d4diddy:
I am expressing my thoughts of what I have read. If and when you have the time to read any and all patents you can regarding " detectable by x-ray fluorescence ", and take 33 pages of specific notes, you may or may not come to the same conclusion I have.
You are trying to twist words into my mouth again. The wording of patents are unique in their language, or you get it returned with a letter telling you to try again.
I draw my conclusions from what I have read, or maybe I should say in most cases, what I have not read in other patents.
If my conclusions prove to be wrong, so be it. I have certainly read plenty of your conclusions.
I have no idea if ELF worked utilizing this same principle. But I will have to say, to think that CDEX has not vastly improved the science behind all of its applications, would be to be with ones head in the sand.
I would like for you to post what you wrote September 17, 2004 at 11:59am.
T I A
