F2 thanks for that honest commentary about the status of the company and the GOO. I have stated in the past that the only thing that is important is the science and that will always be the leading fact that will drive the stock price.
It doesn't matter who is running the company, who is on the board, or how many PR's we send out. It is can we make the GOO work; faster, cleaner, cheaper. If so who knows where we will go?
The stock price is exactly where it is because the science hasn't been proven outside of our controlled labs. When (hopefully) we can take a prototype and stick it in the big boys machines, and they see things that they could not do without our product, then it will be worth what it should be worth then.
I never could understand the continued criticism on this MB about things that an investor should know before buying a developmental company. There have been some bad statements in the pretty far past about how close we were, which never should have been stated, but our current management team has been very conservative and honest in their assessments of where we are. They have taken all of the proper moves by hiring more scientists, and building a new lab where the action is.
In May I will literally be celebrating my ninth year of owning this stock. I doubt anyone could possibly be much more frustrated that I am not rich and retired from my LWLG stock, BUT I do understand what it will take, once and for all it is now and always will be about proving that we can DO the GOO.
We are all better served without the hyperbole that we are at the goal-line, or the rocket is about to blast off, and worst of all that we are about to be bought out, which for whatever the motivation is whips up the emotions here.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
