InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

stocker11

12/22/13 1:09 PM

#253566 RE: sunspotter #253560

So all those who've seen and endorsed JBII's processors/technology are criminal co-conspirators? You may not have provided names but you've certainly implied that one or all of these agencies/companies made fraudulent reports or are lying (the DEC, SAIC, Islechem).
If you're not implying that one or all of these companies made a false report then we must assume then that their reports/licenses/permits are accurate and that the technology is indeed real.
And why does JBII's catalyst have to be demonized to make it sound like creating something new, that actually works, isn't possible?

No, that's not what I said at all. If you read my post carefully, you will see I said nothing about any of those specific subjects.

The conspiracy is of course run by John Bordynuik with the help, unwitting or otherwise, of a few accomplices.

Sustainable penny stock scams like JBII are always careful to play to the lowest common denominator of greed and cupidity by ensuring they have third parties that they can pretend have endorsed their business model. It all fuels the confirmation bias that crooks like Bordynuik rely upon (and they are seldom disappointed) when manipulating their mostly dim but equally avaricious marks.

However, not just the hundreds of seasoned observers of OTC fraud in the US (several of them post right here on this board) can see straight through JBII.

Others include anybody who thinks critically about the magic secret catalyst story, Mr. Market and, perhaps most critically, the SEC.

icon url

stocker11

12/23/13 9:07 AM

#253610 RE: sunspotter #253560

So all those who've seen and endorsed JBII's processors/technology are criminal co-conspirators? You may not have provided names but you've certainly implied that one or all of these agencies/companies made fraudulent reports or are lying (the DEC, SAIC, Islechem).
If you're not implying that one or all of these companies made a false report then we must assume then that their reports/licenses/permits can be relied upon and that the technology is indeed real.
And why does JBII's catalyst have to be demonized to make it sound like creating something new, that actually works, isn't possible?

Quote:No, that's not what I said at all. If you read my post carefully, you will see I said nothing about any of those specific subjects.

The conspiracy is of course run by John Bordynuik with the help, unwitting or otherwise, of a few accomplices.

Sustainable penny stock scams like JBII are always careful to play to the lowest common denominator of greed and cupidity by ensuring they have third parties that they can pretend have endorsed their business model. It all fuels the confirmation bias that crooks like Bordynuik rely upon (and they are seldom disappointed) when manipulating their mostly dim but equally avaricious marks.

However, not just the hundreds of seasoned observers of OTC fraud in the US (several of them post right here on this board) can see straight through JBII.

Others include anybody who thinks critically about the magic secret catalyst story, Mr. Market and, perhaps most critically, the SEC.