Thursday, March 13, 2014 8:03:08 PM
If I tell you that I have facts A, B, and C from my sources and those facts don't jive with what Dr. Decosta's is saying or the narrative on MP, what will your response be? Don't waste your time answering, the question is rhetorical. Why should I waste my time imparting my information when it's simply going to fall on deaf ears?
I'm ready to discuss MDMN with those who can handle DD from other than the "standard pro-MDMN" sources. What I'm not willing to do is identify my sources and by doing so, unleash a barrage of harassing emails from shareholders who want nothing more than for their reality to be correct and will use any means to do so. Respectfully worded emails of phone calls are perfectly legitimate but I have a feeling that harassment will be the general tone. That is unacceptable.
I believe my sources are reliable however, I nor they are infallible. As of now, they have a significantly better track record than the mining echo chamber. I'm sticking with my sources, you stick with yours and let's discuss in 3 month and see where things stand.
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Engages Olayinka Oyebola & Co for Two-Year Audit • GRLF • May 28, 2024 8:30 AM
HealthLynked Introduces AI-Powered Chat Function to Enhance Healthcare Accessibility • HLYK • May 28, 2024 8:00 AM
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM