InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 66
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/03/2006

Re: Snoooop40 post# 49920

Saturday, 02/01/2014 11:20:05 PM

Saturday, February 01, 2014 11:20:05 PM

Post# of 68424
Snooop40......You are EXACTLY right !

"As far as the appeal(s) cases are concerned, my understanding is that in order for an appeal to be successful, the appellant must establish that the decision being appealed was formed based on an error. That could be violating a party's due process rights, incorrectly applying case law, making a decision that is contrary to "clear and convincing" evidence, or other forms of "abuse of discretion". I just don't see that in Google's appeal brief.

In the case of Vringo's appeal, it is much more clear where they are suggesting an error(s) occurred."

Of course GOOG can appeal, BUT do they have a legitimate reason for appeal ?

Were they done an injustice? Show where. The judge in this case bent over backwards to accomodate Google, and everybody knows that.