"How do independent monitors analyze patient scans for safety but not efficacy? Impossible."
Can someone explain this statement to me???? For someone who has dealt with doctors reading over scan results, there is absolutely NO correlation between a scan result and the safety of the treatment a patient is undergoing.
Safety only deals with the side effects of the treatment (adverse events, etc) and provides zero insight into PFS.
What am I missing here? Does he really think that looking over a scan tells the DMC how a patient feels?
Can anyone walk me through the "math" AF supposedly worked out on the back of the figurative envelope for Newlink? It's not "adding up". He seems to be making a lot of unspecified assumptions.