Replies to post #142403 on NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK)

[jutkl]

Interesting.

[nuubie]

can the TA be wrong about the amount of shares.

DD on NTEK's TA Stalt Inc:

Plaintiffs allege that they lost over $2 million as a result of the stop orders because VitaminSpice's share price dropped precipitously while the stop orders were in place. Compl. ¶ 75. Plaintiffs explain that no broker will accept "stopped shares" for deposit because the marketability of those shares has been called into question. Id. ¶ 60. Thus, according to Plaintiffs, "a 30-day stop order amounts to a permanent block of sale." Id. Plaintiffs allege that, sometime after November 2010, Stalt temporarily refrained from reissuing the 30-day stop order "at every single step in the chain leading to sale." Id. ¶ 64. Pursuant to these concessions, Plaintiffs were able sell their shares and mitigate some of their damages. Id. ¶ 65.

http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FDCO%2020120522782

http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2011cv06679/252258/81

[KingErik999]

No dilution. Simple fact. No need to hope. As for NTEK not responding to CES with a positive upward movement it's not as confusing as it may seem. With how far they've come many investors will start to flow in as we get some details about retail, content, & quarterly results.

As David F said, "by Super Bowl Sunday, the launch of UltraFlix with 100 hours of content" we'll see some big green days here leading up to that.... And beyond.

There's way too much in way of progress with NTEK to see any sort of big sell off. We'll get moving again shortly.

E