InvestorsHub Logo

lakeshore555

03/13/14 10:59 AM

#19773 RE: dcspka #19772

1) eWellness has nothing to do with Radient.

2) "GCDX/ William Gartner has recently expressed intent on using OnkoSure..." Recently? When and where?

3) Agree 100%. But that is more UNI Current Business than Radient Current Business. Radient gets $100,000 annual license fee if the agreement is still active, or they get nothing if UNI terminated the agreement.

4a) "RXPC has successfully fought off an attempt for the rights to CIT, and retains this property." you mean the Univ of Alberta / AccuVector lawsuit? They didn't want the rights to CIT -- they wanted money IF Radient ever made money selling CIT. As for "retain the property," Radient wrote off CIT in the 2011 10-K as a total loss for these reasons, and I quote:

· Lack of any potential future revenue;
· Lack of future cash flows;
· High cost of future clinical studies; and
· Limited time remaining on the patent.

4b) "The attempted reintroduction of CIT is covertly being handled by Dr. Andrea Small-Howard." Please explain this statement and provide evidence. Why do you say this? I don't think this is even remotely correct.

lakeshore555

03/13/14 11:20 AM

#19774 RE: dcspka #19772

A more likely explanation: Radient has no behind-the-scene machinations *TO* divulge.

I see no evidence that Radient has any intent of doing anything other than trying to find more entities to license DR-70 the way UNI licensed DR-70. If GCDx comes up with the money, I think Radient will license DR-70 to GCDx.

The only "current business" that we know about is the Class Action Settlement of $2.5 million. They appear in court April 22nd.

Radient agreed to the $2.5 million settlement. The only remaining question is: how will Radient pay that amount? They have 15 days after April 22nd to put the money in escrow. Where will that money come from?

Peggy

03/13/14 11:49 AM

#19778 RE: dcspka #19772

Yes, much easier to dupe investors with a cloak of secrecy over what they are not doing.

lakeshore555

03/13/14 9:16 PM

#19780 RE: dcspka #19772

Covert reintroduction of CIT?

"The attempted reintroduction of CIT is covertly being handled by Dr. Andrea Small-Howard..."

This is a fascinating claim. If you could convince me that this is true, I would buy this stock.

What evidence leads you to make this statement?

Thanks in advance! Keep up the fine work!

lakeshore555

03/18/14 7:47 AM

#19793 RE: dcspka #19772

Eagerly awaiting your defense of these statements:

2. "GCDX/ William Gartner has recently expressed intent on using OnkoSure for his Lung Cancer Test." When and where did he recently express this intent?

4a. "RXPC has successfully fought off an attempt for the rights to CIT." When and where? I am not aware that any entity or person sttempted to acquire the rights to CIT.

4b. "The attempted reintroduction of CIT is covertly being handled by Dr. Andrea Small-Howard..." I don't think this is remotely true. Where is the evidence to support this claim?

Thanks in advance!