Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:50:25 AM
Thank you for your kind response to my post.
My post stated the following facts:
1. I read that article with interest...but only with respect to IBM and the big players in the field of predictive medicine.
2. There is no mention of DNAG.
3. Those out there have not even confirmed the greatness of what DNAG has to offer.
Based on the above facts, I concluded with my following opinions:
1. I seriously doubt if DNAG will have any play in the big scheme of things.
2. We will need something of real substance before the pps will go up.
I believe my facts are clear unless, of course, you can dispute them with contrary facts. My opinions are, well, just that.
BTW, you have always stated positive things about this company and stock, all without any facts to support your position. The financials of the company and its pps are facts which clearly prove you wrong.
JMHO from the facts.
dr f
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 5 oz/ton Gold, 1.5 oz/ton Platinum, 0.5 oz/ton Palladium, and 0.5 oz/ton Rhodium at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Oct 4, 2024 9:15 AM
Basanite, Inc. Appoints Ali Manav as Interim Chief Executive Officer • BASA • Oct 3, 2024 9:15 AM
Integrated Ventures Announces Launch of MedWell Facilities, LLC and Lease Agreement with Giant Fitness Clubs • INTV • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Beyond the Horizon: Innovative Drug Combinations Offer New Hope for Alzheimer's and More • NVS • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service To Enhance Natural Rubber Industry's Ability to Report on Sustainable and Ethical Supply Chains • SMX • Oct 3, 2024 7:00 AM
Transforming Alzheimer's Treatment: Innovative Combinations to Boost Cognition • PFE • Oct 2, 2024 9:00 AM