InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JLH2

02/12/14 12:33 PM

#28438 RE: Shail #28437

How many of the 28 customers could be providing marking services for the 58 contracts?
icon url

yip

02/12/14 12:45 PM

#28440 RE: Shail #28437

The last APDN PR on the subject headlined: STONY BROOK, NY, December 4, 2013 - Applied DNA Sciences Signs Three New Customers in Military Electronics Anti-counterfeiting Program Includes Sixth Electronics Manufacturer, Twenty Six Contracts in Total.
http://www.adnas.com/sites/default/files/press.release.three_.new_.military.customers.12.04.2013.pdf

The 58 "client" number was the Total Suppliers providing 5962s to the DLA that A1M posted on 2/10:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=97064200

Perhaps 3rd party?, or previous negotiated contracts, delays, or some other explanation for the difference but APDN seems to have been more or less consistent in their numbers.

icon url

drr4970

02/12/14 12:46 PM

#28441 RE: Shail #28437

Your last 2 posts are excellent, and you are correct questioning the utter confusion of the sign up numbers.
Also, even if it is only 28 signed up clients, the revenues still are utterly perplexing, to say the least, AND, if you deduct that income, what the heck is left ??
Surely the Doctor, must of been anticipating a much higher income stream, with the explosion of new staff ?
Been here a long long time, but now worrying how long we can continue haemorraging money each quarter.
Not selling, but not happy, mainly because we, the investors, are being kept completely at arms length, and any cc questions put forward by this board are always totally ignored. They see them and read them, but I believe they just do not, or cannot answer them !
As for the deferred income, you hit the nail on the head, we are just consoling, and kidding ourselves! We should be reaching that figure, and more, by now anyway. We should not have to rely on deferred revenue to make up the quarter.