InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ziploc_1

05/03/03 11:32 AM

#22583 RE: GE_Jim #22572

Future options should be out of the money
A minimum of $35/share and a maximum of 4 years would be needed to "align the interests of management with that of stockholders". If this company is as good an investment as I think it is and management says it is, they should still be richly rewarded. When options begin to be expensed, as I'm sure they soon will be, you won't see deals much better than this.
icon url

BondGekko

05/03/03 2:52 PM

#22599 RE: GE_Jim #22572

gejim correct me if i am wrong, but samsung already went into arbitration and the agreement is that they will pay whatever nokia pays

by the way how much further do we have to fall in order to be oversold, u said that after trading day on april 1 when we closed at 18.75, just wondering is it 16, 15, curious
icon url

blueskywaves

05/03/03 5:44 PM

#22606 RE: GE_Jim #22572

So you don't need a rational basis for comparing executive compensation? LOL.

My point has been and is still is the increase and release of too many options vs the productivity released by the company

Boy, are you stubborn. Again, what's your basis for saying that IDCC has issued too many options?

RMBS needed to dilute nearly 100M+ shares to get to the $100M licensing revenue level. ARMHY needed to dilute 330M+ shares to get to the $200M-250M licensing revenue level. IDCC only needed to dilute, what, 60M-70M shares to get to the $200M licensing revenue level.

That's excessive??? No wonder you're drowning in the shallow waters of your subjectivity!