InvestorsHub Logo

votrade

02/23/14 12:14 AM

#89750 RE: risk on #89748

OK, wait for next week and see if you are right?

Scripo

02/23/14 12:18 AM

#89752 RE: risk on #89748

you should layoff the amps and get some rest. its ok boards not going anywhere..

0001

02/23/14 12:21 AM

#89753 RE: risk on #89748

So Yak and the other products are made in imaginary collectives? Someone has to be manufacturing and delivering these Yak products and other

SSCadaver

02/23/14 1:28 AM

#89785 RE: risk on #89748

I have to admit, I do find it very odd that people won't simply list the dispensary. These are companies, folks. They are meant to take phone calls and answer questions. Especially if they are in cahoots with publicly traded companies, and even more-so if the companies are one of the SKTO dispensaries. A name would help the legitimacy of both SKTO and AEGY, both of which are under a very shady umbrella, iequity. If you can easily add some validity to the situation by posting a name, why wouldnt you? It seems simple, it won't affect the dispensary negatively, seeing as only about 15 people would call to confirm, if that - And it would indeed cause the stock price to go up, as investors like me, that own shares already, would buy heaps more.

Instead, we sit on the sideline and let this stock trade sideways day after day. I've emailed iequity, Gomez, and Benz, and haven't received a name of a single dispensary, nor an answer as to why rhipple@aegy.net is still connected to the company. If this is a true, legitimate company, they need to update their shareholders as to why they are still connected to a known, SEC banned con-man.

I just don't understand the lack of willingness to help not only your own investment, but others as well. And no, I'm not a short, look at my posting history to find proof that I own stock here.

Still so much sketchiness here. Too many to da moons, and not enough credible DD.