InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Good-Til-Cancelled

02/16/06 5:02 PM

#200440 RE: Spokes #200438

Spokes,

You are correct but it's the brokerages that CMKX and the task
force are trying to prove did the misdeed of naked shorting the
stock. It's interesting that some shareholders cannot get their
certs after almost three months. Why? I got mine in three weeks.
Maybe the brokerages have something to hide, that's what we'll
find out...

GTC


icon url

Tavycal

02/16/06 5:25 PM

#200447 RE: Spokes #200438

Spokes You keep calling this distribution of assets a dividend, imo it is not a dividend. If it were a div then you would be correct.
icon url

Stks_Not_Toys

02/16/06 5:59 PM

#200457 RE: Spokes #200438

Spokes - is this your theory or an attorney's.

Have you even consulted an attorney about your theory?

Don't you think that it would be wise to do just that, rather than letting your anger rule your thoughts?

You make a lot of statements about a judge ruling in your favor. I think you had better check it out.
icon url

gump90

02/16/06 6:01 PM

#200458 RE: Spokes #200438

You know Spokes ..

You are hitting on the very crux of this whole matter. The premise is that the brokers are thieves and counterfeiters. What exactly did you buy ? I suggest that you THINK you bought shares in the company .. when all you actually bought was an electronic credit saying that you did. There are some controversial points here. But it is a FACT that the company does not know that you are a shareholder. You could have been the 'buy' side of a counterfeit transaction. And I am suggesting to you here and now that the total of all those who THINK they are shareholders plus the total of all the certs now in hand is much larger than what it is supposed to be. And the counterfeit shorts are the excess.
icon url

janice shell

02/17/06 12:06 AM

#200482 RE: Spokes #200438

Well said.