Replies to post #23288 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[0nceinalifetime]

I agree, that would solve the problem of misrepresentation as long as Jim remembered to update the statement as soon as he became aware of any employees participating. However, the introduction is written in third person and your suggestion is written in first person so that would not really work unless Jim credited the statement with his name.

Judging by the historical secrecy that has surrounded IDCC, I would say it's likely against company policy to allow employees to post on message boards. However, that doesn't mean that it doesn't (or won't) happen.

Once

[sluggo33]

OT matt...good luck in your debate with once

[mschere]

Ot; I would include in that proposed disclaimer..That Jluria is also unaware of any former IDCC employees that may have an ax to grind and may post misleading false information but they are welcome..

[0nceinalifetime]

Matt, thanks for taking such an active interest insuring that opinions are not stated as facts. I think our introduction to the IDCC board is much improved now that the "I am unaware of any company employees that participate... " was added.

It's important for people to speak concisely and say what they mean. Even then plenty of misunderstandings can happen.

Once

[My Dime]

"I am unaware of any company employees that participate in these board discussions, although they are welcome."

As a freebee here but having witnessed the decline of the old Raging Bull board necessitating the creation of a 'private board' (to which I was not a member), I have watched with interest how you would 'deal' with those few individuals whose sole intention was to distrupt and destroy that which they found to their dislike. Regardless if they paid...not everyone need be welcome.

You're getting stroked, Matt...