InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 6061
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/10/2000

Re: convers post# 38065

Sunday, 02/19/2006 12:03:55 PM

Sunday, February 19, 2006 12:03:55 PM

Post# of 315345
NICE "REPORT"!, too bad its ALL hear-say...

imo winick better be a bit more "prudent" in what he states, although i am confident he knows it would be propagated on this and other boards

and why not...its not in an "official" PR so he cant be held accountable for the statements, but at the same time he can give SHs what they want to hear...regardless if it is factual or not

"...blow your socks off..."????, lol
perhaps someone can translate in real terms exactly what that means to the common SH

"...Give it about 45 days..."???, yowzer!
okey-dokey, lets look at the past 30 days for trend



given that the TA is by "default" essentially gagged, and that the only "official" mention of OS was the financial report dated 09/30/05, almost 1/2 year ago!, who knows what it will be in 45 days

[note: the jan 9 PR mentioned "capital structure has not changed", which refers to AS not OS]

and what about...?
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?Message_id=9652516&txt2find=jan

if it aint in a PR, anyone doing serious DD wouldnt even let hear-say statements get to the first level of investigation, and as we all have hopefully learned, even in a PR any companys statements need to be quantified