Replies to post #41241 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[dr frudaky]

Gcbr


Thank you for your kind response to my post.

My post stated the following facts:

1. I read that article with interest...but only with respect to IBM and the big players in the field of predictive medicine.

2. There is no mention of DNAG.

3. Those out there have not even confirmed the greatness of what DNAG has to offer.



Based on the above facts, I concluded with my following opinions:

1. I seriously doubt if DNAG will have any play in the big scheme of things.

2. We will need something of real substance before the pps will go up.


I believe my facts are clear unless, of course, you can dispute them with contrary facts. My opinions are, well, just that.

BTW, you have always stated positive things about this company and stock, all without any facts to support your position. The financials of the company and its pps are facts which clearly prove you wrong.

JMHO from the facts.

dr f