Replies to post #49920 on XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[jcimdog1]

Thanks, your research on the stock has been excellent.

[bluecheaps4me]

Snooop40......You are EXACTLY right !

"As far as the appeal(s) cases are concerned, my understanding is that in order for an appeal to be successful, the appellant must establish that the decision being appealed was formed based on an error. That could be violating a party's due process rights, incorrectly applying case law, making a decision that is contrary to "clear and convincing" evidence, or other forms of "abuse of discretion". I just don't see that in Google's appeal brief.

In the case of Vringo's appeal, it is much more clear where they are suggesting an error(s) occurred."

Of course GOOG can appeal, BUT do they have a legitimate reason for appeal ?

Were they done an injustice? Show where. The judge in this case bent over backwards to accomodate Google, and everybody knows that.

[tutankhamen]

The real question with the shorting is not "if" or "how" but very much "why" and "who". With the market sentiment so poor right now, and all the weak hands out of this, why would you target a stock with almost zero negative catalysts in the coming months, motive can only be that a large contingent has to be doing this for GOOGLE. Nothing else make sense to me.