logo

jetpilot1101

03/13/14 8:03 PM

#62127 RE: paddydaddy #62126

I'd tell you but you won't believe me so why should I waste the time and effort.

If I tell you that I have facts A, B, and C from my sources and those facts don't jive with what Dr. Decosta's is saying or the narrative on MP, what will your response be? Don't waste your time answering, the question is rhetorical. Why should I waste my time imparting my information when it's simply going to fall on deaf ears?

I'm ready to discuss MDMN with those who can handle DD from other than the "standard pro-MDMN" sources. What I'm not willing to do is identify my sources and by doing so, unleash a barrage of harassing emails from shareholders who want nothing more than for their reality to be correct and will use any means to do so. Respectfully worded emails of phone calls are perfectly legitimate but I have a feeling that harassment will be the general tone. That is unacceptable.

I believe my sources are reliable however, I nor they are infallible. As of now, they have a significantly better track record than the mining echo chamber. I'm sticking with my sources, you stick with yours and let's discuss in 3 month and see where things stand.