Replies to post #8478 on Cdex, Inc. (fka CDEX)

[ontheedge01]

d4diddy:

I am expressing my thoughts of what I have read. If and when you have the time to read any and all patents you can regarding " detectable by x-ray fluorescence ", and take 33 pages of specific notes, you may or may not come to the same conclusion I have.

You are trying to twist words into my mouth again. The wording of patents are unique in their language, or you get it returned with a letter telling you to try again.

I draw my conclusions from what I have read, or maybe I should say in most cases, what I have not read in other patents.

If my conclusions prove to be wrong, so be it. I have certainly read plenty of your conclusions.

I have no idea if ELF worked utilizing this same principle. But I will have to say, to think that CDEX has not vastly improved the science behind all of its applications, would be to be with ones head in the sand.

I would like for you to post what you wrote September 17, 2004 at 11:59am.

T I A

[Crow3]

DIDDY did not come to IHUB before June 2005.

If you have any sept 2004 posts archived, why don't you post it.