InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

newgold

01/15/14 12:05 AM

#19017 RE: Tibby #19013

Tibby, seriously you have no idea WHY we need a change??? Let's see where to begin, how about we are halted with no news from MSX BOD or our leader, Brent on the halt or if it will be lifted. Next we are a joint partner with Jorge on a mine in Chile that has been in court with no news since May 2013. We hired Barbara Salinas as our lawyer in Chile to take on Barrick which she did. Sept 29 they had 15 days to respond to the court and then nothing. So no news on that front. Apparently MSX took another stab at Fitz and this was thrown out of court, plus MSX pays all of the court costs and again no news from Brent or the MSX BOD. We had a news release on Juneau that there was gold there but maybe a possible title problem never another word on this except from you Tibby that we were never going to mine the property anyway. We have core sample sitting in storage in Montana paying $500.00/month for the last 15 years. That again according to you we are not going to mine. Tibby can you see a pattern here why we need a change. Since 1995 $20 million has come into MWR/MSX and what has Brent done to move the company forward??? How about NOTHING!!!!! Gee I think we need a change a new direction oh how about a PROFITABLE direction. WOW what a concept. Hey Tibby see if you can make it happen. We will all be grateful.
icon url

ADubiousCharacter

01/15/14 2:55 AM

#19020 RE: Tibby #19013

You say that advocates of change have "no freeking idea", but that assumes that you do. Unfortunately, if you're backing that assumption with research into Steve Davis-esque conspiracy theories, then I don't believe you know any better.

Sure... you can let the imagination run wild this this "mystery wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma" stuff , but if you can't count on MSX's management for boring stuff like basic management skills and sound strategy, you'll never get past the first layer. As to whether this kind of "knowledge" has value, the only honest answer is: yes - I'd peg it at negative $20 million so far.

Skipping past the airy-faery conspiracy stuff, Brent Johnson accepted real-world money from people who have the right to expect competent management. Unfortunately, Brent can't deliver on that expectation. If he cared for anything but his own salary, I think he would step aside to give the company a chance.