convers...Thanks for the info...with other investments that I currently have...45 days gives me enough time to resolve those and free up some more monies for BKMP!!!!GLTA
convers - Without a doubt, something HOT to be released during the first week in April! Appreciate your passing this info to all BKMPers! Load your truck. Saluti!
Question for the board....Has anyone else called and spoken with Sandy by phone ?
I have tried to research past posts to get at my questions. Maybe I missed'm. Getting to that time in space where I'm go'n to need reading glasses
This is the e-mail I sent to Sandy and received an answer for on the 8th of Feb. His answer: "I have no idea where the volume is coming from. None whatsoever."
Cause I'm feeling very contrarion and suspicious this morning, so A posit And please let's be civil :)) ....
Now everyone (most) here knows about 'forward looking statements', made by Co. execs; SEC don't care for'um. And Winick's been around way to long, not to know what not to say and say publicly.
That said; here's where I'm go'n with this.... convers says in his conversation with Sandy. That Sandy said: News releases will start to roll out at that time that will, in his words, "Blow Your Socks Off,"
And from convers: Another observation. I had asked him why he doesn't put out a release to this effect. He told me that up until about a month ago he had time to focus on these types of issues, but that today the demands of this burgeoning company pretty much limits his time to issue these types of PR's. He says that he believes that the share price of BKMP will benefit much more from the effort being put into what is soon coming to fruition. He concluded by reiterating,"Give it about 45 days."
It's the "Give it 45 days" that's mainly causing the doubt. Forward looking and insider (only told to convers). It's the "Blow your socks off" causing doubt. Forward looking. It's convers and his stating Sandy's opinion that's causing doubt. And why wasn't a question about TA response to S/H's asked and answered; since TA topic was covered ?
So, since convers has been the only person to obtain these statements from Sandy, hence the doubts.
convers....Don't lash out. I'm not calling you anything. I'm not bashing. I'm just doing a posit....
Main Entry: pos·it Pronunciation: 'pä-z&t Function: transitive verb Inflected Form(s): pos·it·ed /'pä-z&-t&d, 'päz-t&d/; pos·it·ing /'pä-z&-ti[ng], 'päz-ti[ng]/ Etymology: Latin positus, past participle of ponere 1 : to dispose or set firmly : FIX 2 : to assume or affirm the existence of : POSTULATE 3 : to propose as an explanation : SUGGEST
imo winick better be a bit more "prudent" in what he states, although i am confident he knows it would be propagated on this and other boards
and why not...its not in an "official" PR so he cant be held accountable for the statements, but at the same time he can give SHs what they want to hear...regardless if it is factual or not
"...blow your socks off..."????, lol perhaps someone can translate in real terms exactly what that means to the common SH
"...Give it about 45 days..."???, yowzer! okey-dokey, lets look at the past 30 days for trend
given that the TA is by "default" essentially gagged, and that the only "official" mention of OS was the financial report dated 09/30/05, almost 1/2 year ago!, who knows what it will be in 45 days
[note: the jan 9 PR mentioned "capital structure has not changed", which refers to AS not OS]
if it aint in a PR, anyone doing serious DD wouldnt even let hear-say statements get to the first level of investigation, and as we all have hopefully learned, even in a PR any companys statements need to be quantified