InvestorsHub Logo

Watts Watt

02/17/14 1:40 PM

#45835 RE: joshuaeyu #45830

Don't wish to alarm you, but your post is what I responded to and the reason I had to write the post.

The fact that Apple may elect to use a non-beryllium liquidmetal, such as 105, does not preclude them from having it made from within their own resources, which may or not include Materion.

The point is this:

liquidmetal has never spelled out how they will make money from Materion sales of ANY liquidmetal. They have never spelled out what is the contractual relationship dollar wise between LQMT and MTRN.

This is the point I am making.

Until then, Apple this and Apple that is MEANINGLESS.