Replies to post #22223 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[0nceinalifetime]

Why wouldn't I throw that out, is it an unmentionable?

"and for you to throw out that "the GSM ERICY agreement expires in 3 short years....so you think that will be the end of funds coming in from ERICY? You best rethink that shorty."

Where I come from the length of a contract is one of the most important things. I don't know why the contract would come to an end so quickly. BTW, I never said that would necessarily end all funds from Ericy but the revenues from that contract will end. That's indisputable and I don't know why you would take exception to my mention of it.

Once

[mschere]

Question..Was that FUD spewed out on this board? IDCC/Ericy and IDCC/SONY/ERICY is standard average contract length even for Qualcomm license span..Possibly Q is LONG years and IDCC is SHORT years..Both licenses run THROUGH 2006.That is five years and the longest I could find even for Q is seven years.


and for you to throw out that "the GSM ERICY agreement expires in 3 short years....so you think that will be the end of funds coming in from ERICY? You best rethink that shorty.