InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

nieves

04/29/03 7:39 AM

#21517 RE: sjratty #21514

sjratty, I finally agree with you.good post.
icon url

GE_Jim

04/29/03 7:40 AM

#21518 RE: sjratty #21514

That's fine but have the compensation for incentive base product {patents} only become available when the patents have been licensed and sold and in IDCC's case not given away but rather creating earnings that match the reward. Were a little weak in this area.
icon url

Danny Detail

04/29/03 8:23 AM

#21528 RE: sjratty #21514

sjratty .. RE:"We simply need to inform institutions, Wall Street and others that our compensation system is heavily tied to options and make them understand that insider sales take the place of a higher salary. If we can establish this with those who need to know, they will simply shrug off insider sales as a part of compensation."

The institutions and WS understand everything about the role of options in the compensation system as well as what insider sales represent. The lack of knowledge and understanding in these areas lies exclusively with some on this board and "Joe Investor" and no amount of press releases will ever change that. Please note that I am not making a statement about the appropriateness of past option grants or of this latest proposal. I am just commenting on your assertion that the institutions and WS need us to educate them on this subject.


icon url

randomwalk

04/29/03 8:56 AM

#21540 RE: sjratty #21514

Looks like management's tucking away a little golden parachute.eom
Rand