Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation fka RXPC

[lakeshore555]

1) eWellness has nothing to do with Radient.

2) "GCDX/ William Gartner has recently expressed intent on using OnkoSure..." Recently? When and where?

3) Agree 100%. But that is more UNI Current Business than Radient Current Business. Radient gets $100,000 annual license fee if the agreement is still active, or they get nothing if UNI terminated the agreement.

4a) "RXPC has successfully fought off an attempt for the rights to CIT, and retains this property." you mean the Univ of Alberta / AccuVector lawsuit? They didn't want the rights to CIT -- they wanted money IF Radient ever made money selling CIT. As for "retain the property," Radient wrote off CIT in the 2011 10-K as a total loss for these reasons, and I quote:

· Lack of any potential future revenue;
· Lack of future cash flows;
· High cost of future clinical studies; and
· Limited time remaining on the patent.

4b) "The attempted reintroduction of CIT is covertly being handled by Dr. Andrea Small-Howard." Please explain this statement and provide evidence. Why do you say this? I don't think this is even remotely correct.